Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Microsoft Unhappy With HP's iTunes Decision

Posted by timothy on Mon Jan 12, 2004 09:46 PM
from the limiting-choices-incorporated dept.
rbrandis writes "The general manager of Microsoft's Windows digital media division David Fester has suggested that iTunes' emerging dominance would be bad for consumers, because it would limit them to the iPod, as opposed to limiting them to Microsoft based products. In a moment of what must have been an attempt at ironic humor he said, 'Windows is about choice - you can mix and match software and music player stuff. We believe you should have the same choice when it comes to music services.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • i do have a choice (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Triumph The Insult C (586706) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:47PM (#7958923) Homepage Journal
    and i choose to not use your "enabling" products
  • Bad for consumers? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DrLudicrous (607375) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:47PM (#7958924) Homepage
    I think what he really meant is that is would be bad for Microsoft.
  • NEWS FLASH! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Aliencow (653119) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:47PM (#7958932) Homepage Journal
    Microsoft not happy that people take advantage of their own non-Microsoft monopolies!

    Why don't they sue Apple ? Hell, iTunes is bundled with OS X! Because they'll bundle a music store with media player soon enough... and try to kill iTunes completely.
  • by rborek (563153) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:49PM (#7958948)
    As bad as people may hate Microsoft or Media Player, it does support multiple players and platforms - not just the iPod. A list is available at http://windowsmedia.com/9series/Personalization/Co olDevices.asp [windowsmedia.com].
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 12 2004, @09:50PM (#7958952)
    I am ever so grateful that once again Microsoft is looking after my best interests. We can all sleep well.
  • by TheWart (700842) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:50PM (#7958953)
    Dell says this:

    "According to the New York Times, Dell also suggests HP is making a mistake. A Dell spokesman said: "We expect competition and it's good for customers. Over time, however, customers will want industry standard choices.''"

    I am no English expert, but it sure sounds like they are tryin to say that WMA should be the only game in town, and are at the same time trying to play it off that they 'want' competition.
    • by zbaron (649094) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:07PM (#7959152)
      Over time we will see the industry decide what will be used as a standard for the distribution of digital audio, I guess Dell and friends just don't want the "industry standard" to turn out to be MPEG-4/AAC.
    • Actually, you're reading the whole article wrong. The article isn't about the music format -- it's about the music service. You're probably right in that Microsoft wants WMA to be the leading digital format, but what they really want is for a ton of companies to be offering music services, all competing against each other and, hopefully for MSFT, all using WMA. The primary benefit, of course, is market share.
    • by Soko (17987) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:16PM (#7959237) Homepage
      I think you're right. According to Carly,

      "The next big thing isn't the next gizmo or killer app or hot box. Customers want all this to work together and they want a seamless approach. We're very much going to make sure that the Microsoft and Apple worlds work together. That's part of the power we bring to this thing."

      meaning HP is treating Microsoft as just another supplier, where Dell can't.

      So, IMHO, because HPs CEO has more balls ;^D than Dell's CEO, they're willing to go against "industry standards", namely anything Microsoft tries to cram down thier throats, and give customers what they want.

      Yay competition!

      Soko
      • by El (94934) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:28PM (#7959350)
        Uh, 99% of Dell's business is selling Windows boxes, and they're making good money at it. ~15% of HP's business is selling Windows boxes, and they're losing money hand over fist at it. I'm sure HP would just LOVE an excuse to get out of the PC and Laptop business, and focus on other areas where they can make a profit. Now, which one of the two can AFFORD to piss off Microsoft?
    • by FattMattP (86246) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:20PM (#7959282) Homepage
      Over time, however, customers will want industry standard choices.
      A clue for Dell: iPod and iTMS is the industry standard.
    • I am no English expert, but it sure sounds like they are tryin to say that WMA should be the only game in town, and are at the same time trying to play it off that they 'want' competition.

      Doubletalk is doubleplus good!

      Its a sentence constructed in a way that is meant to make its readers come off with a feeling that 1) Dell wants what's best for them, 2) Dell made industry choices based on what is best for the costumer (damned lie), 3) Dell's choice will become a standard, and therefore: if you buy a different standard than what Dell is selling you will be buying something that will be nonstandard in the future (ooooh, bad!).

      In other words: FUD.
      • by MikeMo (521697) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:09PM (#7959166)
        How is Quicktime part of this discussion? Apple's iTMS is in AAC format. The iPod supports AAC, MP3, Audible, AIFF, and WAV except WMA.

        AND btw, AAC *is* an industry standard. It's just not the one Microsoft wants. WMA, on the other hand, is *proprietary*, and is not a "standard" at all. Just like all the other Windows stuff, the like to call it "the standard" simply because it's popular, and because they get away with it. Another example of doublespeak!
  • by corebreech (469871) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:51PM (#7958966) Journal
    It has always been questionable as to whether they would get DRM to work in the first place. Now along comes HP, trying to make what are essentially incompatible DRM systems work together, and still protect content. The closest analogy I can think of is trying to have make a marriage work with two spouses at the same time.

    Anybody who has installed any kind of media player on Windows knows what I'm talking about... it's almost impossible to assign specific file types to Window's Media Player, QuickTime, RealPlayer, Winamp, etc., without all of these applications trying to steal the right to handle these file types out from one another. Now the same thing is going to happen, but with DRM in the mix?

    It's going to be a zoo. Nobody is going to stand still for this, especially when people start losing the right to access content they've already payed for.

    And just wait till this shit starts happening to everybody's porn collection. People will be running amok in the streets.
    • Wrong. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by DAldredge (2353) <SlashdotEmail@GMail.Com> on Monday January 12 2004, @09:57PM (#7959036) Journal
      This is the same 'No American has a God given right to a job' Carly that said that EVERY HP product coming out after Q2 2004 will have DRM built in. Hell, she even wants to make recording like a VCR on your HP impossible unless the copyright holder agrees.

      She is no ones friend save for herself and her fellow exec. She thinks nothing of the employers/users/shareholder of HP.
  • MS = Choice = BAH! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by spoco2 (322835) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:53PM (#7958988) Homepage
    Crap Microsoft, Crap indeed. You are now lying through your... well, backside. MS = Choice my arse.

    Microsoft is ALL about cornering you into using MS products...

    PRIME example is their damn Movie Maker 2... quite nice program to use (I haven't used iMovie, so I can't compare), but then try and save... "Hmmm, I'd like to save to an open format that pretty much anyone can play... VCD or SVCD, or perhaps just plain MPEG would be nice." "Hmmm, I seem to ONLY be able to save to MS formats unless I have a few gig free to save out to a straight DV dump and then use someone else's program to convert to a more user friendly format, so really I'm forcing anyone who wants to watch movies I've made to have an MS compatible player"

    "Hmmm, MS can blow me, and blow me hard"
      • by b-baggins (610215) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:35PM (#7959399) Journal
        Except that, Apple gives you the free iMovie App and allows you to save in DV and any quicktime supported codec (including DIVX if you install the plug-in) etc. So, yeah, I'm going to gripe about substandard "free" software from Microsoft.
  • Betamax vs. VHS (Score:5, Interesting)

    by davejenkins (99111) <slashdot.davejenkins@com> on Monday January 12 2004, @09:54PM (#7959000) Homepage
    Yes, it is an old example, and yes, it is simplistic-- but it is still very relevant: Betamax vs. VHS.

    Sony had a superior quality format for videotape (betamax), but wouldn't share with anyone. Meanwhile, Panasonic, Philips, and others all got together and agreed on VHS format. Competition brought lower priced machines, and eventually VHS killed betamax for home use.

    Microsoft is half-right: it is about choice-- but it must ALL be available for choice: the hardware, the OS, the apps, the data format. Only true, open standards under a GPL, LGPL, or other similar "free to evolve independent of any single vendor"-type license will work in the long run.
  • Honest Question (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cmason32 (636063) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:56PM (#7959022)
    Is there anything preventing other companies from making an mp3 player that would play iTMS files? I realize that other companies can make players that play the AAC format, but is Apple preventing them from accessing the DRM?
  • AppleTurns (Score:5, Insightful)

    by computerme (655703) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:58PM (#7959049)
    AppleTurns site translated it this way:

    Check it out, this was the best a company spokesperson could muster to undercut the announcement: "Windows is all about choice... we believe you should have the same choice when it comes to music services." Translation: "Use any service you want as long as it sells Windows Media, buy any player out there as long as it plays Windows Media-- but for heaven's sake, don't buy one of those wretched iPod thingies or we'll be completely boned with our whole plan to monopolize digital media commerce and then we might actually have to start innovating for our paychecks for a change." Or, to put it a little more succinctly, "you can have any color you want, as long as it's black."
  • iPod vs Dell DJ (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Mage66 (732291) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:59PM (#7959059)
    The bottom line is that the iPod and iTunes provides a better user experience.

    I had a 5gb 1st Gen iPod, and I now have a Dell DJ (Dell gave me the credit, Apple wouldn't).

    I prefer the iPod.

    The DJ works ok, but the user experience isn't as good.

    There's no way to stop a playing song. Only pause it.

    Syncing music is not intutitive.

    Navigating through the tracks on the DJ takes FOREVER.

    It's just not as well thought out as iTunes and the iPod are.

    I'm thinking of selling my Dell DJ on eBay, and buying an iPod or an iPod mini.

  • by Soko (17987) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:59PM (#7959068) Homepage
    Windows is not about choice - it is about having developers and service providers further entrench the Windows hegonomy, with little to no effort on the part of MS.

    HP made a choice, as the market seems to be doing as well.

    Let's see how well Microsoft lives with this.

    Oh, and to all of you who say "Watch how high the price of Windows goes for HP", Microsoft won't dare do anything of the sort. Having both IBM and HP actively looking to kill Windows is not something Microsoft shareholders would appreciate.

    Soko
  • by WIAKywbfatw (307557) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:00PM (#7959070) Journal
    Then why does it do everything possible to destroy it? Lotus 1-2-3 for Dos, WordPerfect (countless times), DR-DOS, OS/2, OpenDoc, Go/pen computing, Netscape, Java - and those are only the examples I can think of off the top of my head.

    In fact, there has never been a more monopolistic, closed technology advocate than Microsoft. If someone comes up with something original, or something that's superior to anything Microsoft can engineer, then they'll be driven into the ground by the full force of the Microsoft machine.

    I use Microsoft products (eg, Windows 2000, Office) and I also use non-Microsoft products that compete directly with the company's offerings (eg, Opera, Winamp). I'm not pro- or anti-Microsoft. What I am is pro-choice. And, frankly, that's one thing Microsoft can accurately never claim to be.
  • After all . . . (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Mikey-San (582838) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:00PM (#7959072) Homepage Journal
    If you can't beat 'em, FUD 'em.

    Remember, kiddies, that Microsoft is never about competing. Otherwise, they'd still be working on IE for Mac OS X, instead of complaining that another browser beat them.

    Take your toys and go home, I say. We don't want you here.
  • by sstory (538486) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:01PM (#7959081) Homepage
    Windows IS about Choice.
    Also,
    Slavery is Freedom
    and
    War is Peace

    If I remember my Orwell right.

  • There're two basic methods of Innovation at work here, Apple's brand and Microsoft's. Microsoft wants to leverage the choice of software tools made by third-party developers (that they haven't driven under by co-opting technology from) to promote a "choice" among applications on the Windows platform.

    Apple wants to provide the "choice" of a Non-Windows platform and non-Microsoft technology. And Apple, for all their ills as far as co-opting technology in ways distressingly similar to Microsoft, has never been known to utterly decimate the competition or actively belittle or disparage them. What Apple does when they add new features to the OS is to simply set the bar higher for 3rd party developers.

    Apple bothers me in some things, but when it comes right down to it, I don't see Apple trying dirty tricks in the background to drive anyone away from creating music services for the Mac platform. Microsoft would just -love- to push vendors into a MS Music Store lock in.
  • by Amiga Trombone (592952) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:05PM (#7959125)
    HP believes that it is better positioned than any other company to bridge the gap between Apple and Windows. Fiorina told the Times: "The next big thing isn't the next gizmo or killer app or hot box. Customers want all this to work together and they want a seamless approach. We're very much going to make sure that the Microsoft and Apple worlds work together. That's part of the power we bring to this thing."

    This is probably the only remotely interesting initiative HP has embarked on since Carly took over.

    Let's hope it's more successful than most of them have been.
  • by Arkham (10779) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:12PM (#7959190)
    As you can see in this document [apple.com], iTunes supports quite a lot of different third-party players, including Nomads, Rios, and others.

    What these other players do NOT support is AAC-DRM files like those sold by the iTMS. I'm sure Apple would be happy to license their DRM scheme to a third-party mp3 player if they wanted to do so and the price were right. Money talks.
  • by Stevyn (691306) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:15PM (#7959227)
    Microsoft said they were about choice! Now the linux zealots can all flame them on slashdot and go to sleep happy. The apple users can chime in their love for ipods and itunes. The windows fanboys can chime in how wma is surperior and that it will take over and crush apple and linux. Once the rubble has settled the 1862 ogg users can tout a new media format world order and reign for the next 1000 years. Good times a commin'!

    If microsoft did this once a month, IT productivity would go up 10%.
  • WHO is David Fester? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Crypto Gnome (651401) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:29PM (#7959361) Homepage Journal
    "We are going to produce a patch that should be up within a week," said Microsoft's David Fester, group product manager for Internet Explorer. "We'll put up that patch as quick as we can."

    Internet Explorer Bug Makes a Return Visit [wired.com]

    In 1998 he was the management flunky most directly responsible for all those MSIE bugs.

    "On the one hand, they say they're pursuing standards, but they're implementing and pushing proprietary technology with their development community," Microsoft product manager David Fester said. "Microsoft has pledged 100 percent standards support for some time. The truth is in the pudding and the products."

    Pot, Kettle Black (netscape, microsoft , standards, name-calling) [com.com]

    Wednesday's Windows Media announcements are specific to XP, said David Fester, general manager of Microsoft's Windows Digital Media division. "These are companies that are doing things specifically around XP," he said. "As you know, our Windows Media effort is broader than just XP."

    Windows Media announced for MAC/Linux/Solaris (not) [com.com]

    "This is unprecedented, but we realized we need to work together [with Netscape] for the common good. We decided we should not propose separate standards for privacy software." David Fester, Microsoft, June 97

    More Outright Lies from David Fester [tprc.org]

    Tell me again why I want to listen to *anything* this man has to say.
    • Re:choice (Score:5, Funny)

      by ZackSchil (560462) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:51PM (#7958967)
      Wait.. what? I would fill up the gas in my car if my sister wasn't a lesbian.
    • Re:choice (Score:5, Informative)

      by cultobill (72845) on Monday January 12 2004, @09:52PM (#7958980)
      What?

      iTunes doesn't require you to have an iPod. It works fine on your computer. And it's the only solution that allows you to take the files you buy from it, unprotect them, and turn them into whatever format you want.

      I know, you'll call me an Apple apologist. Whatever. I guess I could call you a Microsoft apologist and it would make as much sense.
    • Re:choice (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 12 2004, @10:05PM (#7959133)
      I hate to point out the obvious, but I use iTunes and I do not have an iPod and I'm sitting in my living room enjoying beautiful music off my stereo that I got from iTunes. All I have to do is burn a disk. La dee dah. One of the biggest misconceptions is that one needs an iPod to use iTunes. Tain't so.
    • by The Herbaliser (660976) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:08PM (#7959156)
      AAC isn't a proprietary Apple technology, and there are other AAC players available. [ciao.co.uk]
    • correct me if I'm wrong, but you can only listen to iTunes content on an iPod.
      You're only one 'Burn' button away from a DRM free CD you can play anywhere. (which is a good idea from a backup standpoint)
    • Re:Isn't he right? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Kevinv (21462) <kevin AT vanhaaren DOT net> on Monday January 12 2004, @10:02PM (#7959095) Homepage
      Not compeletely. You can only listen to iTunes Music Store protected AAC files on iPods, Windows computers and Macintosh computers.

      iTunes itself allows you to create unprotected MP3 and unprotected AAC from your own music collection and do whatever you want with them.

      I do not believe Microsoft's Windows Media Player for the Mac allows listening to protected WMA files, so in that regard the WMA format is more locked in than AAC (currently).

      Also if you look at Buy.com's music store you'll see that instead of Apple's flat and mild DRM policy (same policy all songs), music company's can restrict you to how often you can copy music to your player and how many times you can play a song and if you can burn it to CD (the ability to do this may be in AAC files, i'm not sure, but it has not been enabled)

      so no, currently the itunes is not as restrictive as Windows Media Player, but the protected AAC's can only be played on iPod players (if Apple gains a large enough share of the online music world -- say 90%, there may be an anti-trust law suit against them for not allowing the songs to be played on non-Apple devices)

      Kevin
    • Re:Isn't he right? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by silentbozo (542534) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:04PM (#7959123) Journal
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can only listen to iTunes content on an iPod.

      You can play DRM-encoded AAC iTunes content on iPods, other iTunes equipped Macs and PCs, burn the content to CD, and stream your AAC library to other Macs/PCs on the local network.

      However, it doesn't matter. You could turn your argument on it's head and state that you can only listen to DRM-WMA content on DRM-WMA devices (and exactly how many WMA devices currently support DRM-locked WMA files?), whereas you can listen to DRM-encoded AAC files on any iPod/HP Music Player/Mini iPod or iTunes equipped Mac or PC.

      Both would still pale in comparison to the number of devices that can support MP3s. Microsoft is pissed because the choices that HP is offering doesn't include their brand of proprietary lock, weakening the chances that WMA will become the new .DOC of the media world.
    • Re:Isn't he right? (Score:5, Informative)

      by NtroP (649992) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:20PM (#7959277)

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can only listen to iTunes content on an iPod.
      OK, Let's see if I can clear this up for you.

      iTunes can handle several different audio codecs. Most of my files are MP3s, but some are AIFFs and some are AAC. That being said, I can sync and listen to ALL my MP3s and AIFF files on ANY player that can understand them. You don't need an iPod to listen to MP3s from iTunes - almost any MP3 player will do.

      iTunes Music Store on the other hand only provides AAC encoded content. You must have a device capable of playing AAC files to play this content - or, you can make a playlist, hit "burn" (you don't even need a CD - there is software that can make a "virtual" CD") and you now have all your purchased content in 128 Bit MP3 format. Yes, one extra step, but easy to do and it's then DRM-Free. I do this so that I can play my purchased music on my MP3-enabled CD player in the car or in my office at work. So the long and short of it is, iTunes content isn't only AAC DRM'd Files.

      Hope that clears it up. Don't listen to the FUD put out by those who seem to feel threatened by it. iTunes is an excellent player/organizer in it's own right and doesn't need an iPod to work.

    • naked FUD? (Score:5, Funny)

      by martin-boundary (547041) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:19PM (#7959263)
      Cripes, when did this happen? I'm out of it for a little bit, and Microsoft becomes a spamming outfit! Naked FUD, Enlarge your CHOICE, end-user license SECRETS, listen to music FROM YOUR HOME...
    • Re:choice? (Score:5, Funny)

      by LostCluster (625375) * on Monday January 12 2004, @10:22PM (#7959298) Homepage
      Microsoft offers choices...

      - Your free web-based e-mail account can end in either msn.com or hotmail.com... your choice!
      - You can browse the web with either Internet Explorer or MSN Explorer... your choice!
      - You can read your e-mail with Outlook Express or Outlook... your choice!
      - You can use Windows XP Home or Windows XP Pro... your choice!
      - You can use WMA files with any music player that has paid the appropriate fees to Microsoft, plenty of choices available in the market!
      - You can get WMA files from any music service that has paid the appropriate fees to Microsoft, plenty of choices available in the market!
    • Re:choice? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by whittrash (693570) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:35PM (#7959398) Journal
      This come from the Iraqi information minister? The Windows people are just shitting their pants because this will mean HP will beat them to market, they will have cooler designs and a better infrastructure in place when the battle for music dominance begins. This is a wedge into their tight little monopoly and they are freaking out. I am sure Apple will find a way to screw this up though.
      • Re:choice? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by xenoandroid (696729) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:27PM (#7959338) Homepage
        How many times must people say this, you can easily convert from AAC, AAC is not Apple owned and is an MPEG standard (any company could add AAC to their player if they care to). iTunes music store is the most stress-free and has the best selection of music, therefore the "lock-in" you experience is what you trade in for not wanting to kick someone in the groin for the inconsistent licensing agreements.

        It's completely moronic when people blame a company that's doing something that other companies never tried (a better codec, less restricting DRM, seamless integration) all while people are rooting against them. If you're going to blame someone, blame the other companies for not supporting AAC in their players, Apple is already working on Windows Media for iPod.
      • Re:choice? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by john82 (68332) on Monday January 12 2004, @10:27PM (#7959346)
        Except that you aren't REQUIRED to use AAC. There's this other format that iPod will use. Maybe you've heard of it.

        It's called MP3.

        So much for vendor lock-in. 'Course, if you really want to use AAC, you could use iPod or this from Nokia [mphone.co.uk] and while we're talking about Nokia, what about that cool new N-Gage [cellular.co.za] . Then again there's this new model from O2 [theregister.co.uk]. And of course, it won't be long before you can buy HP's iPod clone.