Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Mac mini Dissection

Posted by timothy on Wed Jan 19, 2005 01:17 AM
from the vicarious-fun dept.
xbasque writes "Smash has a video showing the technique for cracking open a Mac mini safely. Upgrade the RAM and hard drive yourself and save a bundle (ain't that the point of the mini?)" And if you don't plan to take one apart yourself, parvenu74 points out the pictures of exploratory Mac mini surgery on mini-itx.com, writing "From a post: 'The board itself is slightly smaller than Mini-ITX at about 160mm square by our estimations, and includes Ethernet, Modem, DVI/VGA, 2 x USB, Firewire and Audio connectors (sadly not optical).'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Tarcastil (832141) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:20AM (#11405426)
    Let's hope it's not hosted on a dissected mac mini. Unless it's overclocked. Then it's OK.
  • by rebeka thomas (673264) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:20AM (#11405428)
    This was not ripped open. This mac mini was just one motherboard provided to the press for the purpose of looking at its motherboard. MacNews.de aren't the only site with images of that particular motherboard.
  • Can't Wait (Score:5, Funny)

    by TheKidWho (705796) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:20AM (#11405429)
    To put one of these babies in my car.

    Then put some wicked cool Red LED Lights in the front of the car, and whenever the car talks to me, the red lights act like a visualizer of sorts. Knight Rider here I come!
          • Re:Can't Wait (Score:5, Interesting)

            by Ohreally_factor (593551) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:32AM (#11405776) Journal
            Uh, no, what you want to do is use OS X's Spoken User Interface for hands free operation. The touch screen idea isn't bad, and maybe the best overall solution is some combination of the two.

            Also, with the appropriate hacks (perhaps Salling Clicker [mac.com]), you could integrate your bluetooth phone into the mix. Open Address Book, search for a name and have the computer dial out over the phone with voice commands. Incoming calls could also automatically mute the volume on iTunes.

            I dunno, that's just off the top of my head. You could also use your bluetooth phone to connect to the internet to look up directions on mapquest, but it'd probably be better to pull over for that.

            One question. If the mini Mac goes into the car stereo space, does the printer go into the glove compartment or do you just mount it on top of the dash? =)
  • That is cool (Score:4, Interesting)

    by leicaM6 (730225) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:21AM (#11405431)
    It would make a good brain for a robot
  • Audio in? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by QuantumG (50515) <qg@biodome.org> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:23AM (#11405443) Homepage Journal
    Is there an actual audio in on the board? Cause there's no socket for it. Apparently this is because there are superior USB devices that work with GarageBand so no-one would use an audio in jack if there was one. What I wanna know is what's the best way to use this as a PVR? Are there USB tv tuners? How about USB high definition receivers?
  • by Gob Blesh It (847837) <gobblesh1t@gmail.com> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:27AM (#11405462)
    It's mentioned in the article, but it probably bears repeating here: "Apple states that as long as you do not BREAK your Mac Mini while working on the inside, it is still covered under warranty."

    Left unanswered is the obvious question: well then, if any hardware problems arise, how will Apple know I'm not to blame? Based on my experience getting Macs serviced (4 years in university), I'd say there's really not much to worry about. If you break the RAM slot, then tough luck. But if, say, the CPU dies through no fault of yours, Apple's not the sort of company to refuse to service your Mac on a technicality. There aren't a lot of assholes working for Apple customer service.

    Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.
    • by dr.badass (25287) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:44AM (#11405541) Homepage
      Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      In my experience with PC repair, you can usually tell by how thoroughly the person who brought it in denies having opened the case, which is always in proportion to how broken it is.
    • by fmaxwell (249001) * on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:46AM (#11405547) Homepage Journal
      It's mentioned in the article, but it probably bears repeating here: "Apple states that as long as you do not BREAK your Mac Mini while working on the inside, it is still covered under warranty."

      Translation: Apple has agreed to abide by the law and by FTC regulations. This is the same as your car dealer saying that your car warranty will remain in effect even if you elect to change your own oil filter, oil, air filter, etc.

      Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      While companies put the "warranty void if this sticker is broken," such stickers would be easy to successfully challenge in court. There are some obvious exceptions, like hard drives where it is unlikely that the owner will have access to a clean room, but this is far different. Consumers have been successfully assembling, upgrading, and repairing personal computers for years. That's not to say that Apple is obliged to give warranty service if you, for example, put a higher wattage CPU in the machine and it causes a thermally-induced failure.

      All of this falls under the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. Just as the act guarantees your right to install a Fram air filter in your car without warranty repercussions, it allows you to install Crucial RAM in your Apple computer without Apple being able to deny all subsequent warranty claims.

      Just my $.02.
    • by earthpig (227603) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:10AM (#11405670) Homepage
      No, There is just one asshole and he works in Europe Support. it seems that apple service state side and here in europe are two different beasts.
      i bought my power book in the US but live right now in europe. I sent it in for the know problem of white spots on the display. There was some shipping damage and ES (euro support) refused to take any responsibility for it and refused fix anything stating - paraphrasing - give us $900 or we won't fix it, because the damage was not listed in the original service request. but when i got back to the states, thety fixed it no questions asked.

      I was talking to customer service in Ireland complaining about the level of service i was receiving. I had the guy on the phone tell me that he had head the words extortion and blackmail used a lot by people refering to the kind of support from ES.

      Form you own conclusion!
      • by Gid1 (23642) <(gid) (at) (litebase.com)> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @06:26AM (#11406557)
        In my experience, Apple UK is pretty bad too. I've had hardware problems with every mac I've had recently (my bad luck, I think), and every time it's been a real chore getting Apple to fix it, even with AppleCare. Each time, I've ended up having to call up someone in Customer Relations in the US and have them intervene.

        The last time, my iBook screen went dead while it was just sitting on my desk. I was turned away from the Apple Centre in Kensington on the grounds that I'd bought the iBook at a different store (an Apple-authorised reseller). Apple's telephone support refused to even discuss the fault unless I paid an incident fee, which they assured me would be refunded if it turned out to be a warranty issue (which it did). That is NOT the way warranties are meant to work. My AppleCare-covered PM G4 workstation had a broken SuperDrive which destroyed the hardware test CD with a buzzsaw sound when Apple told me to try it. They wanted me to send them the machine for three weeks, just to replace a £30 part I could have fitted myself in less than a minute.

        Apple US support is great. Apple UK support isn't. I'm hoping the presence of the London retail store might make things easier, at least for us London residents.

        If I didn't rely so much on OS X and its pure superiority to everything else (IMHO), I'd never buy Apple hardware again.
  • Smash??! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Chordonblue (585047) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:37AM (#11405508) Homepage Journal
    Can I guess Smash's method of opening the case or should I RTFA?

  • by Mercano (826132) <mercanoNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:41AM (#11405525)
    Is the slot for the WiFi\Bluetooth card any sort of standard connector? Apple carges $75 for 802.11* ($125 for 802 and Bluetooth), which seems sorta pricy, unless, of course, you need to get an Apple specifc part, at which point it is just a ripoff.

    Yeah, you probably could just hook up a USB 802 adapter, but then you loose some "look how small it is" points.
    • by diamondsw (685967) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:30AM (#11405772)
      The Bluetooth module I'm unsure of, but the Airport Extreme is a mini-PCI slot, so it is a standard, although a rarely seen one. Apple sells Airport Extreme cards in their store, but I doubt you'll find a third-party one; certainly not one that will work with Apple's drivers.

      This is one of those areas where it makes sense to just go ahead and buy it up front, deal with the financial squeeze for a short while, and reap the benefits for however many years you have it.
      • by cosmo7 (325616) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @03:02AM (#11405912) Homepage
        Maybe. I just put a Belkin 802.11g PCI card in my power mac (the half-ton shaving mirror one) and it works fine as an Airport card, no drivers to install or anything.

        Mind you, Belkin's rebate system is a total fraud. Absolute total broad daylight fraud. Go ahead you assholes, sue me. I dare you. Sue me right now. Fraudsters.
  • by EnronHaliburton2004 (815366) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:49AM (#11405564) Homepage Journal
    [evil]

    Dissecting a MiniMac is sort of like ripping the limbs off of your kid sister's Barbie dolls and glueing them back onto your GI Joe action figures ... I can imagine the expressions on their face when they see the all the pieces laying there on the table ...

    [/evil]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:49AM (#11405566)
    From the FA:
    the rounded corners should help cramming it into unusual places
    I know I'm going to regret asking, but just what are the usual "unusual places"?
  • by Joff_NZ (309034) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:58AM (#11405601) Homepage Journal
    $399 Dell PC: "No Wireless"
    $499 Minimac: "AirPort Extreme- and Bluetooth-ready"


    So.... that'd be the "no wireless" option for the minimac too?
    • by Leo McGarry (843676) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:21AM (#11405724)
      Wireless gizmos come in two parts: the antenna and the guts. The antennas are already built into all Mac hardware. All you need to add is the guts.

      With the Dell, on the other hand, you get neither antennas nor guts. That means that, if you add wireless via a card or some damn thing, it's either going to perform really poorly or it's going to have a big-ass antenna sticking out of it.

      Advantage: Apple.
  • by dcstimm (556797) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:09AM (#11405664) Homepage
    I had this video for awhile because I am training to be a Apple Portable / Desktop Tech, If you purchuse the $299 Apple Service Training you get this and any other Take apart video for free. THe person that leaked this could be in some serious trouble..
  • by The OPTiCIAN (8190) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:56AM (#11405889) Homepage
    At http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/editors/2005/01/mi niapplesandoranges/index.php I read this:

    """
    But it was only a matter of time before someone would argue, "It's still not price-competitive with the cheapest Dell." And within days we've got our first such columns and articles, all of which leave me scratching my head, wondering if these guys are as bad at comparing products when they shop for themselves as they apparently are when comparing products for their columns.
    """

    I agree. I'm a really recent switcher. I had a second hand mac kicking around years ago (and despised the OS - I ran Be on it), but bought an iBook laptop last Friday. It's my first mac and my first laptop. My justification was that it was cheap, runs unix, has full driver support, especially for wireless networking. I've held off for about two years waiting for a laptop that can deliver that for less than two grand Australian. That's a really compelling formula, and a far better geek computer than a PC.

    To get a happy unix experience on a PC laptop you either pay a lot more money or roll the dice on linux drivers and winmodems. Or you can try and run Windows and put up with the limitations of cygwin or the speed hit of vmware. Yuck.

    Not that it's always been this way. Until recently, Apples sucked. But OS X has become usable and the hardware has a better reputation than it used to - laptops in particular.

    If I were Apple I'd be a bit concerned at the powerbook line - the iBooks deliver so much for so little now the powerbooks don't look very attractive.
      • by cheekyboy (598084) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @04:16AM (#11406167) Homepage Journal
        If today you can edit on a uber $2000 mac, and its 'professional quality' then if in 18months time, the same spec mac comes out for $500, will you stupidly claim that its "cheap junk, good for web/email only" ????

        You want fast DV editing? plug a FIREWIRE 400gig drive into it, then you cannot claim its a hookey pooky cheapass mac.

        Todays $300 PC was $1000 in the year 2000, ie with the same specs if it was available. I could edit fine in the year 2000, though not as fast as a $5000 RAID scsi PC of today, its not as bad as a 1995 AVID system.

  • by paanta (640245) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @10:33AM (#11408366) Homepage
    I have a nice year-and-a-half old PC sitting in my living room, as well as a G4 ibook with a processor running at basically half the speed of my PC. The PC never gets turned on. Rather, it gets turned on by my wife when she can't rip the ibook from my hands, or by me when I need to run ArcGIS or AutoCAD. I'll probably always _need_ a PC around, but I certainly don't _want_ one around. Yes, its clearly a superior machine in raw computing power, but its not really designed to be lived with. Frankly, if I'm going to spend 8 hours a day sitting in front of a computer, I want it to be pleasant to look at and nice to touch and totally silent. I don't want the ugliest thing in my house to be the thing I spend the most time using.

    Would I tolerate a refridgerator that was cold enough to make liquid nitrogen if it also kicked out a 90dB whine? No. Would I ever use a toaster that was 5x larger than it needed to be and so ugly that I had to hide it under a desk? No. Do I want my toilet to blue-screen-of-death on me? Not particularly.

  • by djplurvert (737910) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @10:47AM (#11408517)
    It's VERY important that those of you who need PCI slots and super fast processors DO NOT BUY a mac mini.

    You are ABSOLUTELY right. The DELLs come WITH PCI slots, a SUPER FAST intel processor, and BEST OF ALL.....WINDOWS!!!

    If you start MESING WITH WINTEL SUCCESS by thinking of trying a mac now you will only DELAY the arrival of MY mac-mini which I will be ordering soon.

    It is OBVIOUS that any computer that doesn't sound like a 707 when you turn it on is NO COMPUTER at all.

    There is CLEARLY NO VALUE in reducing the size and audible noise of a PC. In fact, if anything, telling the world you have a little cabinet is BAD BAD BAD!!!

    The mac-mini is NOT for you. Please continue to purchase DELLs and whatnot so you have something to show off to your friends while you drone on about expandability, oh, and stop picking your nose.
    • by tetromino (807969) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:32AM (#11405485)
      I'll just spring for the extra 500 bucks and have apple do it for me.....or just buy two whole stinkin' computers for the same price. Hmm....

      You can build two stinking x86 computers - or one very decent x86 computer, which would be my choice - for $500. If you know how to put parts together, you can easily make something that outperforms the mini. The problem is that 95% of the people out there don't build, but buy their machines from Dell, HP, etc. and $500 Dells suck badly. They come with Celerons and Intel Integrated graphics, they don't have Firewire or CD burners, and so the Mac mini looks reasonably competitive - especially if you value the aesthetics.
      • by TheKidWho (705796) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @01:39AM (#11405518)
        or if you like OS X.

        or if you want a silent computer that doesnt overheat.

        for a good cheap comp though, nforce3 + athlon + ram + HD + cd/dvd + case probablly might end up coming out to around $500. But the computer definetly wont be the size of the mac mini, or as quiet.
          • by MoneyT (548795) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:05AM (#11405646) Journal
            Untill you get to thinking about the slots and what you need them for. Example, my PC sitting here has 5 PCI slots and 1 AGP slot.

            The AGP slot is occupied by a video card, which I just recently replaced for the first time in 5 years. On the mac mini, that's already built onto the board with an ATI chipset.

            1 PCI slot is used by my Soudblaster card, which I just recently upgraded, again for the first time in 5 years, and that was because the card never worked right in the first place and this happened to be the time I was upgrading things. On the mac mini, this is built into the system

            1 PCI slot is occupied by an ethernet card, un upgraded in 5 years. Gigabit is built into the mac mini

            1 slot contains a USB/Firewire card, again, un upgraded, and built into the mac mini.

            The other two slots remain unused, and for the forseeable future, I have no use for them. In the end, they're actualy a waste.

            So when I look at the mac mini, it has everything I would use PCI/AGP slots for built in.

            So then the question becomes well what if you want to upgrade?

            Well, when I did my mass upgrade for the first time in 5 years (until now, I had only added RAM), I bought a new motherboard, a new processor, new graphics card, new soundcard and new RAM. My total cost came out to about $600 after rebates.

            After reflecting on this, it occurs to me, that if a mac mini suits my needs, by the time I would decide to upgrade it, I might as well just buy a new one for $500.

            In fact, for the first time, my computer would actualy be a disposable product. Something that I could (theoreticaly) just discard and buy a new one when it no longer served my needs, and it would be roughly price equivilant to upgrading the system.

            So in the end, having PCI slots and an accessable case on the mac mini would seem to be more of a waste than a benefit.

            Of course, you can always argue that hard core gamers and power users have other things and upgrade more frequently, but I argue that no hardcore gamer/power user is buying a $500 computer.
            • by smcdow (114828) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @08:15AM (#11406985) Homepage
              You're not getting it.

              I'm no Mac fanboy; I've got plenty of x86 machines running Linux and XP (it does have its uses) all over the place at work and at home. But, the very next machine on my list to buy is the Mac Mini. Seems to me that the whole point of the Mac Mini (and indeed of all Macs in general) is this:

              1. You bring it home.
              2. You turn it on.
              3. It just fucking works.

              Constrast with the proceedure for x86 machines:

              1. You bring it home.
              2. You install all your expansion cards.
              3. You install the operating system. We all do that ourselves, right?
              4. You configure the operating system for the devices you have installed
              5. You shut down and rearrange the expansion devices and pray that it clears up interrupt conflicts.
              6. Probably go to step 4. Eventually fall out of this loop.
              7. Tweek. Repeat.
              8. Futz. Repeat.

              I've wasted many, many hours of my precious life installing, configuring, tweeking, twiddling, rearranging, futzing, prodding, farting around with, etc., all these x86 machines. I want at least one computer that I don't have to dick with. Here's my checklist for justifying my buying one:

              1. Runs Quicken? Check.
              2. Runs TurboTax? Check.
              3. Mozilla products? Check.
              4. Runs MS Office (sorry, gotta use it)? Check.
              5. Runs Photoshop? Check.
              6. Runs iTunes? Check.
              7. Unix-based? Check. X11? Check. ('tho I'm no big fan of BSD-ish installations, I'll get used to it).
              8. Upgradable? Who gives a shit?

              What this means for me is that I can dump two machines that I have at home (one Linux, one XP), and replace it with a smaller, no-muss-no-fuss, machine.

              Geeze, how can I resist?

              • by 10Ghz (453478) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @03:45AM (#11406077)
                No, the Mac Mini does NOT have gigabit built-in, it has 100baseT, which is going to start feeling like a 14.4 modem in just a couple years.


                So, you claim that we will basically require Gigabit Ethernet in just few yeas? Funny, this workstation I'm currently on is hooked to a 10MB hub, and I can use it just fine. Yes, that includes accessing files on the server. Are you one of those who think that "Gigabit Ehternet makes my internet faster"?

                100BaseT is more than enough for intended uses of the Mini. You can find gigabit in higher-end models and on servers. Mini has no real need for it.

                Probably Firewire400 and USB1.1 right?


                Seriously: have you even looked at the specs [apple.com] of the Mini? it says in plain English: "One FireWire 400 port; two USB 2.0 ports"!. Yes, the Firewire is only 400. But how many PC's have 800? How many low-end PC's have Firewire at all? How many devices/apps require Firewire 800?

                If these mini macs just had even just 2 PCI slots, I'd be willing to buy one.


                If the Mini had those two slots, you would just find some other flaw in it. Seriously, you cannot satisfy everyone.

                The ability to change devices is the difference between a computer anyone can continue using for years, and a computer that becomes useless after 2 years because one minor component fails and there's no way to replace it.


                Instead of upgrading your machine every two years, you can simply buy a new Mini every two years. End-result is more or less the same, as is the expense.
              • by KingArthur10 (679328) <arthur.bogardNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @04:02AM (#11406128)
                I believe that the parent was trying to simply state that for the AVERAGE user, a $500 computer replaced every two years is still more convienent than a computer that they have to upgrade. Yes, power users who want to run on Windows will inevitably say that they can upgrade for cheap b/c they can do it themselves, but the target audience isn't those power users, but rather the person who knows little about computers and would thus have to take it in to get upgraded in a computer shop for an extra $100 plus parts, which will be more than they really need, but they will get scammed into getting it. Considering I still don't have an internet connection that I can download from at 10-baseT, I don't see the need for a HOME computer needing anything more than 100 baseT within the estimated product lifetime. True there are some bad points to the mini, but to the target audience, this computer will be ideal! I work phone tech support for Cox communications, and guess what, we almost NEVER get a call about internet not working on a mac. The only mac calls we get are people setting up their accounts for the first time (which has actualluy been increasing). This computer is targeted to those who don't want ot worry about virii, spy ware, etc (I know they exist for the mac, but on a much smaller scale) and don't want to worry abotu driver conflicts b/c they now have an OS that is designed around/with the hardware.

                just my two cents.
                • by Phroggy (441) * <slashdot3NO@SPAMphroggy.com> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @04:21AM (#11406178) Homepage
                  The mac mini is a "decent" game system.

                  Sorry, you're wrong here - Macs are just not gaming machines, unfortunately. Many games are never ported to the Mac platform (e.g. Halflife), most are ported months or years after the initial x86 release, new games require faster Macs than what us mortals can afford, and old games aren't Mac OS X native so they run (poorly) under emulation.

                  And I say this as a long-time Mac lover, typing this on my iBook G4 which I love dearly, but on which Warcraft 3 is slow, UT runs in Classic (which doesn't seem to support multiple mouse buttons), Quake 3 also runs in Classic because the native port is even worse, and the UT2k4 demo doesn't even render the title screen correctly. Granted, this machine is nearly a year old now; perhaps a Mac mini would fare better with newer games (and the Classic issue should now be moot). Even still, Counterstrike isn't going to happen. I've been using Macs seriously since System 6, but I can't recommend them as a gaming platform until more game developers take the platform seriously, doing side-by-side development and releasing dual-platform hybrid CDs (a few do this already, of course).
              • by Leo McGarry (843676) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:12AM (#11405681)
                Here's a crazy, mixed-up suggestion.

                Howzabout you buy a computer instead of hand-carving your own microchips?

                People love to talk about how you can build a top-flight desktop computer for $3.25 plus two subway tokens and some kind of weird-ass coin that you dug out of your sofa that's got "Røølï" written on it, but what they curiously omit is the fact that if you took all the time you'd spend gathering parts and assembling them and worked a minimum-wage job at some fast food place instead, you'd earn hundreds of dollars. So the real cost of this "It's Shake-n-Bake, and I helped!" special is, in fact, several times higher than the sum of the price tags on the hundreds of inscrutable parts that went into it.

                People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time or just flat-out lying, because the plain truth of the matter is that if they could, somebody already would have, and you'd be able to just go out to a 7-11 and buy the damn thing for half off with the purchase of a medium or large fountain drink.
    • Re:HDD Q (Score:5, Informative)

      by ip_fired (730445) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:01AM (#11405618) Homepage
      It appears from the pictures that the ATA100 connector that they have in there is the small form factor found on the ibook/powerbook motherboards, so I would imagine that the hard drive is also a laptop harddrive. This is unfortunate as they aren't as fast as their larger siblings.
      • Re:HDD Q (Score:5, Insightful)

        by GreatDrok (684119) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:37AM (#11405799) Journal
        You know, I am sitting here using my Apple iBook G4 933Mhz and wondering why people get so wound up about the 'lack' of power in the new Mac mini. The only thing I would do is upgrade the RAM as I did with this iBook (added 512MB for £75 from crucial) which makes the machine nice and snappy. Other than that, the G4 is a great processor because it runs cool (my iBook is currently running at about 40 degrees Celsius and the fan doesn't kick in until it hits 75 so it is virtually silent. Same will be true of the Mac mini. Compare that to a typical cheap PC. Also, my iBook has the same graphics capabilities and a slower CPU than the mini but it is able to play UT2004 at 1024x768 surprisingly well, better than the Geforce4MX my PC came with.

        All things considered, the Mac mini will be a great machine to use and own. Mac OS X works smoothly even on a sub 1Ghz G4 so the mini is going to be ample. More to the point, where my XP Pro box with Athlon XP 2200+ and 512MB of RAM quite often feels slow and bogged down the iBook multitasks much better. I doubt that the slow hard drive in the Mac mini is going to be that big an issue either. Just do yourself a favour if you buy one, get the cheapest and stick some Crucial RAM in it (512MB is the sweet spot). I would get a Mac keyboard but use a standard 3 button scroll wheel mouse and put a good quality 17" LCD on there. That is going to get you a really nice Mac for budget PC money and it will run OS X, something I think is worth a great deal.
    • by Leo McGarry (843676) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:19AM (#11405712)
      I've seen lots and lots of PowerBooks in my line of work. Practically everybody I encounter, professionally, has one.

      Know how many PC cards I've seen? Zero. Nary a one.

      Since you're going to put the necessary ports on the machine anyway, and since you're going to build wireless antennas in anyway, what possible use is there for a PC card slot? Leave it out and keep costs down.
    • by mosb1000 (710161) <mosb1000@mac.com> on Wednesday January 19 2005, @02:22AM (#11405726) Homepage
      "they have the same weight and size as the iMAc mini. Only the videocard is better in the iMac mini, otherwise ePC-2-3 are better, more ports (e-PC3-2 firewire, 4Highspeed USB, serial, parallel,video out AND A PC CARD SLOT. IN ADDITION USERS ARE ALLOWED TO OPEN THE BOX"

      Well, that's all well and good if you only want ports, but lets look at the facts.

      EZ-GO ePC-2 (Base System)
      Processor: 1.1Ghz intel celeron
      memory: 128 MB SDRAM
      video: integrated video (11.8MB max shared)
      HD: 40GB
      Optical Drive: 24x CD-ROM
      Price: $589

      mac mini (Base System)
      Processor 1.25Ghz Power PC G4
      memory: 256 MB
      Video: Radeon 9200 w/ 32MB memory
      HD: 40GB
      Optical Drive: DVD ROM/CD-RW
      Price: $499

      It looks to me like the mac mini is a superior system in almost every way, and costs $90 less.
    • Re:Not bad Apple (Score:5, Insightful)

      by beelsebob (529313) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @03:37AM (#11406053)
      Why on earth would you want to put Mandrake on it when you've already got a beautiful unix based OS with it. And why on earth would you want a PowerPC box to put linux on? Bob
      • by nathanh (1214) on Wednesday January 19 2005, @05:48AM (#11406450) Homepage
        Why on earth would you want to put Mandrake on it when you've already got a beautiful unix based OS with it. And why on earth would you want a PowerPC box to put linux on? Bob

        Why should he not?

        Linux rocks. Mac Mini rocks. The two together obviously rock twice as hard.

        Are you seriously suggesting that nobody could possibly prefer Linux once they've used MacOS X? Think again, buddy.