Slashdot Log In
Give iPod Thieves an Unchargeable Brick
Posted by
Zonk
on Fri Jul 27, 2007 03:23 PM
from the this-ones-for-the-guy-that-stole-mine dept.
from the this-ones-for-the-guy-that-stole-mine dept.
Svippy writes "Apple has patented a technology for new generations of iPods that would detect when a user tries to operate the iPod on an unauthorised machine ... and will refuse to charge. Indefinitely. From the article: 'Every portable gadget with a rechargeable battery has a charging circuit that recognises when the external mains charger has been plugged in. It then manages the transfer of current to the battery. Apple's patent suggests that by attaching a "guardian circuit" to the charging circuit, it would be possible to block the charging process. When a device is plugged into an unauthorised computer, software would compare a security code in the device to a code buried in the software in the computer. Apple already employs a similar technology to "pair" iPods to iTunes running on a specific Mac or PC. If the codes do not match, then the guardian circuit could be triggered to prevent any further charging.'"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Give iPod Thieves an Unchargeable Brick
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 338 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
False positives (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:False positives (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://2130706433/ | Last Journal: Thursday July 19, @10:29AM)
This is about making sure that people who buy a second charger have to buy it from Apple, at inflated prices.
Re:False positives (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:False positives (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.datanorth.net/~cuervo/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 04 2007, @05:40AM)
False patent (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday September 09, @05:43PM)
Oh, yeah, Apple, um, good luck with that...
Re:weeee (Score:5, Informative)
B
Re:weeee (Score:4, Funny)
Re:possible solutions (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.themeuge.com/)
Re:weeee (Score:5, Informative)
Bricks anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bricks anyone? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.qsl.net/df5jt)
Very funny indeed. You did follow that link, didn't you?
Quote:
***
3) Finally, and most disturbingly, Jeff was not heard from again. I personally e-mailed him for permission to run his story on ZUG, but after an initial response, I never heard from him again. All of his Web sites have come down, and he is nowhere to be found.
***
It would be unfortunate (Score:5, Insightful)
Why are so many people getting this wrong? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://tron.lir.dk/ | Last Journal: Friday November 02 2001, @02:17PM)
It has nothing to do with the iPod only working with specific, Apple-branded, chargers. That would be stupid.
another idea (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.bagoogly.com/)
Freeze Frame by J Geils Band
or wannabe by the spice girls
or wake me up before you go go by wham
mmmbop by hanson
you know, horrible stuff like that --- i know if i were a thief the idea of horrible music would deter me
Not the only use (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://dexplor.com/)
Dan East
Better to not get it stolen in the first place. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Better to not get it stolen in the first place. (Score:4, Funny)
(http://some.where.else/)
Great... (Score:4, Funny)
Finally a digital device that will go on an energy hunger strike if it doesn't like its connectivity situation.
So, would this make the iPhone the Gandhi of portable devices?
Bad idea (Score:5, Insightful)
Unbricking the iPod when it's connected to an authorized computer would mitigate, but not solve, the problem.
PRM (Score:5, Funny)
iPods and multiple machines (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.metlin.org/ | Last Journal: Friday July 20, @01:58PM)
Now, on top of everything, it's going to refuse to charge unless I show that I am the owner on all three? Or maybe, I can only charge it on one?
Either way, this is only making a bad problem worse.
Bad enough that iTunes has more than once destroyed my music backup because I tried added music from another machine. Now it's also going to not let me use my iPod?
Nice. And here I thought Apple was about usability.
What about non PC charging? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/)
All I want to be able to do is charge my friggin' iPod when I'm away from home. I don't think Apple should be deciding where I can charge my iPod -- what damage to them if I use a different machine to *charge* the damned thing.
I mean, it's not like you can extract songs from an iPod readily. (At least, not such that I've seen). This just sounds like really dumb functionality.
will never happen.... (Score:5, Interesting)
My girlfriend has a car charger, a wall charger, and an iHome which all charge her iPod.
great idea (Score:5, Insightful)
I can see it now... (Score:5, Funny)
Um... (Score:5, Insightful)
Something in this article seems fishy and I don't think we're getting the full story of Apple's intentions, because the whole thing makes zero sense to me.
Make the iPod impossible to update. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.cravenfamily.com/)
You can still charge it.
Got a soldering iron? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://webpages.atlanticbb.net/~ezahurak/ | Last Journal: Tuesday February 26 2002, @07:57PM)
Yeah, it means cracking open the device, but if you've stolen it, there's a good chance you're not going to care all that much about some pry marking on the case.
Apple are wusses (Score:3, Funny)
Anyway like a bunch of people have already said, this is probably going to anger a lot more people than it's going to make happy (as far as consumers go). I for one would rather *not* have my device have a feature like "if you hook this up to the "wrong" machine, it's forever forfeit."
Not to mention this won't act as a deterrent for thieves worth crap.
So my car charger is not authorized? (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 31, @08:33AM)
this is horrible (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.solussd.com/)
Excellent business case (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday June 25 2004, @02:36AM)
1. The device is 'attached' to a particular person's computer(s)
2. The device and user is known to the manufacturer, eg via iTunes
3. As the iPod can be effectively rendered useless if someone else buys or uses it, you can't buy one 2nd hand, so you have to fork out for a new one.
4. Profit!
I suggest buying AAPL immediately!
I will take a moment to remind people (Score:4, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 21 2002, @04:37PM)
Er, Stupid idea? (Score:5, Insightful)