Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Jobs Unfazed by Zune

Posted by Hemos on Mon Oct 16, 2006 09:22 AM
from the well-he-would-say-that dept.
Media Media (Apple)
twofish writes "In an interview at Newsweek marking the approaching 5th anniversary of the launch of the iPod, Apple CEO Steve Jobs seems unconcerned by Microsoft's wannabe iPod killer Zune. Earphone sharing will prove a more potent force for social networking than the iPod rival's wireless song-sharing feature, he reckons. 'I've seen the demonstrations on the internet about how you can find another person using a Zune and give them a song they can play three times. It takes forever,' he says in the article. 'By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left! You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Jobs Unfazed by Zune 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • It always amazes me how smoothly Jobs manages to deliver presentations, even when he's put on the spot. And without any of the dodging and doublespeak you expect from most company execs.

    I know a lot of Slashdotters hate iTunes for "DRM", "not HD(TV) quality", "too expensive", or whatever other B.S. excuse they can come up with, but...
    Q: No, but you've asked them not to raise their prices, when some of them wanted to.
    A: Our core initial strategy on the store was that if you want to stop piracy, the way to stop it is by competing with it, by offering a better product at a fair price. In essence, we would make a deal with people. If they would pay a fair price, we would give them a better product and they would stop being pirates
    ...THIS is why I support iTunes. They know they have to be competitive in the market, so they are. They keep prices acceptable, even in face of stupid, greedy record companies. Jobs makes no bones about it, and he tells both the labels and the consumers the same thing. There are no "backroom deals" going on here, just a company trying to deliver the best product possible at a price the market can afford.

    You won't find that sort of business done at Microsoft. Their strategy is:

    1. Announce a competing product with limitless fanfare. Doesn't matter if it sucks.
    2. Slowly improve it until the market finds it semi-acceptable.
    3. Leverage the Windows monopoly to CRUSH the competition.

    Didn't you hear? You can only use iPods with a Mac. With Zuma, you can be compatible with the millions of Microsoft Vista machines, out of the box! Plus, you know you're getting Microsoft Quality(TM) and Support(TM) when you purchase a Zuma. Those other digital music companies could fold tomorrow, leaving you with no music and no refund. Only Microsoft products can provide you with a guaranteed safety net! </standard-Microsoft-bull>

    I've seen the demonstrations on the Internet about how you can find another person using a Zune and give them a song they can play three times. It takes forever. By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left! You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable.

    You know, he's got a point. It might seem very impressive in a geeky way to Zuma a file across the room to the pretty girl (if you don't mind that I just used "Zuma" as a verb), but she is definitely not going to be impressed unless she's also a geek. You've also got the matter of the song being played in a vacuum, where your own thoughts and feelings on the tune are missing. Thus it holds no meaning. Besides, pod-jacking [wikipedia.org] gives you a much better chance of being able to talk to that pretty girl. ;-)

    • Good comments, but Jobs does have his own bits of doublespeak. When he says that customers aren't asking for compatibility he's either defining his terms VERY carefully or he's in denial.

      On the other hand he can't say "we can't adopt Microsoft's proprietary DRM instead of our own proprietary DRM because: (A) Microsoft will crush us, and (B) Microsoft's DRM is too effective for customers to put up with... the main reason we can get away with what we're doing in the iTunes Store is because everyone knows our DRM is little more than 'honor system'."

      Though it would be refreshing to hear that/ He could go on with "You know, back before we introduced DRM I pointed out that DRM is basically impossible to make more than 'honor system' anyway, and our success really proves how right I was."

      • Re:Doublespeak he can't avoid... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Have Blue (616) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:05AM (#16452873) Homepage
        He's right that, by and large, customers aren't asking for compatibility. Nerds on Slashdot are asking for compatibility. The millions upon millions of laymen who bought the lion's share of iPods barely even realize it's an issue.

      • Re:Doublespeak he can't avoid... (Score:4, Insightful)

        by PygmySurfer (442860) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:36AM (#16453297)
        On the other hand he can't say "we can't adopt Microsoft's proprietary DRM instead of our own proprietary DRM because: (A) Microsoft will crush us, and (B) Microsoft's DRM is too effective for customers to put up with... the main reason we can get away with what we're doing in the iTunes Store is because everyone knows our DRM is little more than 'honor system'."

        Maybe it's actually (C) Microsoft fucked everybody over who went with their PlaysForSure DRM, but we saw it coming, and developed our own system (probably not the reason, but it would be perfectly valid).

        I think Apple knows it's DRM is really a joke, but it's enough to appease the RIAA. Much as Jobs might want to throw that into the RIAAs face, I think he knows the RIAA would be too stupid to agree, and there's no way they'd let Apple strip the DRM from the iTunes store.

    • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Mr. Underbridge (666784) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:39AM (#16452527)

      *Sigh* Another victim of the Reality Distortion Field (TM).

      You know, he's got a point. It might seem very impressive in a geeky way to Zuma a file across the room to the pretty girl (if you don't mind that I just used "Zuma" as a verb), but she is definitely not going to be impressed unless she's also a geek. You've also got the matter of the song being played in a vacuum, where your own thoughts and feelings on the tune are missing. Thus it holds no meaning. Besides, pod-jacking gives you a much better chance of being able to talk to that pretty girl. ;-)

      You know damned well that when (not if) iPod comes out with wireless, his tune on that will change in a hurry. Kind of like Intel was slow until Apple was using it.

      Of course, he'll have an answer about how impersonal wireless was until Apple did it. And he'll be partly right. But for now, wireless is a Zuma advangage - right now, the guy can podjack (zumajack?) the pretty girl, then when she likes the song, he can Zuma it to her. That would be pretty cool. MS should let users associate a text message with the song, that would be better. Also, would be even cooler if it didn't disappear immediately, but whatever.

      I like my iPod and my powerbook, but Steve's just a little *too* slick for me. It makes me not trust anything he says, whether he's right or wrong, simply because if you let yourself get caught up in his spin, you *will* believe whatever he says.

      • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:5, Insightful)

        by rlthomps-1 (545290) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:55AM (#16452737) Homepage
        You're actually missing Steve's point. He's not saying wireless sharing of music isn't a useful feature, he's saying that it's too complicated to be useful right now. So yes, he'll change his tune but only after Apple finds a way to do it "right".

        • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:5, Informative)

          by shashi (56458) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:21AM (#16453085) Homepage

          That's basically what Jobs has done all along. He's shown that he's never one to completely disregard in the future what doesn't work today. He's just a perfectionist and doesn't want to throw in the latest bells and whistles until he feels it is ready for your everyday user to consume. That's one thing that Microsoft doesn't get—they want the most features possible and so they end up releasing a lot of stuff, that while it sounds cool, often doesn't work as advertised until a couple of service packs later.

          I also wanted to address a point from the grandparent, which your point actually addresses (albeit a little broadly):

          You know damned well that when (not if) iPod comes out with wireless, his tune on that will change in a hurry. Kind of like Intel was slow until Apple was using it.

          That's a bit of a misinformed statement. Intel was slow. PowerPC was kicking Intel ass up through the early G4's. Unfortunately, IBM didn't keep up with R&D for their consumer PowerPC chips to stay competitive with Intel. So, like a good businessman, Jobs did was right for the consumer and switched his product to use the more competitive parts.

          I assure you that once Steve Jobs feels the time is right for things like iPod wireless, or iPhone, or whatever else "everyone" is clamoring for, he'll do it.

          • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:4, Interesting)

            by ronanbear (924575) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:57AM (#16453581)
            Zune's wireless sharing isn't a killer app. Jobs knows this. Ballmer should. From a technical standpoint all the ingredients are already in place in the Zune for this to be genuinely useful. Random wireless p2p sharing isn't really practical. Where the wireless sharing would be really useful would be having a base station in Starbucks, GAP, airports etc where you could download songs for free. The M$ DRM there makes more sense. But that would require a pull model instead of Microsofts push model.

            You could still have a song of the day to allow people to try out new music. Record stores might like something like that. Instead of listening to headphones in a store you push a button which sends the song to any zunes within range (which accept it). You get 3 chances to decide if you like it and then buy the song. But, such usage is totally at odds with Microsofts marketing.

            In fairness, Apple have made similar mistakes at times. Podcasting started and grew without them. They were very quick to tap into it though which comes back to your point about Jobs being a perfectionist who doesn't want to release something until it works perfectly. Incidentally the Zune sharing wouldn't fit too well with the iTS as it functions currently. It would however be perfect for the wide range of playsforsure stores.

          • I'm still waiting for my iNewton. That'll be sweet.
        • [Jobs is] saying that it's too complicated to be useful right now

          Give the man a prize. This was exactly Jobs' point. He didn't say anything to suggest that he's opposed to the idea of wireless transfers, just that the Zune sucks at it. If the iPod were to add this feature, it would probably require you to cross the room, stand next to the girl (again, giving you that chance to talk to her), and very simply and painlessly initiate the file transfer. Knowing Apple, you'd probably be able to broadcast your current playlist to nearby iPods, allows you to pod-jack without even pod-jacking. Which would be in support of existing market needs (something which Apple excels at) rather than trying to force a feature onto the market that no one is asking for.
        • The kind of women you can take to White Castle and then sleep with usually are best not seen by the light of the rising son. Only makes sense to beat feet while the eeevil Mr. Yellowface is away.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Tim C (15259)
      I know a lot of Slashdotters hate iTunes for "DRM", "not HD(TV) quality", "too expensive", or whatever other B.S. excuse they can come up with

      Well, it's a bit off topic, but personally I dislike (but still use) iTunes because it's a resource hog. I don't own an iPod, and so it really shouldn't need to have an iPod helper service running continuously. It definitely shouldn't have an iTunesHelper process running continuously either.

      Yes, you can kill the processes, but iTunes will just start them back up again

      • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Trillan (597339) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:36AM (#16453303) Homepage Journal
        It always amazes me that users who are running a Microsoft operating system with dozens of services and executables active applications - and even more services-like behavior concealed within services or system libraries - would object to iTunesHelper.

      • Re:Incredible Speaker (Score:5, Funny)

        by d0n quix0te (304783) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:40AM (#16453357)

        >Most people would never put someone's elses earbud into their own ear, I know I would never do so.

        Dude, no wonder you don't get sex! It involves inserting.... naughty bits into other naughty bits.... And don't even get me started on foreplay.... and other forms of sexual entertainment... I am glad you are not averse putting your penis in your hand. ;-)

  • In other news ... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Bewbewbew (871127) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:25AM (#16452321) Homepage
    Teenage girls all over America issue restraining orders against Steve Jobs, related to his attempts to "share his earphones" with them.

  • The master has spoken... (Score:5, Funny)

    by creimer (824291) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:25AM (#16452325) Homepage
    'By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left! You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable.'

    Dating advice for using the iPod?! Let's see Bill Gates top that with the Zune!

  • How Is This News? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by eldavojohn (898314) * <my/.username@@@gmail.com> on Monday October 16 2006, @09:26AM (#16452327) Homepage Journal
    Apple: Jobs Unfazed by Zune ... from the well-he-would-say-that dept.
    How is this news?

    Of course he's 'unfazed' by the Zune. He sits atop a company that currently has massive (and, more importantly, very loyal) fanbase in both computers and portable media players.

    Microsoft is new to this market and I doubt jobs will be afraid of anybody (even Microsoft) in this market. Hell, I'll bet Jobs isn't even concerned about iRiver's or Sony's products even though they seem to have been in the market longer.

    What was he supposed to do? Halt all production and support of iPods at the sight of the Zune and declare that he's beaten? Is he supposed to assume the fetal position and cower and cry when he hears the word 'Zune?' Retreat to the northern woods where he trains night and day so that one day he might come back and beat Microsoft in some other fashion?

    I would be shocked if Jobs said anything otherwise. What's our next headline for Slashdot? Is it going to be "Steve Ballmer's Kids Love Zune"? What about "Jobs Says New Mac Models Are Good"? You gotta keep up those hard hitting headlines.

    The questions in this article are laughable! Interviewer: "Jobs, I've pitched you so many softball questions but in an effort to pitch you another, how can the iPod lose its popularity with Dick Cheney and Queen Elizabeth owning one?" Jobs: "It can't, but let me attempt to be modest as you pop a woody for me." Interviewer: "I know you've only sold millions of iPods so let me attempt to further illustrate how great it is, will it always be about the music?" Jobs: "It's about whatever makes it sell the most."

    Stop humping his leg!

    I think the only way you could worry Jobs is if you made a media device that physically pleasures the user (with nods to Stanislaw Lem). Although Jobs could just fire back that the video playing iPod requires some effort but can meet the same needs.
    • How is this news?

      I would be shocked if Jobs said anything otherwise. What's our next headline for Slashdot? Is it going to be "Steve Ballmer's Kids Love Zune"? What about "Jobs Says New Mac Models Are Good"? You gotta keep up those hard hitting headlines.

      How is this news? Simple: By reading between the lines.

      Every company delivers the same BS of, "We think our competitor provides no real challenge in the market." But if you actually listen to what they're saying, you can hear what they really think about it. Sort of like how Ballmer's denials of Google's importance always come across as, "I want to throw a f#@$ing CHAIR at those Google DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS!"

  • Add feature when they can make them work. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jellomizer (103300) * on Monday October 16 2006, @09:29AM (#16452377)
    Apples Strength is that they tend to only add features that people really need and can use. Microsoft just takes whatever people complain about not having and shove it in there doesn't matter if it is really useful or not. Apple knows that people wants wireless access to their iPod but apple won't put it in there until they can find a way to make it right, so it is actually a benefit vs. an expensive feature that people won't use, more then just past the for 1/2 hour for the ohhs and ahhs.
    Lets take a look at virtual screens. OS X is just releasing this as a new feature in its OS next year, Unix/Linux has had this feature for decades. Why now did apple finally release it. Well because there is enough CPU/GPU power to make it so people can understand it and not call and complain about there windows being missing. Or not seeing where they put what. It is about not releasing a feature until it can be made useful. Not just putting in a feature half hazardly jest because people who like buzzwords say they want it.
    • Apples Strength is that they tend to only add features that people really need and can use. Microsoft just takes whatever people complain about not having and shove it in there doesn't matter if it is really useful or not. Apple knows that people wants wireless access to their iPod but apple won't put it in there until they can find a way to make it right, so it is actually a benefit vs. an expensive feature that people won't use, more then just past the for 1/2 hour for the ohhs and ahhs.
      Lets take a look at virtual screens. OS X is just releasing this as a new feature in its OS next year, Unix/Linux has had this feature for decades. Why now did apple finally release it. Well because there is enough CPU/GPU power to make it so people can understand it and not call and complain about there windows being missing. Or not seeing where they put what. It is about not releasing a feature until it can be made useful. Not just putting in a feature half hazardly jest because people who like buzzwords say they want it.


      I like your points. It brings to mind two students that have to write a term paper that has to be 50 pages. One student fills it with crap and changes the font size and spacing until it reaches that 50 pages, thereby fullfilling the minimum. The other student ignores the 50 page requirement and just researches the subject and writes until the paper makes sense. The teacher with any brains (or interest in the subject matter) is going to grade the second student higher. Not all teachers have any brains. Big corporations and especially governments won't take anything other than 50 pages and won't really read it anyway.

      Apple did its homework with the iPod and worked hard for that A. Microsoft glanced over to copy as much as it could, slapped something together, put a pretty font on it, slapped some stickers on it and put it in a nice brown binder. Microsoft gets the C.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by gEvil (beta) (945888)
      I think you've pretty much hit it here. Yes, the iPod will eventually support wireless. But when it does, it will support many of the useful features that people are complaining that the Zune doesn't support, such as wireless syncing with your host machine and wireless downloads of purchases. The wireless sharing ability that the Zune features is kind of a nice idea, but it's more gimmicky than anything, IMHO. More like it's another "feature" to add to the side of the box than anything that people will use.

  • Huh? (Score:5, Funny)

    by iworm (132527) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:31AM (#16452403)
    You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear.

    Why not just keep both earbuds where they are, enjoy the music, and still stick it in her ear? Or am I misunderstanding something here...?

    • Re:Huh? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 16 2006, @09:47AM (#16452631)
      I think you're missing an R near the end of your first sentence. That's okay, though, as the sentence parses correctly when spoken aloud.

  • Apple being unfazed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Grahl (8946) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:31AM (#16452421) Homepage
    Wasn't there a time when Apple was unfazed by IBM-PCs? :>

  • Zune's wifi sharing = Palm's Business Card Beaming (Score:5, Insightful)

    by d0n quix0te (304783) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:36AM (#16452495)
    Just as geeky as the 90's version of uncool, tragically unhip, business dudes and engineers beaming business cards to each other. The novelty will wear off after 2 tries. The only people who will do it are going to be geeks... Oh wait, the geeks are going to buy an Ogg Vorbis player made by a Taiwanese company that nobody's heard off....

    The only people who will use this feature are going to be the dorks working in Microsoft's Zune division who came up with this non-feature... well, at least until they get laid off....

    • Re:Zune's wifi sharing = Palm's Business Card Beam (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Slurms (144553) on Monday October 16 2006, @09:54AM (#16452729)
      Wireless sharing for the Zune is not about sharing songs with a girl in a bar. It is entirely about giving Starbucks a means for sending you commercials disguised as "zune-casts" when you walk into their shop.
    • There's nothing cool about handing out business cards whether it's physical paper or digital data. Cool isn't even on the screen.

      Beaming cards was mainstream... I had a wrecker driver wave a palm at me when he was towing my car in 2000... until the iPaq finally got a fast enough processor in the ARM to make Microsoft's handheld OS usable, and Palm lost the plot and tried to turn the Palm into the same kind of "laptop replacement" device Microsoft was pushing. Pocket PCs wrecked beaming.

      Why?

      The Pocket PC makes beaming business cards a cumbersome trial that only the geeky can handle. You had to navigate multiple menus, switch modes in the receiving device, and wait, and wait. The Palm made it simple and automatic... just hold one button down and it Just Works, and works *quickly*.

      So the question is... will the Zune make beaming music "a cumbersome trial" or "simple and automatic"? How long will it take?

  • Uploading not Sharing (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Peregr1n (904456) <ian.a.ferguson@gmail.com> on Monday October 16 2006, @10:04AM (#16452859) Homepage
    I think Steve Job has intentionally missed the point. Yes, the whole sharing thing is pointless and won't be used. But Wi-Fi will be the future (hopefully for iPods too) for uploading music to the device and playing back to speakers.

    For example, I play music from my MacBook wirelessly to my speakers through my AirPort Express (yes, I'm an Apple fanboy) a lot. I really wish I could do the same, but from my iPod, so I don't have to power up the MacBook. If iPod had Wi-Fi - ta da! Problem solved.

    I think Steve knows this is the future but is spreading a little FUD about the Zune. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the next generation of video iPod has wi-fi - carefully timed to arrive with the iTV - so it can play video wirelessly too. It's the next logical step.

  • The dangers of icky ear buds (Score:5, Funny)

    by dpbsmith (263124) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:06AM (#16452879) Homepage
    If I were Ballmer, I would seek out an opportunity to comment on the doubtless many medical studies that have shown that ear wax, mites, bacteria, Avian flu virus, cooties, parasites, AIDS, those icky crayfish-like ear thingies from "Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan," the gay gene, and terrist nucular WMD materials remain on ear bud surfaces, no matter how clean they seem to be.

  • Subtext? (Score:4, Funny)

    by Doug Neal (195160) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:27AM (#16453179) Journal
    So what he's really saying is essentially "you're much more likely to get laid with an iPod than a Zune"...

  • Jobs and Apple, have it right - for now. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by joshsnow (551754) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:37AM (#16453315) Journal
    It takes forever,' he says in the article. 'By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left! You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable.'"

    This kind of common sense thinking demonstrates why Apple are still so far ahead of their competitors - even when equivalent music players offer more, on paper, than the iPod equivalent at a similar price point.

    The technology is always hidden behind the usability and is only included if it's absolutely necessary. That's a good enough reason for me to continue buying iPods.

  • Piracy is the Competition... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SnowDog74 (745848) on Monday October 16 2006, @11:17AM (#16453873)
    A: Our core initial strategy on the store was that if you want to stop piracy, the way to stop it is by competing with it, by offering a better product at a fair price. In essence, we would make a deal with people. If they would pay a fair price, we would give them a better product and they would stop being pirates


    I've been making this point repeatedly since 1996. This simple fact... that Jobs chose to view piracy as competition, is the single most important reason for iTunes Store's, and consequently Apple's, success.

    In a sense, the song is free. The user is paying for convenience (robust UI), fidelity (AAC vs. MP3) and selection that the P2P services cannot provide. Whether you want to call this a form of RDF-ing the features/benefits, the fact is that people do pay for design, convenience and selection.

    For this reason, tracing back to Jobs' philosophy of Piracy-IS-Competition (as opposed to the "Throw Tons of Lawsuits to the Wall and See What Sticks" approach), Apple distributes more volume than all P2P services combined... even though their product is free.

    Because of the product-software integration Apple has, they have a degree of quality control Microsoft cannot touch. Microsoft does not understand hardware the way Apple does. They see hardware as a repository for their bloatware. Whereas Apple sees software as a means to enable hardware to do things related to productivity and entertainment, but the hardware itself must be built to appeal to the consumer's needs, not the shareholder's.

  • Just got this from a friend: (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ptomblin (1378) <ptomblin@xcski.com> on Monday October 16 2006, @11:22AM (#16453933) Homepage Journal
    You know that Zune allows you to send songs to another Zune over wireless?

    Although you, as a Zune owner, can block particular Zunes from sending stuff to you, other Zunes start off in an unblocked state. Do you know what Microsoft have done? They've invented a new kind of spam. Companies will hack the standard and create a box which will automatically find every Zune in the vicinity and send their (audio/video) adverts to them.

    You'll have Zune users in public places swearing at the constant interruptions and hitting the 'do not accept' button.

  • How Zune's Wireless Should Work... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by OverDrive33 (468610) * on Monday October 16 2006, @11:23AM (#16453967) Homepage Journal
    Sitting on the subway, listening to my Zune when I hear a quick couple beeps during my song. My Zune is telling me another Zune just entered my wireless radius. I jump to the wireless screen with one button, and see the user 'Loves2Splooge' has 1242 songs to share. I am able to browse his list as easily as I browse mine - I can even preview the song wirelessly before transfering to my Zune. I take about 30 tracks and permanently store them to my Zune.

    THAT would be an iPod killer... what makes it sad is that it's only the stupid software that limits the aforementioned ideas. I hope someone is able to come out with a custom OS that enables users to do just what I've described.

  • steve can be wrong... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by micromuncher (171881) on Monday October 16 2006, @11:26AM (#16454013)
    If you look at explosions in other gadgets and human nature... Steve is wrong about Zune's music sharing. Here is why...

    Kids love cell phones. They love text messaging. They also love text messaging on their computers. One common theme is to express their individuality by publishing What they're listening to right now. Sometimes in a chat they'll even include a link to the song. Couple this with increasing introverted behavior. Kids will love the ability to share a song via wireless. There is this innate need to get inside the headspace...

    Sharing a headphone requires an unwanted and unwelcome [physical] contact.

    The Zune wireless can be extended to do more than share music. Its personal publishing.
    • What if I put my tesla coil in a red wagon and wheeled it down hip-20-something street on friday night, asking girls if I could borrow electricity to make toast?
       
      What if I wore a Jack Skellington costume?
    • Basically, there are very few reasons to buy a Zune. One of the things Microsoft has touted is the ability to share a song in a limited fashion via wireless.

      Jobs is saying that process is cumbersome. Rather than transfer the song from device-to-device, users are much more likely to physically pass their device over to their friend, let them listen, feel happy, and go about their day.

      Yes, the Zune can also do this. But, that isn't a *reason* to buy a Zune over an iPod.

      He's simply stating that the marketing h

    • Re:I find this quite funny (Score:5, Insightful)

      by pla (258480) on Monday October 16 2006, @10:42AM (#16453381) Journal
      Does anybody really not think wireless will soon be a mandatory feature for all portable media players?

      Well, yes, but functional wireless - MS screwed the pooch with the Zune, by not letting it show up directly on your WLAN as a CIFS share (possibly even with some device-side browsing ability so you can pull music down rather than needing to push it from your fileserver or a third machine), instead limiting it to the all-but-useless "share for three listens" feature.

      Now, as for Steverino's comment - The Zune's wireless, useful or not, exists in addition to a headphone jack. Not "instead of" (I'd like to see how that would work ;-) ). So you can still share a bud with a bud, if so desired (or somewhat more hygienic - ick, sharing earbuds, how nasty - use a 2-way headphone splitter and jack in the second set at the same time).


      But for the REALLY interesting question - I slammed both MS and Apple here... Will the fanboys' heads explode before they can mod this into obvlivion?

    • Re:I'm with Taco (Score:5, Insightful)

      by noewun (591275) on Monday October 16 2006, @11:21AM (#16453927) Journal
      What does it have that all the mp3 players that cane out before and cost less lack?

      Ease of use and style. Unfortunately, these things mean very little to some of Slashdot's technocentric readership, so they are constantly overlooked as unimportant, or, at times, it is implied that anyone who chooses ease of use and style over maximum features and geek cred is stupid.

      The iPod succeeds because it tackles a very narrow set of problems very well. It makes managing and listening to large music (and now video) libraries very, very easy. It doesn't try to pack in a lot of the bells and whistles which would detract from its primary purpose. Because of this, the people who designed the hardware and software were able to focus their efforts on a very few tasks instead of trying to tie together several separate and disparate functions on one machine. Why is this important?

      Because most consumers want a device which is 1) easy to understand and 2) easy to use. The technofetishism which attracts a lot of the serious geek crowd is of no value to them. So, while the iPod wasn't the first mp3 player, and it lacks features found on some other players, the combination of the iPod, iTunes and good industrial design makes for a killer combo. My technologically clueless brother can use his iPod with no problems and no confusion. He doesn't have to read much of a m anual to use one, or pop through a lot of mensnus in a creaky interface. He can simply copy all his playlists from iTunes to the iPod and listen. The reason for the iPod's success us that the Nomad is a device. The iPod is a well thought out product.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.