NYT Exposes the Identity of Fake Steve Jobs

mattatwork writes "NY Times writer Brad Stone figured out the real identity of Fake Steve Jobs. With classic nick names like 'freetards' and 'beastmaster' Fake Steve captured an audience of 700,000 visitors to the site and around 50 emails a day. According to Daniel Lyons, the senior editor at Forbes magazine who maintained the blog, there is no definite plan for the future of the site. 'Mr. Lyons said he invented the Fake Steve character last year, when a small group of chief executives turned bloggers attracted some media attention. He noticed that they rarely spoke candidly. "I thought, wouldn't it be funny if a C.E.O. kept a blog that really told you what he thought? That was the gist of it." Mr. Lyons says he recalled trying out the voices of several chief executives before settling on the colorful Apple co-founder. He twice tried to relinquish the blog, but started again after being deluged by fans e-mailing to ask why Fake Steve had disappeared.'"

Solved?

[taoman1 (1050536)]

Was this a mystery that just had to be solved?

Re:Solved?

[by Anonymous Coward]

I can just imagine the reporter in full Nancy Drew mode poring over clues.

Break out your magnifying glass kids, we're off to solve the Mystery of The Fake CEO Blogger!

Solved? Or handed on a platter?

[1u3hr (530656)]

I suspect this was more an unveiling than a discovery. Notice in TFA:

In October, Da Capo Press will publish his satirical novel written in the voice of the Fake Steve character, "Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs, a Parody."

He'll be actively courting publicity now.

Actually, it makes a lot of sense...

[Xenographic (557057)]

Dan Lyons was that guy who schilled for SCO, repeating their press releases as if they were news, helping to stalk PJ of Groklaw, creating a blog that seemed to serve little purpose except to give SCO a "source" to cite in its litigation, calling us all fools for thinking SCO had no case, etc.

Finding out that he's been out trolling some more only makes sense. I mean, the guy is one great big douchbag and he loves getting people riled up. Doesn't Forbes want him publishing under his real name any more? I don't blame them. He's like a Dvorak clone who likes to rile anti-SCO people instead of Apple fans.

Re:Bill Gates

[arth1 (260657)]

Yeah, but the Fake Steve Jobs was fake...

And as they say on Ebaum's World

[LameAssTheMity (998266)]

Fake, everyone knows Steve Jobs isn't real.

Link NYT [e-mail]

[by Anonymous Coward]

Mystery solved: 'Fake Steve' blogger comes clean [com.com] See CNET's reprint of the NYT article there.

John Howard: Prime Minister

[Trentus (1017602)]

A few years ago, a friend directed me to http://johnhoward.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]. It's one of the few web pages I've actually laughed out loud at. It's written in a great style.

Re:John Howard: Prime Minister

[by Anonymous Coward]

Who the hell is that?

Re:John Howard: Prime Minister

[dbIII (701233)]

Yes, but when it comes down to it he's not hugely relevant so is ignorable internationally - his government has pretty well been in caretaker mode for the last decade and his foreign policy is "me too". Even a major US newspaper got his name wrong and called him Mike Hunt when he was visiting the USA - possibly misled by an Aussie that was playing a bit of a joke. The last Prime Minister we had that we would expect people to notice is Malcolm Fraser - very tall, face like an Easter Island statue and memorable for running around in a US hotel with no pants on.

Good job, New York Times.

[Scoria (264473)]

Now, if only we could get those investigative journalists of yours to apply their talent where it really makes a difference...

Re:Good job, New York Times.

[Wordsmith (183749)]

Oh please. The NYT does a whole range of things, from fluff to hard-hitting international journalism - from book reviews to government exposes, from quirky coverage of Adult Swim's Star Wars Project to insider political reporting. The diversity of coverage is part of what makes it a strong paper.

That its did this says nothing about the quality of its coverage of other items. You can't look at every use of a resource as wasteful just because it's not devoted to the single most important item of the day; the breadth of coverage is important too.

Re:Good job, New York Times.

[KingSkippus (799657)]

You do know that the New York Times has more than one reporter, right? And that it's possible for them to write stories on silly little things like this and still cover the Taliban, homeless, floods, and government? Oh, and even give us a nifty new crossword every day?

Re:Good job, New York Times.

[vought (160908)]

We have Pakistan (our ally) collaborating with the Taliban [indianexpress.com], there are Over 20 million displaced homeless [npr.org] due to floods in India, and let's not mention the hypocrisy of the government at home.
If The New York Times feels that this is a worthy exercise for their investigative reporters....

Maybe it's the only kind of investigative reporting that they can do these days without being arrested.

Don't scoff - Bush himself went on a rampage after the NYTimes outed his little "go around the courts" wiretapping program.

Re:Good job, New York Times.

[MillionthMonkey (240664)]

Every day people are dying, and we're reading Slashdot.

Well, none of us have real Jobs.

Tragedy

[fishthegeek (943099)]

I feel like a tiny bit of myself has been killed today. I will never experience the same innocent joy that accompanies reading a fake CEO blog again. Damn frigtard reporters.

Next assignment:

[by Anonymous Coward]

The New York Times is now working on the identify of an even more prolific online writer, "Anonymous Coward".

This needs quoting

[eclectro (227083)]

This is from Fake Steve's blog [blogspot.com];

"You put the pieces of the puzzle together. You went through my trash, hacked into my computer, and put listening devices in my home. Now you've ruined the mystery of Fake Steve, robbing thousands of people around the world of their sense of childlike wonder. Hope you feel good about yourself, you mangina."

A better quote

[chebucto (992517)]

From the same post on the blog:

One bright side is that at least I was busted by the Times and not Valleywag. I really, really enjoyed seeing those guys keep guessing wrong. For six months Dr. Evil and Mr. Bigglesworth put their big brains together and couldn't come up with the answer. Guy from the Times did it in a week. So much for the trope about smarty-pants bloggers disrupting old media. Brilliant.

File under "It's funny, laugh"

thanks NYT!

[godawful (84526)]

i'm glad someone killed the child-like wonder FSJ had instilled in my life, next assignment? an exposé on proving santa claus isn't real, just in time for xmas

Secret Diary of Bill Gates

[1u3hr (530656)]

The "Secret Diary of Bill Gates, Aged 40 1/4" was in a similar vein, about 10 years ago. This was written, as the title implies, in the style of Adrian Mole, as a self-important nerd.

Monday, January 15
No. It can't be true! They really are writing about Steve Jobs -- I just saw the latest Wired magazine with an in-depth interview with the Boy Wonder. Why is he a "visionary"? I'm a visionary too. Why don't they call me a "visionary"? I'm tired of being "ruthlessly competitive". This guy got lucky too. I mean, you know, they always say I got lucky when IBM licensed DOS. That wasn't luck, it was skill. I negotiated a great deal from IBM then ran over to Patterson's place and snapped up Q-DOS. That takes *balls*. Jobs has no balls. Jobs is a guy who spends two weeks choosing a washer/dryer. Yes, *two* weeks. For what? Like, $500 or so. The guy has millions. Jobs is a guy who actually cares about his clothes "feeling really soft". What a loser --

The site lasted a year or so. I found an archive of 1997 here. [davesource.com]

The Real Question /.ers Want to Know...

[earthbound kid (859282)]

What ever happened to As Seen On TV [slashdot.org]?

Oy - mod parent up, y'all!

[Penguinisto (415985)]

I guess he's no longer best known for being a SCO supporting paided{sic} shill.

Actually, given who it turned out to be, the motives and biases are rather clear in hindsight. I'm almost willing to bet that Steve Ballmer wasn't among the "other CEO voices" Mr. Lyons tried out...

But then, maybe it was a means for ol' Dan to get out his juvenile side?

I dunno - this is starting to sound too much like a flamebait -ish pack of conspiracy theories. Don't get me wrong, I thought it was funny here and there - but seeing who's behind it makes me wonder if it wasn't just a larger propaganda campaign on Lyons' part.

/P

Re:Best known.

[toxic666 (529648)]

Groklaw

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200708051 95515884 [groklaw.net]

sums it up pretty well.

An "analyst" who supported SCO Group and is suspected as an MS front man. You wonder why there are conspiracy theories about MS being behind SCO Group's actions?

With 20/20 hindsight, it had to be Lyons, MOG or Dildio.

Re:Darn.

[Simon Garlick (104721)]

The thing that blows my mind is that there's an editor out there who can WRITE.