Slashdot Log In
Steve Jobs Hates Buttons
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Wed Jul 25, 2007 09:47 AM
from the also-buffy-hates-vampires dept.
from the also-buffy-hates-vampires dept.
ElvaWSJ writes "While many technology companies load their products up with buttons, Steve Jobs treats them as blemishes that add complexity and hinder their clean aesthetics.
The iPhone is Steve Jobs's attempt to crack a juicy new market for Apple Inc. But it's also part of a decades-long campaign by Mr. Jobs against a much broader target: buttons.
The new Apple cellphone famously does without the keypads that adorn its rivals. Instead, it offers a touch-sensing screen for making phone calls and tapping out emails. The resulting look is one of the sparest ever for Apple, a company known for minimalist gadgets. "
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Obviously... (Score:5, Funny)
How is the buttonless iphone to use (Score:3, Interesting)
I've got a little T-Mobile Dash/ HTC Excalibur and i can actually type really quickly on its tiny keyboard. I find it hard to believe that without feedback it could be better.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
What would really help is if all of iPhone's apps used the widescreen keyboard when you turn the unit sideways. For now it only does this in Safari (and it has to be in landscape mode before you brin
Seemed fast for me--here's why (Score:5, Interesting)
- No pressing required - Because I didn't need to press the buttons down--just touch them--it felt easier and faster to type. It's more of a smooth easy motion from button to button.
- Predictive targetting - In the middle of common words, I was able to trigger the correct next letter even if I didn't nail the button image exactly. I even experimented with it a bit, going successively faster and sloppier (aw yeah), and it was surprising how imprecise I could be and still get the word right or mostly right.
- Easy correction - With the touch screen and "magnifying glass" cursor control, it was easy to go back and correct mistakes after typing. So I found that it was best to just plow through typing the entire thing, and then go back and make corrections if needed.
It's definitely a different style. For me, typing on phones usually works best if I get it exactly right as I type. The iPhone is more like touch-typing on a regular keyboard--just blast through and correct after the fact if needed.
And like touch-typing, there is definitely a muscle-memory aspect to the iPhone. The keys don't have a feel to them, but they are always in the same place. I was faster after about 15 minutes because my fingers were "calibrated" to where the keys are. Those with good hand-eye coordination (gamers for instance) will have an easier time with this IMO.
Parent
Re:Seemed fast for me--here's why (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:How is the buttonless iphone to use (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Problem is.... (Score:5, Informative)
I design high end interfaces for home theaters (where the remote it's self costs around $2500.00US or more.) and the number one thing my customers like is not the fancy graphics, cool animations or nicely laid out controls on the touchscreen.. but the VOLUME CONTROL HARD BUTTONS built into the side edge. They like being able to without looking press volume up or down or mute instead of having to look at the screen and press a non tactile feedback graphical button.
Buttons have their use, you cant get rid of them.
2500$ for a remote? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
-Peter
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Informative)
I just checked with my friend who has an iPhone, and it -does- have hard buttons for volume on the side. So as much as he hates them, he didn't go crazy.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Buttons that have one label are used in conjunction with different modes to change properties not reflected in the labeling of the button...Basically, you have to memorize the manual because the interface is the opposite of intuitive.
It's that way with nearly all consumer electronics. There will be ten buttons but there will be a need for 30 buttons, to follow that button-centric design philosophy, but you can't put 30 buttons on it so the 10 buttons have to have 30 buttons worth of functionality, which means some buttons toggle the functionality of other buttons.
So, in a nutshell, though I am not completely fond of Apple's obsession with minimalist controls, they do an infinitely better job on their crappiest product than any piece of home A/V equipment I've ever seen. One look at a universal remote will tell you that.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:4, Informative)
A $2500 remote, and you make do with +/- buttons to adjust the volume? Augh! +/- buttons are a miserable way to adjust such an analogue function. Adjustment is either too slow (going up/down 1 dB per keypress) or too fast (when you hold the button down and the acceleration function kicks in).
A linear slider or a rotary knob is much better: it allows both fine control, and huge, fast adjustments (without too much overshoot) when needed.
As far as I know, there are only two remotes that get this right: the Philips SRU 9600 [philips.com], and Quad once had a remote like this.
I'm using a Griffin Powermate [griffintechnology.com] to control the volume when watching TV on my computer. It's brilliant.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Problem is button abuse, not buttons (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem with buttons is they take up space - physical space and cognitive space. Watch a 65 year old try and use a modern A/V system remote, and they're totally lost. It's like looking at the cockpit of a 707.
It's a problem, because while 90% of the people only use 10% of the features, you have to be able to access the other 90% of the features. How many times do you change the surround sound mode of your home stereo? I did it once per input, then never did it again. So why do those buttons still take up space on my remote?
The harmony remote is one attempt at reducing the complexity - you trade complexity up front (you need to program the remote with your devices) for simplicity later. The above mentioned 65 year old had no problem watching TV with the harmony remote - on a system an order of magnitude more complicated than his.
The higher-end models have almost no buttons; they have screens that overload. In fact, you really only need four or five for a TV remote: volume up, volume down, channel up, channel down, power, change input. Sure, the number keys are nice, but they aren't necessary.
However, a more sophisticated remote costs more money. Simplicity always costs more up front, but pays off every day because there's less aggravation. Buttons are cheap. Removing buttons is expensive.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Informative)
The iPhone, just like the Mac, has plenty of buttons.
There are just not many hardware buttons. Really. Bear with me...
Compare the number of buttons in MS-DOS (or other CLI) interfaces against those on the Mac. The "menus" of a CLI interfacer are like menus at Chinese restaurant. Except, of course, with a CLI you can't point and say "I want this."
But wait! There's more! A standard Microsoft alert dialog box -- Windows and Mac OS -- typically has a longwinded description of the problem and the same two buttons to respond with: No and Yes. I have an example right here from MS Word for Mac OS X:
The line "Continue with Save" in itself is rather vague; the user must plow through a lengthly bit of prose (for a GUI) to ascertain just what is going to happen. I'm convinced that Microsoft if using FUD to bully the user to always save their documents in Word format. Changing from any other format to Word format never generates a scary warning.
Contrast Microsoft buttons to Mac buttons using TextEdit. Changing an RTF document to text the dialog reads:
The differences are striking:
The meaning of Yes and No are only clear within context. In many, if not most, Microsoft applications, if you choose No, it may not stop, it may go on and do something different. I find most everybody tends to stop and read that lengthly prose to make sure what is going to happen if it's something they haven't done in a while; there's just too much information to gather in at a glance.
"Convert this document to plain text?" Ah, it's going to... well, the answer is in the question.
Buttons? It's not how many that's important, it's how soft and clear they are.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:4, Funny)
Sure, if they were my customers spending $2500 on a remote, I would value their opinions most highly.
Would you like an extra button on that button sir?
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Funny)
The nipple. All other interfaces are learned.
Parent
You'd think so... (Score:5, Informative)
Pretty much every interface is a learned interface, but the simpler the interface, the easier it is to learn.
Parent
Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Insightful)
The TiVo remote control is just that. A device that remotely controls another device. You're paying attention to your TV. You shouldn't need to take your eyes off it to change the volume.
The iPhone isn't a remote control. It's the device you're using, so there's the presumption that you'll be looking at it with some sort of regularity while you use it.
Parent
Blemishes (Score:5, Funny)
Alternate Keypad (Score:5, Funny)
On an iPhone, you have to press an additional button that opens up an alternate keypad that will allow you to type numbers and punctuation. So typing something as simple as elipses (...) requires you to tap your finger 9 times. Enjoy your phone, losers! People like me who have shit to do will stick to a keyboard that doesn't have its lips wrapped firmly to the user-interface equivalent of a throbbing dong
Maddox's Take on the iPhone and... BUTTONS (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=i
Fastest dupe ever (Score:5, Funny)
CmdrTaco managed to break the record of fastest dupe by duping first sentence in the same headline.
Buttons as Features (Score:5, Informative)
I see his point, but OTOH, there are times when buttons ARE preferable. I can text a message on my cellphone without looking at the phone because there is a tactile reference to where each key is located. This is quite handy (pun intended!) Try texting a message inconspicuously at your next boring meeting.
Re:Buttons as Features (Score:5, Funny)
So you're the guy who sent me the message "AKI( Ekdlu WO.T 67Grtgixool;"?
Parent
Of Course He Does (Score:5, Funny)
It's no coincidence that he always wears a mock turtleneck sweater with no buttons to kill him on the front and a pair of zippered jeans.
You think Ballmer's a nut, you should see Jobs talk to his employees: "For every button I find on this interface, I shall kill you
chicken or egg? (Score:5, Funny)
How do you turn off the monitor?
It's easy, you just use the touch screen button there.
Oh, then how do you turn it back on?
Re:chicken or egg? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Tactile Feedback (Score:5, Interesting)
In the EU there is already legislation to make software, websites and devices accessible. The buttonless iPhone must score pretty low on the accessibility scale.
Re:Tactile Feedback (Score:5, Interesting)
Why should the other 99% of the population abstain from it?
I'm all for developing devices that make life easier for disabled people.
I'm very strongly against making life more difficult or limited for the rest of us in order to cater to them.
Parent
Pushing conventions has its rewards (Score:3, Insightful)
iMac -- made the "minimalist" move of omitting the floppy. I remember thinking at the time back in the late 90's this would create a data island, and being quite uncomfortable with the decision -- today, most would feel this was a smart move, and the ubiquitous USB drive has replaced the clunky floppy. Overall, a success.
Mouse -- keeps on pushing the minimalist single button. I detest this, and know many people (linux, mac, and pc users) that feel the same. Another button simply adds to the functionality -- I right click several hundred times per day, and don't want combo presses or holding down to approximate this. Overall, I view this as a bad move.
iPhone -- we'll see the verdict regarding this. I, for one, would appreciate a "hang up" button as I tend to push this a million times when I want to hang up... it is nice to have a solid feeling as you wait for the UI to respond. With a softkey, did you really hit it? Did the UI register it? You don't know without watching the screen. I view this as a bit extreme, but we will see if people complain. Buttons have their place when well-implemented.
Can you imagine getting on a "soft-key" elevator? I think it would be cool at first, then really annoying.
I'm happy that Apple pushes technology like this, but only in ways that force adoption of a better technology.
Ah well, we can all "vote with our wallet..."
Doesn't hate buttons. Hates Genericy (Score:5, Interesting)
The iPhone does in fact have five physical buttons - a sleep/wake button, a home button, a volume up/down button, and a silencer (OK, technically that's a switch).
But then you are discounting the noise less real, even if lacking physical feedback, buttons that appear on the screen in each application, tailored to each task. If these are not real buttons, than neither are membrane style buttons as on the Timex-Sinclair ZX-81 of old.
That tailoring is what Apple really likes, being able to arrange input aspects just so for each task. Perhaps the best example of this is the keyboard for the web browser on the iPhone; why have a space bar when entering URL's? This is replaced by "/" and ".com" keys which makes a tremendous amount of sense.
Apple loves task focused UI, and a mostly virtual button approach allows them to get closer to that than would be otherwise possible on a smaller consumer device built to perform a number of very different tasks.
When did Jobs morph into Steve Martin? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Not to say I don't like My Nokia E62 - it's great to be able to ssh myself out of a problem - and I am even considering a E61i when my phone operator is ready to give me one for free.
While very interesting, I will wait for an Apple-supported iPhone development toolchain before seriously consid
Re:Buttons!? (Score:4, Funny)
Ummm... that last point. Is there a phone... ah, never mind.
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Informative)
As for your texting with the phone in your pocket.....I'm not one to question the habits of others but that is a new one on me.
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes.
Most people can drive safely under normal conditions on the phone. Most people can drive safely under normal conditions with a BAC up to 0.15 or even 0.20. Most people can drive safely at 20-30mph over the posted speed limit.
Driving laws exist for the "not most" situations, however. Some people can't safely drive a monotonously straight road on a clear day while sober and well-slept. Roads occasionally get icy (in the North). Kids (or deer) sometimes jump out in front of your car with no warning (hey, I'd call that "Evolution", but the pesky legal system tends to call it "involuntary manslaughter"). People age and their eyes and reflexes get worse.
Put bluntly, we cripple the majority rather than take away the licenses of the 10% or so who should never get behind the wheel in the first place.
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Informative)
scientific studies have proven that talking on a phone while driving is dangerous even when completely hands free. even more so than a real life conversation because the lower quality signal requires more concentration to process.
these are scientifically proven facts. I notice that you, on the other hand, only seem to offer the fact that you haven't killed anyone yet as evidence of your super-human brain functions.
Parent
Re:Yea, We Need More Thinking Like This... (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Yea, We Need More Thinking Like This... (Score:4, Interesting)
Back when I was a teen, you HAD to learn to drive with a multitude of distractions. We used to joke that the driving test for gals would be driving while putting the makeup on...but, for guys, you had to pass the driving test consisting of driving down the street with a beer can in your lap, a cigarette in one hand while you shifted gears and fiddled with the stereo with the other one.
It got even more complex if your girlfriend was in the front seat with ya...as that you were also trying to keep an hand on her too...
Bah...if you learned to drive like the old days....adding a cellphone to the mix is nothing!!
Parent
Re:Buttons!? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Mrs. Jobs is a lucky woman (Score:4, Funny)
Parent