Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

New Firmware Fixes Previously Bricked iPhones

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Fri Jan 18, 2008 05:20 PM
from the house-that-iphone-built-comes-crumbling-down dept.
drcagn writes "Ars Technica reports that Apple's new 1.1.3 firmware update unbricks iPhones damaged from unlocking and updating the firmware months ago. In September, users who hacked their iPhone's firmware to unlock it found their iPhone bricked when they updated to new firmware, creating a massive upset and internet furor. Although Apple claimed this was not an intended effect of the update, it held the stance that it is not their responsibility to ensure that updates work with users' warranty-voiding hacks, and many cried foul. This update, which provides new features Jobs showed off at Macworld, while not officially unbricking the iPhone, has restored iPhones from Gizmodo and a reader of the Unofficial Apple Weblog."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Hardware: Upcoming Firmware Will Brick Unlocked iPhones 605 comments
iCry writes "It was rumored last week, and Apple has now confirmed it: 'Apple said today that a firmware update to the iPhone due to be released later this week "will likely result" in SIM-unlocked iPhones turning into very expensive bricks... So what are users of SIM-unlocked iPhones to do? Not run the latest software update, that's for sure. Users can instead pray to the hacking deities — the famed iPhone Dev Team that released the free software unlock, and iPhoneSIMfree, which released a commercial software unlock — to write applications that will undo the unlocks, as it were, if those users want to run the latest iPhone software.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Confused (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Toonol (1057698) on Friday January 18 2008, @05:31PM (#22101780)
    If a iPhone can receive an update that unbricks it, then it was never bricked in the first place.
    • Re:Confused (Score:5, Funny)

      by EggyToast (858951) on Friday January 18 2008, @05:33PM (#22101820) Homepage
      Obviously, it was only mostly bricked.
    • If a iPhone can receive an update that unbricks it, then it was never bricked in the first place.
      Sssh! Don't say that too loud! You'll enrage the mob!

      Don't listen to him folks, they're all still expensive coasters, that's right.
    • Re:Confused (Score:5, Insightful)

      The phrase "brick" is so overused as to be meaningless these days. It wasn't "bricked"; the firmware update got fubared on the hacked phones the last time it was updated, rendering the device non-functional. This one overwrites whatever chunk of firmware code that was causing the issue, and poof, it fixes the problem.

      Same as if you screwed up a BIOS update on your motherboard. Do it again, correctly and you'll be fine.
      • The phrase "brick" is so overused as to be meaningless these days. It wasn't "bricked"; the firmware update got fubared on the hacked phones the last time it was updated, rendering the device non-functional. This one overwrites whatever chunk of firmware code that was causing the issue, and poof, it fixes the problem.

        Same as if you screwed up a BIOS update on your motherboard. Do it again, correctly and you'll be fine.

        That's a rather bad analogy, since if you screw up a BIOS update on a motherboard and

        • Heh, I screwed up a BIOS flash one time ... the machine wouldn't initialize the video at all after that. It took a few minutes of cold, hard panic to realize that "hrm, the floppy drive is lighting up". Did a bit of research on another machine, and found out that I could make a boot floppy to auto-flash the BIOS with proper firmware. There was an awful lot of swearing involved, however.

          Note to readers: When flashing BIOS firmware, pay careful attention to the *ENTIRE* revision string of your motherboard. An
          • I was thinking of exactly the same experience. Windows, fubar, fix from boot floppy, everything. Forever after in my mind "bad firmware" will equal that never-to-be-sufficiently-dammned motherboard.
            • In my case, the flash died halfway through (under Windows), and left the firmware in a bad state of being partially-written. I guess it had a built-in recovery system, looking for the bootable floppy with auto-flash (non-interactive) features, and so it was purely by the grace of the BIOS Gods that I was able to get it working again. :)

              Of course, back in the late 90s, there were a few times when all that got screwed up was the MBR, which in modern parlance would be (for the average user) the equivalent of b
        • Actually, my current mobo has a feature that allows me to pop in the original driver CD in case I burn my fingers on a bad fw upgrade... No fuss, no special equipment needed.
        • Re:Confused (Score:4, Insightful)

          by jameson71 (540713) on Friday January 18 2008, @05:59PM (#22102218)
          If this update could fix the iphones, putting it into recovery mode and doing a restore probably would have fixed it too. Anyone calling that bricked shouldnt be messing with their iphone in the first place.
        • Re:Confused (Score:5, Informative)

          by jrumney (197329) on Friday January 18 2008, @06:14PM (#22102372) Homepage

          I think people splitting hairs about the use of the term "brick" are missing the point.

          Bricked is when you need to take out the soldering iron and connect up a JTAG cable. If you can still communicate with the firmware loader over USB, it isn't bricked.

        • It's not splitting hairs. Calling an iPhone that was disabled by a firmware update 'bricked' is like saying someone is dead when they still have a pulse.

          "I'm not dead yet!"
            • I still prefer 'disabled' to 'bricked'...bricked means it cannot ever be recovered by any means. Let's stop dumbing things down; it's bad enough as it is.
    • Re:Confused (Score:5, Funny)

      by vux984 (928602) on Friday January 18 2008, @06:17PM (#22102412)
      If a iPhone can receive an update that unbricks it, then it was never bricked in the first place.

      Correct. Welcome to the new age of blogger journalism where something is called bricked the moment even a single feature or other stops working.

      My wireless keyboard is on the verge of being bricked, excuse me... ... I had to go put in a new battery before I finished this post. Looks like it un-bricked my keyboard, whew.
    • The only iPhone that cannot be unbricked is this one:

      http://www.willitblend.com/videos.aspx?type=unsafe&video=iphone [willitblend.com]

      • I would say that your example doesn't constitute a bricking, since the computer was able to be recovered and put back in a workable state without specialized tools (no, knowing what jumpers to short and how to use a floppy disk don't qualify as "specialized"). If, however, the only way to reset it is by pulling the BIOS chip and reprogramming the EEPROM, then I would consider it bricked. There is a very distinct difference between the two.
  • by corsec67 (627446) on Friday January 18 2008, @05:34PM (#22101830) Homepage Journal
    If you can recover a device to a full operational state without opening its case or attaching a jTag cable, it wasn't bricked.

    Flashed with a messed up firmware, or a bad flash, sure, but not bricked.

    If you have to use a boot wait feature to load a new firmware over a network, it isn't bricked either because it was able to access a network and run a tftp server.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      If you can recover a device to a full operational state without opening its case or attaching a jTag cable, it wasn't bricked.

      Informing the Slashdot community on what "bricked" means is futile. Most Slashdot folks are wannabee computer experts who claim that they are god's gift to computer science and/or information technology.

      I think you should just blindly agree with the statement that "iPhones are often bricked when pursuing your constitutional rights due to Job's stupidity and/or evilness" and move directly onto the viability of flying cars and the IP issues of the Crackberry.

  • They are right (Score:5, Insightful)

    by geekoid (135745) <dadinportland.yahoo@com> on Friday January 18 2008, @05:34PM (#22101842) Homepage Journal
    "held the stance that it is not their responsibility to ensure that updates work with users' warranty-voiding hacks, "

    They shouldn't be held liable. You buy a product and modify it the manufacture can't, and shouldn't, be held responsible for the results.

    • They shouldn't be held liable. You buy a product and modify it the manufacture can't, and shouldn't, be held responsible for the results.

      No, Apple shouldn't be held liable, but they *should* be strongly condemned for locking it down in the first place and forcing people to resort to these measure so as to have true ownership of THEIR (not Steve's) hardware.

    • What freaks me out is the attitude that first we go out and change undocumented things on the iPhone, and second we go for the Apple-supplied firmware update. Either choice sounds reasonable to me, but both at once is foolhardy.

        • " Computers. to devise or modify (a computer program), usually skillfully."

          well, since the bricked phones weren't modified skillfully by there owners, I guess they weren't hacked.
  • If you look at http://www.hackint0sh.org/ [hackint0sh.org] (forums for the anysim iPhone unlock method), you'll see that some iBricks don't get fixed using this trick. So while this method may work for some, it isn't the cure all for all iPhone hacking mistakes.
  • ABout brick (Score:5, Insightful)

    by geekoid (135745) <dadinportland.yahoo@com> on Friday January 18 2008, @05:40PM (#22101920) Homepage Journal
    Save yourself some frustration and realizer the term brick changed when it hit the mainstream market.
    Like 'Hacker'. You can't stop it, just sigh and go on, otherwise your just screaming into the wind.

    • Save yourself some frustration and realizer the term brick changed when it hit the mainstream market.
      How ironic.
    • by Sloppy (14984) on Friday January 18 2008, @06:31PM (#22102564) Homepage Journal

      I bricked about this happening to "meme" [slashdot.org] a couple years ago, then bricked the solution, [slashdot.org] so I'd like to brick some words of encouragement to anyone who feels bricked by the loss: brick your vengeance. If you can't brick "brick," then nobody can.

      Heretofore, "to brick" can brick anything. You can brick a beer; you can brick a pizza. You can brick a computer; and you can brick your girlfriend. You can brick your hat, except in Soviet Russia, where hat bricks you.

      Go brick something, and then brick somebody about it in the hopes that they'll brick someone else. Brick the word, so the whole world will brick that they bricked "brick." Hopefully after that, maybe they will have bricked that some words are better off left unbricked.

      • Do you pronounce 'Knight' with a hard K? how about Knife? I mean thats the way the where pronounce years ago.

        The common use definition has changed. You can be the biggest ass you want, but it still won't stop the common use of 'Brick' use in this context.

        You want to get pendantic? it's not bricked at all.
        a brick is:
        a block of clay hardened by drying in the sun or burning in a kiln,

        bricked is:
        1. To construct, line, or pave with bricks.
        2
  • by Doomstalk (629173) on Friday January 18 2008, @05:49PM (#22102042)
    I "unbricked" my phone back in October. The iPhone development community built a utility that rebuilt your lockstate tables way back then. Welcome to the party Apple.
  • by Guy Harris (3803) <guy@alum.mit.edu> on Friday January 18 2008, @06:21PM (#22102446)
    Somehow the link to the story [arstechnica.com] appears to have gotten lost.
  • The TUAW reader who got his iPhone unbricked? Perl guru Randall Schwartz [stonehenge.com]. He posted the info on his Jaiku microblog [jaiku.com].

    I also hear through Chicago Sun Times writer Andy Ihnatko [cwob.com] that he's been able to unbrick a phone.
  • Responsible or not (Score:3, Interesting)

    by s4ltyd0g (452701) on Friday January 18 2008, @07:05PM (#22102996)
    Any company that installs firmware on a system in an unknown state "unintentionally" are morons. They've never heard of checksums? Don't trust your expensive iphone to them for updates because they're obviously not performing due diligence. I they can't detect a hacked phone before blindly installing, they will be unable to detect other problems/conditions which would break the phone when patched. As a matter of fact, were there not also
    a small number of non-hacked phones which got bricked as well?

  • Crap! (Score:3, Funny)

    by pizzach (1011925) <pizzach@@@gmail...com> on Friday January 18 2008, @08:47PM (#22104006) Homepage
    Crap! I managed to brick my iPhone into a firewall. But I didn't think that Windows CE-ME-NT would dry so quickly all over it! Seriously, the 2000 grade formula drys in XP amount of time. Please, feel free to brick me now with your brick iPhone that I know you think are now just useless bricks now. Mwa ha ha ha ha. Score.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      This isn't flamebait, I'm just saying this scared me away from buying an iPhone
      This isn't flamebait either, I'm just confused at your statement. The fact that Apple does not support hardware when the warranty has been intentionally voided scared you away? Or the fact that you are locked-in to AT&T with the iPhone?
          • by Luscious868 (679143) on Friday January 18 2008, @06:31PM (#22102558)

            No you don't the $20 is for software that will turn the iPod touch into a PDA. Including mail client etc, that should have been included from the start.

            Since the iPod touch is an iPod, and not a PDA, and since those features were not there to begin with and everybody who bought one knew that if they bothered to to do any research first, isn't $20 a small price to pay to add those features if you want them? Are you forced to spend the $20? Did Apple claim those features were there to begin with and then charge people $20 to get them?

              • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                WRONG. Punishing early adopters would be if Apple started adding these apps to NEW Touches, and NOT offering an upgrade to existing Touch owners at all.

                What happens when you buy a computer with Windows XP and then Vista comes out and you want the computer to have that instead? You have to pay to upgrade it, that's what. Even if its the same hardware... costing the SAME price (or less).

                Yes, it'd be very cool if manufacturers just doled out free software/feature updates for everyone in perpetuity... but that
      • by jareds (100340) on Friday January 18 2008, @06:35PM (#22102626)

        Until this firmware update was released, the bricked phones were "irrevocably" useless. [emphasis mine]

        You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

        Seriously, nothing indicates that these users updated the firmware by any abnormal method. The phone would be bricked if there were no way to get into recovery mode or whatever lets you update the firmware.

      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        good grief, listen to yourself!!!!

        "irrevocable" is an absolute term, just like "bricked". By very definition, if something is eventually revoked, it wasn't irrevocable.

        Please, go back to grade school. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.
    • Apple, you need to stop acting like assholes, and stop treating your customers like every last one is a worthless idiot.

      They aren't worthless idiots, they are what they are, and Apple treats them exactly how they should be treated.

      Fleecing are what sheep are for.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Apple's continued stance that they know what's best for their customers and that their products are 'perfect' as-is prevents what could be revolutionary products from ever reaching that potential.

      Um, WTF are you talking about?

      That they disavow any damage a firmware update will do to a modified piece of hardware? If that is the case, I would submit that 99.9% of companies are in the exact same class.

      If you are talking about the fact that an SDK is not out yet, wait a month til it is.

      If you are just turned off by Steve Jobs, that seems like a personal issue.

      but so long as they keep the snotty outlook on the world at large, they're just another tech company. Apple, you need to stop acting like assholes, and stop treating your customers like every last one is a worthless idiot.

      What are you *so* bitter about? I really don't understand this somewhat prevalent attitude that because they aren't supporting an unsupported

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      They can innovate to extraordinary levels in many ways, but so long as they keep the snotty outlook on the world at large, they're just another tech company. Apple, you need to stop acting like assholes, and stop treating your customers like every last one is a worthless idiot.

      Yeah! How dare they release a $20 upgrade to an MP3 player that turns it into a wifi-connected PDA! What jerks those guys are! The nerve of them! To show how big of jerks they are, they even went further and added those features to the new ones, for free! Someone should do something about this!

    • Re:Ugh. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Moonpie Madness (764217) on Friday January 18 2008, @07:01PM (#22102958)
      Dude, if you were wanting a bargain product, Apple simply isn't making anything for you.

      If you want a really nice product, particularly aesthetically nice, then Apple makes all kinds of shit you might like. But you have to give them MONEY for it.

      That software was not advertised as included in the ipod touch. So you didn't get screwed. If you want this version of the software, pay 20$. Of course, a lot of people get it through a different avenue.

      If you want a cheap PDA that has a lot of this functionality, you can get one pretty cheap. If $20 is a big deal for you.

      Apple is going to always do this. They've found a niche that is profitable, has decent clientele, is fun to manage. I think Apple isn't going to change. They will charge you more for everything, but make good stuff.