Sony Music CD's Contain Mac DRM Software Too 399
brjndr writes "A MacInTouch poster has found that certain Sony CD's also contain a smaller extra partition for 'enhanced' content. Running one of the applications found within this partition installs kernel extensions containing DRM software by SunnComm. In Sony's defense you're told what is being installed within a EULA which pops up when the program is loaded. Thankfully we all read our EULAs completely."
Think different... (Score:5, Interesting)
To summarise: it's impossible to protect against truly clueless users without severely inconveniencing everyone else, but Mac OS X at least lets you know something dodgy is going on (a request for administration rights, just to play a CD, say what ? No *other* CD's needed that!) I guess it helps to have gorms, though...
THM: It's a difference in attitude. It *does* make a difference.
Simon
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not *so* sure about the after-a-while thing though - I'm struggling to remember any time I had to type in the sysadmin password when I wasn't installing software. If I equate that action with installing stuff, and all I've done is put a CD in to play the damn thing, I'd be pretty curious as to why... Maybe that's just cynical old me, though...
Simon
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
You'd have to make it more of a quiz. After all, there's a lot of people that think they know everything but who really don't have a clue (Go to your local computer shop if you don't believe me). It could be pretty funny:
(1) what does RAM stand for?
(2) what is 0xF?
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Think different... (Score:4, Funny)
Memories... (Score:4, Funny)
My original
Snort...
Re:Memories... (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd really like to get my hands on one of those now. I sort of miss slapping it upside the carriage every time you were finishing a line. And a typo at the end of a page REALLY hurt.
Re:Memories... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Memories... (Score:3, Interesting)
[Note lowercase L used for authenticity
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's the problem. Clueless mac user is probably expecting to be installing software about then. The CD told them they need a player to see the dancing pigs, for example.
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't need to authenticate to install applications on Mac OS X. Installing applications - like Microsoft Office - involves just dragging the application (or the folder it's in) from the CD into the Applications folder on your hard disk. Even things like Real One Player and Windows Media Player work this way.
When you do actually get a dialog, Mac OS X also tells you what permissions are being requested on the password dialog (e.g. full admin access, or just permission to modify a specific system setting, etc) as well as which application is requesting the permission. In reality, most of the time people see a dialog in Mac OS X which requires authentication, it's because of an interaction with the OS itself (such as changing a system setting) that the user has just performed.
If a users sees an Application (including plugins) requesting this sort of permission that should really ring alarm bells. Only things like new drivers (e.g. for that new camera you just bought) should be asking for things like that.
It's fair to say here is room for some improvement in the dialog in that it should better reflect this (perhaps rasing a more severe looking alert when it's anything other than the OS or bundled Application requesting any sort of privileged access, which explains something along the lines of the previous sentence).
On the subject, it could do with some means of forgery protection (things like an embedded image in the window have been suggested) so that you can better trust it's an authentic authentication dialog. If your paranoid.
Technically Windows allows for roughly this sort of behaviour too (that is, you should never need admin permissions to install a regular application) but the large number of badly written installers - combined with the lack of a K.I.S.S. approach in the OS - seem to have conspired to make admin level access madatory for even the most mundane tasks.
I bet if vendors (and I include both Apple and Microsoft in that) implimented privilage dialogs that were scary and intimidating enough to users (perhaps with a default action of 'deny') 3rd party application developers wouldn't ask for them unless they really needed those permissions.
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Interesting)
I bet if vendors (and I include both Apple and Microsoft in that) implimented privilage dialogs that were scary and intimidating enough to users (perhaps with a default action of 'deny') 3rd party application developers wouldn't ask for them unless they really needed those permissions.
Still, that'll never solve the problem of the user getting used to it. "WARNING: Email attachments may contain viruses! Are you sure you want to download nakedjlo.exe??????" "Duuuh...well it must be OK, my friend sent it t
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Informative)
For an ordinary user, the Mac ALWAYS asks for an admin password in order to make any change to the Applications folder. If the user is dumb enough to be logged in as an admin, then it does not. Making every user only a standard user goes a long way towards preventing a messed up system. A regular user can still install some, but not all programs in their own user space. However such installs will
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Informative)
This somewhat misses the point that if your dragging an Application into the "Applications" folder and your asked for a password, it's absolutely clear why the system (note: not the application) is asking you for a password. A kernel driver or global startup item can't somehow magically install itself when your only dragging a folder.
As already pointed out, having admin privilages on your a
Re:Think different... (Score:4, Informative)
I would also like to point out that even when you are dragging and droping apps into the Apps folder it will prompt you once to say "You are about to run (application name) for the first time. Are you sure you want to do this?" which is a pretty good fail safe for programs that are trying to run silently.
Re:Think different... (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah, Mail and Safari patches do the same, I assume it keeps track of the Applications filename / it's location / MD5 of the binary / etc. which is why it requires confirmation the first time you run the new version of the application (so that someone - or some software - can't switch the legitimate application with a trojan copy).
Good Thing(TM), even if the iTunes patches are a little too frequent.
Re:Think different... (Score:2, Insightful)
The full details would have to always be readily available, if behind a "Scary Computer Words" button. If novices have a problem, they should be able to give all the information to a sysadmin or tech support, even if they don't understand it.
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
Think what a hell would become the customer support: everytime something happens the system may respond to the user in 10 different ways.
And if a user logs into another mac (at Internet café, library, university etc..), she well have to know if it's configured for dummies or super-geeks or whatever. I may even add that as she gets used to her mac she will want to try to step to the next level, but the user has to learn again how the system behaves.
And so on.
It has been proposed more than once, but I doubt it will be ever implemented, as it is a usability nightmare.
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Interesting)
Someone was saying that you get so used to typing your admin password on OS X that you just do it as a reflex - that hasn't been my experience. This simple change represents a great improvement over Windows XP.
In the case of the Sony DRM I think it quite likely that Mac OS X users will find the request for their admin password "odd" - and hopefully a significant number would refuse to give it.
Of course some will as we all tend to trust "big names", maybe that's the real lesson here - Sony can be as evil/stupid as anyone else. And if you can't trust Sony, who can you trust?
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Insightful)
Jezza, this is not intended to be a personal slam on you. It's more of a general comment.
This is very true - very little Windows software can cope like this, now Windows Vista (aka Longhorn) will work like this by default, so I expect LOTS of software to fail for this reason alone. Hopefully once everything get updated for Vista we can run our XP boxes in this mode too (which will be much better.
Hope seems to spring eternal in the MS windows world. I've been hearing people say essentially the same th
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Insightful)
And the reason why it's not going to happen is games. Any game that is available today will simply not run in user mode, be it XP or Vista, simply because their copy-protection schemes require access to some files and registers that a regular user should never have access to. When people
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Informative)
You are not often challenged for your password in Mac OS X. The default installation location is
If something's asking you for your password and isn't (a) your security manager wanting to fetch your keychain for a website, or (b) something that should be installing drivers, be very worried and don't type your password until you understand exactly what it's doing. My mother has to type her password so infrequently on Mac OS X that she can never remember what it is.
Even Microsoft Office is a drag-and-drop-to-install application (as well as being a drag), ferchrisakes.
(and mods, please mod parent down for using Andrew Tanenbaum's [wikipedia.org] name).
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Informative)
In 10.3, the group for /Applications is admin, so only user accounts that are set to be Administrators can install or remove applications. Maybe they changed this in Tiger. All of the applications I looked at are also modifiable by group admin. That's why I tell people that they should set up an administrator account, and disable it for themselves. The obvious user name, admin, is blocked by Apple's account administration routines, though (you can create it as your initial user in 10.3, but they stopped
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Insightful)
All of the applications in /Applications are writable by group admin. That's a huge security problem.
/Library and a lot of stuff underneath it is writable by group admin. That's Internet plug-ins, printers, trusted certificates, help files, scripts, some frameworks, stuff in Application Support - a lot of stuff points things at executables, or has scripting capabilities, or is otherwise assumed to be trusted.
Much of the stuff in /Developer is writable by admin. That means something could do a sneak att
Re:Think different... (Score:5, Insightful)
Are you feeling OK today? Would you like someone else to help you to moderate?
(Not me, of course, as by posting I prevent myself from moderating...)
Re:Think different... (Score:4, Interesting)
That's why most users around here don't KNOW the admin password. When we set up brand new Macs for others, we always make at least two accounts. One for administration and the others for everyday normal users. Users who must be given the admin password are admonished NEVER to give that password unless they are expecting to be asked for it when installing or upgrading software. So far, none of them has been hit with any shady programming because of this. Unlike our Windows users, the Mac users can do everything they need to without even knowing the admin password.
This should work in most homes, where the parents are the only one who know the master password. That way the kids can't so easily mess up the whole computer. ALL games even work just fine without the master password, once they are properly set up.
KIDS can't mess it up? (Score:3, Insightful)
I realize that since you are in IT, you probably do some kind of drugs, but this statement seems over the top. Maybe you accidentally reversed it, because on the last informal survey I've done, it's often kids who need to keep their parents away from trying
Re:Think different... (Score:3, Funny)
After a short while, typing in your password becomes as much of an unconscious acticity as pressing "OK" on a dialog box. I think we need blinking lights, horns, mandatory timers, and permission from your sysadmin before you can do anything stupid.
This is why I still use su instead of sudo. There's just something about typing in the root password and handing over the keys to my box that makes my sphincter pucker.
Why yes, I give my admin password out on request! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why yes, I give my admin password out on reques (Score:5, Insightful)
You would be amazed at what most users will do for music, porn, wallpapers, or screensavers.
Mac OS isn't immune to this kind of crapola - at least not for the average user.
Re:Why yes, I give my admin password out on reques (Score:5, Funny)
A client of mine once got an email instructing telling her that a virus had been installed on her system. She was to immediately locate a file (I think it was COMMAND.COM) and delete it, which would remove the hazard.
She forwarded it on to me (just in case I needed it, you see) and then sent me a second email because the person who sent her the message had trashed their system, and she thought I was about to do same.
When it comes to stupidity among users, I will believe anything
Admin Privileges (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Admin Privileges (Score:5, Insightful)
Joe user: What's this I see? I have to enter my password to play a music CD? Oh no biggy, its just a music CD. What harm could it do?
That is my concern. The average user sees it comes from Sony, a "trustable" company, and doesn't give it a second thought. A very lethal comboWell one clear warning sign... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well one clear warning sign... (Score:2)
Re:Well one clear warning sign... (Score:3, Insightful)
Make a fortune (Score:2, Interesting)
Customers buy DRM CDs and hand them over to you. You give them back a copy of the CD with the DRM removed, for the cost of the blank CD and a small service fee. Hold onto the original CD with customer records as evidence that the customer bought the CD and has the right to copy for personal use.
Not workable?
Re:Make a fortune (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Make a fortune (Score:2)
Microsoft does it better.... (Score:4, Interesting)
A mate installs a Windows XP OEM version onto a PC. Activates it and everything is sweet. A few days later his pc is stolen. So he buys a new PC, because he still has the Windows XP CD, the manual, the license and all the little stickers, he goes to install it on the new PC. It wont activate. He rings Microsoft. They refuse to activate the software since its been activated on another pc, and that violates the OEM license. They suggest he reports it to his insurance company as stolen and they can pay for a new license.
So they encourage him to commit insurance fraud as the software has not been stolen, because he has all the software and the licenses to run it.
Re:Make a fortune (Score:2)
daft... (Score:4, Insightful)
Surely, they realise that its only going to create a backlash against DRM if they continue this nonsense?
Re:daft... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:daft... (Score:3, Interesting)
I see this beginning to be the backlash of DRM for the average "Joe Desktop". Especially when the media is throwing in the scary worded "root kit" voodoo around.
With luck (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:With luck (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:With luck (Score:3, Funny)
Re:daft... (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, they are still using Memory Stick in cameras, laptops, etc. even though it's clear that SD Card has won that battle. Sony is weird like that. The seem to have an attitude that since they are such a big electronics manufacturer that they can single-handedly define industry standards.
(But if that were true, we'd be talking about copy-protection on Minidisc, not CD...)
bondage (Score:4, Funny)
Re:bondage (Score:5, Funny)
Jesus (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, I for one pledge to no longer purchase any sony products. Nor will I buy online music from sony, purchase any games, or watch any sony movies until they stop being overbearing assholes with their stuff.
Illustrates why... (Score:5, Insightful)
Who knows how evil the DRM is, once the install is made, but jeebus... talk about an issue of trust (just for the installer)!
Episode 3 (Score:2)
Is there any DRM on the Star wars : episode 3 DVD? I know the movie files are encoded but i mean rootkit type DRM bullshit.
Thanks.
Re:Episode 3 (Score:2)
Re:Episode 3 (Score:3, Funny)
Even more thankfully (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:3, Informative)
what if the moviefile is flawed? (Score:4, Insightful)
What if that movie file is flawed?
The Windows OS only opens a autorun file too; which is linked to a executable; but the principles are just the same, only the practical side is much more exploitable in Windows with its flawed autorun system...
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:2)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:2)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Even more thankfully (Score:3, Funny)
And see, that is exactly what bugs me about OS X, and why Windows is easier to use. On OS X, I stick a CD in, and it shows up on my desktop but doesn't autorun. iTunes pops up, and allows me to rip the CD by clicking on a button.
This is completely backwards to me. I like it when Windows autoruns the CD, starting up the elegant "Let's display hidden windows" WMP and having me search around for my CD. (Autorun also allows the CD to install programs in the background,
At least this means one good thing... (Score:5, Interesting)
That's the last Sony CD I ever buy (Score:3, Interesting)
In the past I've made a point of buying stuff I liked, either on CD or from an online retailer (iTunes).
Well, Sony just lost my business. And fuck them if they think I am going to subsidize this bullshit.
Goodbye Sony. Hello allofmp3.com.
If you walk the corridors of Sony Music right now all you can hear is the sound of a toilet flushing.
Re:That's the last Sony CD I ever buy (Score:2)
Either way the Music execs get nothing (nor the artists ) and it is fairly unofficial.
I don't think I will ever buy another Sony CD again
Re:That's the last Sony CD I ever buy (Score:3, Insightful)
Ah, yes... Giving credit card numbers to (essentially) unknown foreign agencies that claim to be completely legal. I'm curious if there's a middle ground in there. Perhaps VISA gift cards? Set spending limit, so if they steal your number, they only get your $25 music money? Would that work?
Now that this sort of thing is coming to the Mac, I'll start to think about it more seriously... Given the lax attitude some of us Mac fanatics take to antivirus, one rootkit and one
Re:That's the last Sony CD I ever buy (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:That's the last Sony CD I ever buy (Score:3, Informative)
Looking forward (Score:2, Funny)
Throwing out the baby with the bath water (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Throwing out the baby with the bath water (Score:3, Interesting)
OK, here are the options you have.
Sony CD: Contains very poorly written DRM that may forever screw up your machine.
P2P: Spend days sifting through partial, corrupted and poorly named files to get the CD you want, risking viruses, lawsuits and your entire Saturday afternoon.
Online music stores (iTMS, allofmp3): Cheaper than a CD, quicker and s
autorun (Score:4, Informative)
EULA (Score:3, Informative)
Its not a substitute for truelly reading the whole EULA, however I find it good at helping me and my customers identify 'dodgy' software.
McCarthyism doesn't sound so bad now... (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course, criminals will always hire criminals; a thief will always have a chance at getting hired by the Mafia, so I don't expect this will completely work. Computer companies that have overgrown beyond their event horizon of personal responsibility such as Sony and Microsoft will always be a haven for crooks and guttersnipes. But every responsible company still around should outright refuse to hire anyone who's ever knowingly developed anything related to DRM; conduct background checks on every potential employee's employment history and slam the door in the face of any DRM sympathizer looking for a job.
I wouldn't call that McCarthyism.. (Score:3, Insightful)
I've never been so hungry that I would write code like that. If the ethical situation of a job makes you uncomfortable, leave it. That actually plays pretty well while interviewing for your next job. At least for any job you actually want.
Speaking as someone who has actually done quite a bit of engineering hiring, I can say that I do filter people by where they have chosen to work before. I learned that lesson by bitter experience. People joke about "resume stains", but l
Linux port? (Score:5, Funny)
I was wondering... (Score:2)
Sony just lost ~5000 euros (Score:5, Interesting)
And this was definitely the last time I even consider Sony. Forget the new Playstation, if I have to choose from the two bad options M$ vs. Sony my money goes to M$ in this case.
As big a fan as I am of the Van Zant brothers, I just can't think of buying the album after all this. Luckily it was available without DRM somewhere else. It's a shame for the artists though, they didn't get thei $0.50 or whatever they make per sold CD.
I know my 5000 doesn't bankrupt Sony but if more of us start voting with our wallets maybe they will realize they can't keep on shafting customers every chance they get.
At first, it seemed like a bad idea... (Score:5, Interesting)
It may sound paranoid, but once they start messing with the kernel, you really don't know what they're going to do...
I love how they lie (Score:3, Interesting)
"November 8, 2005 - This Service Pack removes the cloaking technology component that has been recently discussed in a number of articles published regarding the XCP Technology used on SONY BMG content protected CDs. This component is not malicious and does not compromise security. However to alleviate any concerns that users may have about the program posing potential security vulnerabilities, this update has been released to enable users to remove this component from their computers. Please note, Service Pack 2a is a maintenance release designed to reduce the file size of Service Pack 2. It includes all previous fixes found in Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2."
http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/updates.html [sonybmg.com]HMM it does not compromise security? It installs a root kit, then it lets people hide a trojan on your computer. Who needs sony anyway, I have my game cube and X-box.
Sony Music CD's Contain Mac DRM Software... (Score:3, Funny)
As result of this Sony rootkit fiasco... (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Sony music CD's
2. Sony HD TV
3. Sony Playstation 3 and games
4. Sony Bluray DVD player
5. Sony Ericson phones
6. Sony VAIO laptop
7. Sony DVD burner
8. Sony digital camera
9. Sony video recorder
The only way Sony will regain my trust is if they were to:
1. publically admit that what they did was wrong
2. put a link on sony.com to a page explaining what exactly happened and provide software to uninstall the rootkit
3. recall all CD's on the shelf containing rootkit DRM
4. offer replacement CD's to all customers
Affected Titles (Score:4, Funny)
Celine Dion, On ne Change Pas (Epic)
Neil Diamond, 12 Songs (Columbia)
Our Lady Peace, Healthy in Paranoid Times (Columbia)
Chris Botti, To Love Again (Columbia)
Van Zant, Get Right with the Man (Columbia)
Switchfoot, Nothing is Sound (Columbia)
The Coral, The Invisible Invasion (Columbia)
Acceptance, Phantoms (Columbia)
Susie Suh, Susie Suh (Epic)
Amerie, Touch (Columbia)
Life of Agony, Broken Valley (Epic)
Horace Silver Quintet, Silver's Blue (Epic Legacy)
Gerry Mulligan, Jeru (Columbia Legacy)
Dexter Gordon, Manhattan Symphonie (Columbia Legacy)
The Bad Plus, Suspicious Activity (Columbia)
The Dead 60s, The Dead 60s (Epic)
Dion, The Essential Dion (Columbia Legacy)
Natasha Bedingfield, Unwritten (Epic)
Ricky Martin, Life (Columbia)
from the eff [eff.org]
Perhaps this DRM is your punishment for listening to Ricky Martin and Celine Dion?
Simplify EULAs (Score:4, Interesting)
That is how these Spyware companies gain "permission" and certainly how Sony has gained "permission" to install anything they want. Most users aren't able to read a 5 page legal document squeezed into a tiny little box very effectively.
We need to write our Congressmen and Senators and tell them that EULAs should be simplified, even standardized. I'd even suggest that some sort of color coding be required to indicate the severity of changes to be made. Unlike Homeland Security's approach, I suggest three simple colors: GREEN, YELLOW, RED (You might recognize these colors from your local STOPLIGHT).
GREEN - This EULA just contains standard legal protections of the company for their software.
YELLOW - This application will install some components to run at the same permission level as the user.
RED - This application will install SYSTEM-LEVEL COMPONENTS.
This may not be perfect, but the 10-pages of legal mumbo-jumbo is hard for even the paranoid to go through. For example, I installed several updates to my Mac OS X system (10.4.3, Java, Quicktime, iTunes, Airport) and EACH ONE contained an EULA that was extremely long.
The current system is broken and, unfortunately, we need to change the law to fix it because I know that the large companies with their lawyers have no intention of fixing it.
Mac OS X's malware resiliency put to the test (Score:4, Interesting)
And even after that, it's not the gigantic pain in the ass to remove that the Windows stuff is. Removal is a simple matter of unloading the kernel extensions and deleting them with administrator privileges. For some reason, Windows seems to facilitate the development of software that installs silently and is utterly impossible to remove.
This is why it's not just the popularity factor that keeps OS X malware-free. It's a solid design based around the idea of minimal automation and least privileges needed. Even if OS X was twice as popular, any malware would still have the same hurdles to jump through.
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:5, Interesting)
Ha ha, only serious. Seriously, this isn't an "any computer" issue. This is an issue with the only "modern" OS that have been specifically engineered to run arbitrary binaries with privileges without challenging the user. It's isn't a matter of Mac OS X or Linux (or VMS or Solaris or SunOS or VM/CMS) being better, it's a matter of Windows being worse .
This isn't even a matter of Windows' original design, as Dave Cutler's original security model was solid and included a good separation of privileges away from the desktop user, drawing on the last half a century of computing experience. This is a matter of Microsoft Management specifically and intentionally deciding to screw you. They will say it was necessary to make a desktop OS usable by novices - Mac OS X does give the lie to such horseshit (and that is the only place Mac OS X specifically figures in this topic).
Yes, Sony deserves a lot of the blame. But Microsoft deserves just as much. You can start to "fight this stupidity" by not using Windows.
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:3, Insightful)
See, that's the thing. It's easy to say those three words, "Don't use Windows." But it's just not that simple. Hell, it's not even practical. Perhaps it's a bad analogy but it would be like saying to people who are complaining about gas prices, "Don't drive cars that run on gas." It's not as simple as just flicking a fucking switch and bam, you're home free. A lot of people know a thing or two about internal combustion engines and like to tinke
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:4, Informative)
I spend most of my time on a Mac (at work) but have a PC at home. If I had the money for a new computer I'd buy a Mac, but everytime I think of ditching my PC altogether I have to stop and think...
well, I won't be able to play most of the games I bought anymore...and there's an application or two that's Windows only that I need occasionally...
It pisses me off because I don't want to use Windows. I guess I could live without the old games, but there have been many times where I think, well, at least I can just open that in windows and re-save it.
The best situation I can see is that OS X and/or Linux gets enough market share so that it's common for certain businesses/people to have a PC for occasional compatibility purposes only, which will lead to Mac/Linux converters that will eliminate the need for a PC, so that 100% Mac/Linux shops will have to be a consideration at least.
If I may go on a tangent here...
I used to work at a pre-press company (my title was "Mac Operator" which I always thought would be a cool 80's rap name. I'd change it to "Mac O" in the 90's [a la P. Diddy], then to "MOpe" around 2003). Anyway, we had one WinNT machine we kept around for the clients who were too low-scale to realize that all print work was done on Macs.
Any Windows job was a guaranteed pain-in-the-ass, mostly for compatibility reasons, but also because WinNT was stupid about networking and printing issues. It always seemed stupid to me that, while we printed to million dollar imagesetters and had clients like the Dell computer catalog, we had to keep this red-deaded stepchiled to run a Windows version of Quark (or for the real low-rent clients who submitted Windows Pagemaker files).
I'm a video editor now, and I still get annoyed when someone wants a non-Quicktime movie file. Some of the blame surely lies with Apple who won't even let you import an MP3 into Final Cut Pro unless you convert it into a Quicktime file first, but for the most part Apple tries to be universal, whereas Microsoft's attitude is "Fuck everyone else. If you're not using .avis and Word .docs you can go screw yourself."
Thank god that blu-ray won out so we don't have do deal with even more forced-incompatibility issues. I just want shit to work. I'm not totally computer-illiterate (I know enough to install a new OS, or random expansion card, or hard drive. I've used Linux a bit on my personal computer), but when there's work to be done I don't want to have to use Google to search for the best way to convert a file or get a random piece of PC hardware to work on a Mac.
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:5, Informative)
In Windows, you just insert the CD. Maybe into someone else's system when their back is turned. Windows OS trusts external content much more than the user sitting at the desk. "Do me", it says.
Unfortunately, people are still stupid enough to follow these ludicrous steps. Remember the teddy bear "virus" in Windows? Consisted only of an email, the instructions to delete a standard Windows exe file, and a directive to resend the email to all of your friends.
PS. Join us... you know you want to.
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Oh thank God... (Score:4, Insightful)
See, it's that sort of naivete that I'm talking about. If Sony put all their information through their Supercalculamotron 4000(TM) and somehow came to the conclusion that it would be in their own interests to invest millions upon millions on fundamentally flawed DRM methods using dubious moral standards, what makes you think that they won't suddenly wake up one morning and think, "Holy shit! Linux users are getting a free lunch! Let's fuck them over somehow! Get First4Internet on the phone, I'm sure they'll be able to come up with something!" If that happened, then the very best you could expect would be a putrid aborted foetus of a DRM clusterfuck. Heaven forbid that a company like First4Internet actually do the job right. Knowing their competency, they'd just manage to send your mp3s to
Obviously *nix is a much more difficult problem for them to deal with... but you're just asking for it by sitting around lazily thinking it could never happen to you.
Re:List of Sony/BMG sub labels (Score:3, Informative)
Granted, this will also include any mixed mode CDs with bonus video content, but whats to stop that data layer from trying to install DRM?
Re:List of Sony/BMG sub labels (Score:3, Informative)
The myth that no