Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Ballmer Says iPod Users are Thieves

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Oct 04, 2004 08:16 AM
from the hurting-my-feelings dept.
A 'music thief' (apparently) writes "According to Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft: "The most common format of music on an iPod is 'stolen'." He appears convinced Microsoft will lead the way in Digital Rights Management and also believes Microsoft will steal a march on Apple in making the digital home a reality because Apple "doesn't have the volumes". "There is no way that you can get there with Apple. The critical mass has to come from the PC, or a next-generation video device," he said."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 04 2004, @08:17AM (#10427814)
    They stolds it frums us.
    • by turnstyle (588788) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:27AM (#10427944) Homepage
      Ok, Slashdotters!

      1) Roughly what percent of your music collection is unauthorized files from P2P like Kazaa, FTP, etc.?

      2) Roughly what percent of your music collection comes from sources like iTunes Music Store, eMusic, etc?

      3) Roughly what percent of your music collection comes from shareable sources like Creative Commons-licensed music?

      4) Roughly what percent of your music collection comes from rips of your own CDs?

      5) Roughly what percent of your music collection comes from rips of friends' CDs?

      (and what am I missing?)

  • Pot... (Score:5, Funny)

    by mikeophile (647318) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:17AM (#10427817)
    meet kettle.
    • Re:Pot... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by frankthechicken (607647) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:21AM (#10427865) Journal
      Agreed, taking Ballmers arguements, I think it could be almost guarenteed that as much music stored on an iPod could be considered stolen as that found on a PC.

      Especially when you consider the fact that most iPod owners are Windows users, and the music they've uploaded was previously on their PC.

      Part of the reason people steal music is money, but some of it is that the DRM stuff out there has not been that easy to use.

      Found this quote interesting, does it really state that people want to use DRM to copy music at home, but can't quite figure out how to use it?
    • Re:Pot... (Score:5, Funny)

      by rseuhs (322520) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:27AM (#10427951)
      Ballmer: "We are going to continue to improve our DRM, to make it harder to crack, and easier, easier, easier, easier, to use."

      I guess that will be done by developers, developers, developers, developers...

  • by TimmyDee (713324) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:18AM (#10427831) Homepage Journal
    That's exactly how you win customers -- by alienating them.
    • by tha_mink (518151) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:25AM (#10427912)
      That's exactly how you win customers -- by alienating them.

      His target "customers" are people like the music industry which he is not alienating. He knows that users are stupid for the most part and will buy what's cheaper and more popular so he doesn't mid alienating them.
    • by rseuhs (322520) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:33AM (#10428025)
      Alienating them works quite well when you have a dominating position in the market: Breaking your wordprocessing format will force your users to upgrade, breaking SMB compatibility will temporarily make life harder for Samba and - you got it - will force some users to upgrade, too.

      I think the higher-ups at Microsoft have completely lost the sense of how to do business in a healthy market.

      That's why everything Microsoft does fails or produces massive losses when not being pushed by the PC domination.

      Just look at Hailstorm. Or XBox. Or Windows/Alpha.

  • But... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PenguiN42 (86863) <taylok2@@@alum...rpi...edu> on Monday October 04 2004, @08:19AM (#10427832) Journal
    ... you can use iPods with the PC. What's this about "critical mass"?
    • by number6x (626555) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:51AM (#10428226)

      Well, yeah right now most iPod users have pcs. Of course when Longhorn arrives, there will be a little problem uploading your music, and every now and then the entire iPod memory will be wiped.

      You know that MS will be working hard for a solution...

      From MS marketing, 2006:

      "It's probably due to Apple's implementation of some standard."

      "You could get a solution quicker if you switch to our new win-Pod(TM) that implements Microsoft standards. It uses a new version of Embedded Windows Media Player(TM). Here's a coupon for %75 off your purchase price, and we have a $20.oo rebate as well."

      "But we'll keep working on that i-pod 'fix', don't you worry. When the 'fix' is in, you'll know it!"

      Microsoft, The job isn't done until Lotus, Novell, Netscape, iPod won't run

  • by SpooForBrains (771537) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:19AM (#10427835)
    M$ systems sell very well. M$ peripherals, not so much. No amount of FUD, or lawyer-posturing, will get an M$ audio system into people's pockets over the iPod. It's too late.
  • Mad? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Peridriga (308995) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:19AM (#10427841)
    I really don't know why Balmer is so mad at Ipod?

    He really seems to love his [mac.com]...

  • by Realistic_Dragon (655151) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:20AM (#10427844) Homepage
    ...is 74.8 stolen copies of Windows XP Professional.
  • by gr8_phk (621180) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:20AM (#10427845)
    "The critical mass has to come from the PC, or a next-generation video device," he said."

    I think he means: 'the critical mass has to come from windows'. Why? No technical reason, it's just because people at MS will have a temper tamtrum if this doesn't go their way.

  • by RAMMS+EIN (578166) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:21AM (#10427863) Homepage Journal
    ``Microsoft will steal a march on Apple in making the digital home a reality because Apple "doesn't have the volumes". The critical mass has to come from the PC, or a next-generation video device''

    Seems to me that Apple is a lot more successful in pushing large volumes of next generation devices than MS.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 04 2004, @08:27AM (#10427950)
      When you see an iPod on the cover of Newsweek with a large peice inside about how Apple and Jobs have created one of the biggest fashion trends this century, one which rivals the introduction of the Sony Walkman in the 80's, I'd say that Apple have been pretty damn successful in pushing the concept of the "Digital Home".

      I've not see anything exciting come from Microsoft in a very long time. I don't believe people are all that interested in the sort of "Digital Home" Microsoft seem to envision, either.
  • by vortexjc (818906) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:21AM (#10427870)
    I took that comment as Steve Ballmer saying more digital music is pirated then not. Does everyone on this board actually disagree with that?
    • by hype7 (239530) <`emptyskies' `at' `mac.com'> on Monday October 04 2004, @08:53AM (#10428239) Journal
      I took that comment as Steve Ballmer saying more digital music is pirated then not. Does everyone on this board actually disagree with that?


      This isn't about music piracy. This is about Ballmer taking a shot at Apple because they have a product which is user focused, whereas MS have a product which is RIAA focused.

      Else, he would have just said that "more digital music is pirated than not". But he didn't, did he?

      -- james
  • by MikeDX (560598) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:22AM (#10427880) Journal
    Or did MP3s only become popular *BECAUSE* the music was stolen in the first place anyway?? And so the trend

    Mp3s -> Mp3 Players -> ???? -> Profit ?

    I may not be speaking for the masses, but the key thing about having my music in my player of choice (Archos AV340) is the fact that I can take the music from *any* source, and because I choose to download the mp3s rather than re-recording from original Vinyl, ripping from CD, remastering from cassette, 8track etc Is purely a matter of my taste and value of my time.

    Prevent people from using music easily that they ALREADY LEGAL OWN in one format or another, and see that format/player go the way of the BETAMAX.
  • by your_mother_sews_soc (528221) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:22AM (#10427887)
    I find I buy more music now that own an iPod. And I am not implying that I ever "borrowed" any previously. I have about 700+ tracks on my iPod and when the feeling moves me I go to iTunes and buy another album. The ITMS library is growing, too, and now includes a sizeable collection of the works of Brian Eno (great for coding, writing specs, so on.) I don't know where Monkey Boy Ballmer gets his info, and wouldn't want to go there. Unless all the interns at Microsoft trade music freely ...
  • Unreal. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Weaselmancer (533834) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:24AM (#10427900)

    From the article:

    "We've had DRM in Windows for years. The most common format of music on an iPod is 'stolen'."

    Because everybody knows windows is all about security. If you put a pirated mp3 on a windows box, the drm system won't allow you to access it. All the windows boxes running eMule and Kaaza are merely figments of your imagination. They're iPods. Honest.

  • He doesn't get it (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bblazer (757395) * on Monday October 04 2004, @08:25AM (#10427916) Homepage Journal
    Since I got my iPod and used a decent music service iTunes, there have been no 'shared' music on my player. Balmer thinks that Apple cant get the job done - can he say iPod for Windows? As long as Apple continues to make accessories for other OS'es, they will have no problem competing.
  • by jbarr (2233) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:26AM (#10427928) Homepage
    Yet another attempt to disseminate the false notion that MP3 files amount to stolen music. If I purchase a CD and rip it to MP3s for my own use, the resulting files are certainly not stolen--plain and simple. And if I get them from a legal online source, again, they are not stolen.

    Just because someone COULD steal something doesn't mean they will, and doesn't automatically make the something stolen.
  • by aredubya74 (266988) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:28AM (#10427961)
    ...on an iPod is 'stolen'.

    Balmer, "iPod" can easily be replaced with "Windows" in your preceding statement. MP3 has been the de facto standard for music files for 7-8 years now, maybe longer. Were iPods around 7-8 years ago? No. What were they played on? Windows, under Winamp. The masses have understood how to rip their own (un-DRM'd) CDs since the turn of the millenium. Napster, Limewire, Kazaa, eDonkey and many more of flourished (til legal proceedings crush each) with trading of these files. I don't recall using my iPod to access any of these services. Oh yes, that's right. I used my Windows-running PC.

    I know it's FUD, but this is just plain lousy FUD. Anyone with half a brain can see right through his attempt to link Windows with anti-piracy.
  • by VFVTHUNTER (66253) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:28AM (#10427963) Homepage
    from Ballmer:

    "My 12-year-old at home doesn't want to hear that he can't put all the music that he wants in all of the places that he would like it," he joked.

    Translation:
    "When I tried to use my kid's iPod on a recent family trip, my son told me to shove my Barry Manilow CD up my ass."
  • by GoMMiX (748510) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:28AM (#10427968)
    According to Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft: "The most common format of music on an iPod is 'stolen'.

    Uhh, yeah... And the most common format of music on a Windows PC iiiiiissss...........? Uhh huh, yeah.

    So, if ANY company is accountable for music theft -- OBVIOUSLY it's Microsoft - they have the 'volumes,' right?

    Bah! /end rant
  • So what? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by YeeHaW_Jelte (451855) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:29AM (#10427971) Homepage
    Most microsoft users are thieves too ... if they actually bought the OS chances are they're running at least one piece of software which was copied illegally.

    And then again ... wtf? Stolen? Copyright infringement is not the same as stealing something, whatever the demagogues like Balmer want you to believe.
  • Yeah, and? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by hattig (47930) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:30AM (#10427989) Journal
    If someone has a budget for buying CDs/music each year, say $300, then even if they download extra music illegally, no-one is losing out as long as the consumer is still spending what they have budgeted to spend.

    Music is a commodity these days. It isn't special like it was in the 50's. People expect music at all hours, but it isn't priced right to meet the current usage of music, so people download the extra music they need to fill in the gap.

    I don't see how Microsoft can claim any kind of moral superiority over Apple. Apple at least had the decency to offer reasonably priced legal music quite some time ago. Per-song pricing allows you to take a small risk to discover new music, or just get the 2 good songs on a modern pop album that are any good. MSN Music is a lot more recent.

    I can only assume that Microsoft will be designing Media Software that will not play non-MS-approved content. Otherwise how can it tell whether a song you are playing is something you ripped yourself, or downloaded? Surely you could burn a CD and re-rip if Microsoft enforced that type of requirement?

    These big companies are only pissed off because online music sharing allows people to discover new music that isn't on the big labels, and then spend money on that music instead of HypedTrash. Most studies show that music purchasing hasn't dropped since file sharing started, at the worst it fluctuated in line with the economy, at best it has actually soared over what it should have been.
  • by Wansu (846) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:31AM (#10428000)

    ... according to Ballmer.

    "My 12-year-old at home doesn't want to hear that he can't put all the music that he wants in all of the places that he would like it,"

    I don't want to hear that either.
  • by intheory (261976) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:31AM (#10428002) Journal
    ...is stolen.

    So what if "[you've] had DRM in Windows for years" Microsoft? Windows did anything but halt the 13.6 million Napster users [wikipedia.org] "stealing" music, et cetera.
  • by Greyfox (87712) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:34AM (#10428036) Homepage Journal
    But we already knew that. No one's going to buy his intentionaally crippled device, and we've already seen repeatedly just how well copy protection works in the commercial market. Microsoft will try to ram their device down the throat of the marketplace with their usual tactic (Sell as a loss-leader until no competition is left, then dramatically raise prices) but people have already had a taste of actually being able to choose how they want to do things, so I don't believe it will work this time around.

    So Steve, STFU and GTFO. The reflected light from your forehead is blinding us.

  • by archeopterix (594938) * on Monday October 04 2004, @08:34AM (#10428041) Journal
    IMHO, Apple is already there with ease of use (who'da thought) and choice of songs.

    The thought that Microsoft can compete with "better" DRM is laughable. Show me a user that will switch to another DRM system, because, you know - it's better at limitting your freedom better, so you should switch to it, you filthy thief, right?

    My thoughts for Ballmer: good luck in alienating your potential customers!

  • Ha (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Sheepdot (211478) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:35AM (#10428047) Journal
    I don't know if Ballmer has been paying attention.

    My roommate is a die-hard Microsoft fan. I don't just mean he uses Windows over Linux, either. I mean he will get compromised because of a failed update, have to reformat and reinstall, and he *still* favors MS. Why? Because of usability. Linux does not cater towards him and it certainly doesn't offer the gameplay. Mozilla/Firefox, despite what I try to tell him about security, is laughable. After all, why should he use a browser that takes 4 seconds to load a 2 second page?

    Now, despite all of that, he uses iTunes. Why? Because where other "free software" fails, Apple does not. They provide a method for him to get what he needs when he needs it. And not only that, but he pays money hand over fist for services/music through iTunes.

    So my question to Ballmer would have to be: If you've lost even your fanbois to Apple, who also has DRM, how exactly do you intend to actually gain a foothold in this market?

    On a perfectly safe side note, the percentage of my "stolen" music collection used to be 100% MP3, now it's 80% MP3. Any MS representative want to take a guess as to what the other format is for my stolen music?
  • by kahei (466208) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:35AM (#10428048) Homepage
    ...is Steve Ballmer. Seriously. They put a marketeer in charge -- bankruptcy at 11.

    Ballmer's appointment marked a switch from customer focus and innovation (all the GNU type people should go off and hate me quietly in a corner at this point) to concept focus and buzzwords. It's amazing to think that there was a time (early-mid 90's) when if I wanted a vendor who'd actually listen and do stuff, I wanted MS. Now, they literally can't make a single statement without chanting a mantra -- 'developers! xml! digital nervous system! drm!' and getting actual action from them is like blood from a stone. Actual development units remain largely unchanged -- but they simply aren't running the show now.

    It's a tragedy of classic proportions, with Microsoft as the protagonist and Ballmer as the hubris that drives him to his fatal excesses -- and maybe IBM/Linux as the nemesis waiting around the corner.

    I am _so_ not looking forward to everything being run by IBM again :/

  • hahahah (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TubeSteak (669689) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:40AM (#10428102) Journal
    Maybe we should ask the RIAA [riaa.com] about this disturbing trend. What! You mean everyone they've sued so far was using Windows! Hmmm.... Not even one Linux or Mac user.

    I guess its a good thing that Windows users are responsible and would never do something like steal music and put it on an iPod... even though Windows makes up around 90% of the installed user base.

  • by Raven42rac (448205) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:46AM (#10428166)
    What is this sweaty ogre talking about? I have 1605 songs, not one is illegal, they are either ripped from my own collection, or purchased from the iTMS. If iPod owners, were thieves, why would they be spending upwards of $500 on a music player? I am sure they will lobby congress for a legal monopoly on music now.
  • by ceeam (39911) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:47AM (#10428184)
    If musicians (whoever they are) think that modern technology rips them off, they are always free to go back to old-fashioned ways, like, you know - going in wagons here and there and people will throw them money in their hats. Hard to steal that, right?

    Dang, what makes them believe that they are entitled to millions and care-free lives by making a couple of template "songs" about fucks and drugs?

  • Hmm... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by daveschroeder (516195) * on Monday October 04 2004, @08:49AM (#10428197)
    His distinction doesn't even make sense. He says Windows Media has had DRM for years, and then somehow ties that to the majority of the iPod's music being stolen, presumably a veiled reference to the fact that iPod uses a different format.

    But that logic doesn't follow, because iPod's "paid" format ("Protected AAC") contains DRM (though in Apple's implementation is probably more forgiving and transparent than some alternatives). The "stolen" format he must be referring to is, therefore, MP3, a format that is also supported by all portable music players that support Windows Media!

    Since Apple's music store - which only works with iPod - has by far the largest market share of all online music stores, there is actually more legitimately purchased downloaded music (to say nothing of legally purchased CDs that have then been ripped) in use on iPods than on players that support Windows Media. If there are "stolen" MP3s in use on iPod, then there are stolen MP3s in use on ANY player that supports MP3 in the same proportions. And even if we concede that there might be physically more stolen music on iPods, in numbers of songs, it's only because iPods so ridiculously vastly outnumber any competitive player...not because iPods somehow magically enable more easy theft, when it's MP3 - not the iPod's "scary different non-Windows Media format", which IS DRM'ed - that constitutes the "theft", which is possible on ANY other player! [1]

    So, to sum up: nuthin' but FUD.

    [1] Except perhaps Sony's. ;-) (Yes, yes, I know they've announced they'll support MP3.)
    • by tha_mink (518151) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:22AM (#10427877)
      The "as far as corporate America..." means that if the world was using a Microsoft based device, then they could force everything to be played in a format in which they could use their DRM system to insure that everything played was paid for and legal.

      Which means that corporate America (ex. the music industry) should start helping MS gain more market share in that market.
    • I don't understand the "corporate America" distinction.


      it has to do with the fact that the RIAA wants DRM, and the user doesn't. so Ballmer's looking after the corporate interests ahead of the user interests.

      What's funny is that he doesn't realise that new entertainment formats are mostly demand driven. People don't like div-x (the old one, where you had to "connect" to get movies), people don't use it. Same with DVD-A and SACD. Invariably, formats with draconian restrictions on them don't work. And although he wants to label people thieves, there's a very good reason why the iPod is popular, and MS's DRM isn't. The irony is Ballmer himself points it out in the article - "My 12-year-old at home doesn't want to hear that he can't put all the music that he wants in all of the places that he would like it". This isn't about stealing, it's about fair use. 12 year olds just want to do whatever they want to do with their music - like the rest of us. If stolen, free music is the only way we can get there, then so be it. Why pay for restrictions, when freedom is quite literally free?

      It makes me laugh, the 12-y-o son of the man running the most powerful IT company in the world gets it, but Ballmer himself doesn't.

      Which oddly enough is a theme repeated in the second article - his vision for the digital home - which involves "converged devices that integrate video, audio and computer technology". He's pretty much ripped off Steve Jobs' digital hub strategy [macworld.com] from two years ago... and then he goes on to say: "There is no way that you can get there with Apple."

      Sorry Steve, the only organisation you can be guaranteed to not get there with is Microsoft. It makes poor copies of good products, labels consumers who want freedom "thieves", and calls out organisations who innovate as not being good enough.

      -- james
    • "There is no way that you can get there with Apple. The critical mass has to come from the PC, or a next-generation video device,"
      I want what he's smoking!
      • by michrech (468134) on Monday October 04 2004, @08:38AM (#10428081)
        1) Any new computer purchased from Dell

        2) Any new computer purchased from Gateway

        3) Any new computer purchased from HP

        4) Any new computer purchased from Compaq

        5) Any new computer purchased from the company I work for

        6) Any new computer purchased from GlobalComputer/TigerDirect under the "SysteMax" name

        I really could go on and on. You sir, are in idot in the worst way; Or a troll. One of the two.

        (Now, the above isn't to say that the users of said brand new computers won't 'borrow' some software from friends/family, but makes it a far cry less than "%100 stolded" as you had suggested. Rare indeed.)

      • Seriously, unless it's a corporate computer, have you really seen one where the user would have paid a single red cent for any of the soft/data, other than the kids' games?

        A single red cent, no. Many thousands of red cents, yes.
    • Re:Probably true (Score:5, Insightful)

      by hype7 (239530) <`emptyskies' `at' `mac.com'> on Monday October 04 2004, @08:49AM (#10428205) Journal
      Pretty true. I'm sure that there will be 10 or so +5 rated posters who say that all the music on their iPod is legit, but Slashdot isn't indicative of the world and you'd be niave to think anything else.


      And what does this prove? I could level the exact same claim at Windows users - most home copies of Windows are pirated (unless OEM) - and anyway, how does the music get onto the iPod?

      Hmm, maybe via a computer. And Windows users are using the iPods too!

      Probably true. Microsoft have control of the desktop market and are playing into the content providers hands. They'll happily embrace anything which is stricter on the end-user in the name of revenues and he knows it.


      What MS embraces is less important than what consumers embrace, and they have a habit of not embracing restrictive formats. Like DIV-X (the old version, where you had to connect to get permission to play your movie); and DVD-A / SACD.

      Again probably true. Think a couple of years down the line when you either have a choice of 4 models supporting AAC+ or 150 products all supporting WMA.


      Jobs has said that he will open up AAC playback if the iPod market share drops below #1. Similarly, he will consider putting WMA playback on the iPod if the iTMS falls below #1.

      But right now, despite the absolute lack of competition, the cheaper songs/players elsewhere - the iPod is #1, and so is the iTMS. Every time a consumer chooses either, they create a barrier for themselves to using another service. Who wants to change all their music formats, etc over?


      Not forgetting the intense competition from both hardware manufacturers and those who run WMA music stores - in which both will be aiming to provide the best features and functionality for the best price. When Apple's only competition is themselves, then there is less of an incentive (look at Palm procrastinating for years as a fine example)


      Yeah, or Microsoft procrastinating in the OS market. Your analogy is flawed. Apple have created this market with one product - the product has defined the market. People don't want a music player, they want an iPod. And which music store is the only one to work with an iPod when they want to try legal downloaded music?

      You guessed it.


      Generally I think he's pretty much on the ball, although I have no doubt that the predictable response from Slashbots will be "i won't buy from Microsoft" and "All my music is legit" - when, in fact, there are a lot of people who will and also have large numbers of music on their iPod which is legally questionable.


      Your point being? I think Ballmer's way off, and it is reflected by Microsoft's market share in this market. Consumers don't want MS DRM, and Apple has a better product all round.

      -- james