Slashdot Log In
100 Million iPods
Posted by
samzenpus
on Mon Apr 09, 2007 04:27 PM
from the that's-a-lot-of-music dept.
from the that's-a-lot-of-music dept.
prelelat writes "I find it somewhat hard to believe but this story over at PC world, indicates that the iPod has sold over 100 million units. It also asks how many are broken and replaced which makes me believe the number may be more accurate."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Obligatory. (Score:5, Funny)
- CmdrBallmer
Re: 15 Units? (Score:4, Funny)
Comma chameleon, come and go, come and go (Score:1, Troll)
(http://www.exacttarget.com/)
To keep on-topic, my 3G 15GB iPod still works just fine. The battery doesn't last the 8 or so hours it used to (more like 6 now), but it still runs like a champ.
Re:Comma chameleon, come and go, come and go (Score:4, Funny)
Comma problems? (Score:4, Funny)
Well, now I know how to obfusticate any sensitive documentation. Just insert commas where they don't belong and a certain proportion of slashdot readers will waste valuable brain cycles attempting to decipher it. Whereas my loyal minions, having simpler brains, will ignore any and all punctuation marks and will implement my open source doomsday devices first.
Lame. (Score:4, Funny)
(http://faroutshirts.com/)
"Sold" probably includes them all (Score:5, Interesting)
Even if there's a 10% warantee number, that still makes for 90M-or-so real sales. That is not too suprising considering how iconic the ipod is and how much Apple have invested in creating that image.
I wonder what Apple's advertising budget is for ipod? It probably gets to be somewhere around a buck per unit.
Re:"Sold" probably includes them all (Score:5, Insightful)
Many companies run their service centres as a seperate business unit because that's simpler. I don't know if Apple do this, but they might. If they do, then replacement units get sold to the service centres who then charge a service fee back to the ipod business unit. This is a far neater way to handle stock levels etc.
Regardless, I do agree that they have no need to pump up sales numbers. They're doing fine with no embellishment.
Sooo (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday August 20, @04:49PM)
B) Hard to believe? The company is making a statement of fact flat out, and just not including the caveats such as replacement or upgrade purchases.
Slow. News. Day.
Oh, and the actual article (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday August 20, @04:49PM)
A bit of perspective (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://thedailybackground.com/)
Re:A bit more (Score:4, Interesting)
Are you serious?
Let's say the iPod was released in 2001. They've sold 100 million units. But if, as you claim, 50+ million are in stores/warehouses, that means they've sold about 50 million in the 6 years since release.
Apple refresh the iPod lines every 1 or 2 years. This means the sales life-span of a model is 2 years max.
So your argument is that Apple keep SIX YEARS' worth of stock in the supply chain? And that of that stock, 4 years' worth, or about 33 MILLION will never be sold, because a new replacement model will be out by then?
Well, you've convinced me.
Re:A bit of perspective (Score:4, Insightful)
I've been gifted a Shuffle, and I've gifted iPod nanos to two people. And I'd bought a regular iPod which I later sold.
So, technically, I purchased 4 iPods according to Apple. There you go, skewing of stats, right there.
Huh? No, according to Apple, based on what you've said, you've purchased 3 (someone else purchased one and gifted it to you, but there's no way they'd know that it ended up in your hands, so by their count, you've only purchased three, because in fact, you've only purchased three). And how does the fact that you purchased three iPods skew the stats about the number of iPods sold? You purchased three, they count that has having sold three. 3 != 3?
The value of good user interface design... (Score:4, Interesting)
I Don't Love You (Score:5, Funny)
(http://babelfish.alt...%2F%2Fslashdot.jp%2F)
Re:The value of good user interface design... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.schube.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday September 25 2005, @11:49PM)
People love to naysay the dominant market player, which is ironically the one getting trounced in the OS realm. I really do hope their new agreement for higher quality music takes off. I'm going to soon buy a permanent dock to dock my iPod with my high-end home audio system. So the new format will be greatly appreciated and I don't mind paying a few extra $$ for a high-def quality rip of Dark Side of the Moon.
Re:The value of good user interface design... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why dont you pay $10 for the CD and make a lossless rip of it using, say, Apple Lossless for use on your stereo? And then have a 192kbps VBR AAC rip for your iPod when its on the go and you care about quantity rather than too much quality? All without DRM.
Re:The value of good user interface design... (Score:4, Informative)
That's not quite true. http://www.1418hell.com/ [1418hell.com] (Now offline due to bandwidth restrictions). Here's the apple docs on it (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=3
I've also had major problems with Apple Firmware updates on my 60 gb 5G ipod. After updating firmware, I regularly find that Apple has dropped support for a specific video resolution or bit rate (the iPod is ridiculously temperamental with video support), which means half of the videos on my iPod don't work.
Now I don't ever upgrade my firmware; I'm really not missing out on much I guess.
Microsoft can be dethroned (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://ilp303.com/)
This is the reason that Microsoft can be dethroned--when you have good design, you can beat the giants. When you have shitty design and you are a giant, your product doesn't sell (Zune, case in point).
This is why Apple is sending shivers through the phone industry with the iPhone.
I predict that 2008 will be the year of actually easy to use phones, because of the well-designed competition by the iPhone.
Thank you Apple for raising the bar.
Why so hard to believe? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://nekobox.org/)
Apple has done extraordinarily well here with the iPod and is poised to shape the future of digital downloads (software and media) with their iTunes Store.
Probably at least 5M units broken... (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, the real question is whether or not the proportion of lost/broken/damaged/stolen/etc iPods is similar to other devices. After all, do iPods really have a higher failure rate, or is it because there's more of them, you hear more about them?
(And before you start blaming the non-replacable battery - there are few devices other than cellphones, cameras and laptops where having a replacable battery actually is useful - it's likely by the time you need a replacement, the battery isn't even made anymore... Can you get replacement Li-Ion batteries for the many HPaq PDAs out there other than the current model/phone models? Or the multitude of 'superior' mp3 players of at least a couple years vintage?)
Their questions are totally irrelevant... (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmm (Score:5, Interesting)
1 song = 4E6 bytes
Total songs = 2E18 bytes / 4E6 bytes = 5E11 songs
1 song via ITMS = $1
Total cost to fill all ipods = 500 000 000 000 dollars
GDP of New Zealand = 108 520 000 000
Thus, it would take 5E11/1.08E11 = 4.62 years worth of New Zealand's national product to fill all ipods with music.
Wow! That is a lot of music!
Find it hard to believe? (Score:3, Insightful)
The guy that wrote the article sounds extremely bitter... did he design the Zune or something? Waaa waaa how many of those replaced old ipods or were stolen? WHO CARES? The press release is for ipods sold, not ipods currently in use. 100 million sold is amazing, no matter how you slice it.
Not sure why it's so hard to believe. (Score:5, Informative)
Anecdotally, I have gone through three ipods... a 3G which I carelessly dropped on concrete from about 5 feet, and a 5G which replaced the broken 3G, which I use every day. I was also given a nano as a gift, and I use that at the gym, so I don't have to worry about dropping the 5G. Looking around at the gym, I would also estimate 30% or so of the people in my line of sight at any time there are plugged into a nano or shuffle; In addition, ipods are a very common sight on desks during the day at work, too.
I don't think 100 million ipods sold to date is a particularly unbelievable number. If they told me there were 100 million ipods sold, and they're all still alive "in the wild," that would be pretty hard to swallow.
Who gives a shit (Score:2)
(http://web.mac.com/crackedbutter | Last Journal: Monday January 01 2007, @07:57PM)
It doesn't matter how many were replaced. (Score:3, Insightful)
Apple profits from selling the hardware, not from the active userbase, in fact, they benefit from smaller userbase (less loss/load on iTunes) that refreshes its hardware often.
Even if it was one single crazy guy, who bought 100 million iPods, Apple doesn't give a damn.
MciPod (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Friday November 09, @01:36AM)
That's an impressive feat (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.vivaoporto.com/)
Re:That's an impressive feat (Score:4, Insightful)
Perspective (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Sunday August 21 2005, @02:38AM)
Nintendo DS: 39.8 million (total sales)
Gameboy: 69 Million (total sales)
Gameboy Advance: 77 million (total sales)
iPod: 100 million (total sales)
Cellphones: 2,000 million (currently in use)
I think I have a better understanding of why they built the iPhone...
Sold. But to whom? (Score:2)
(http://geeksplosion.blogspot.com/)
Re:Sold. But to whom? (Score:4, Informative)
The rules are roughly: Apple can count an item as sold as soon as it leaves the company, AND Apple can be quite sure that the buyer will pay for it. If Walmart buys 100,000 iPods and has a contract that they have to pay for them no matter whether they sell them to end users or not, then Apple can count them as sold (even if Walmart can't shift them. Apple _has_ sold them). If Walmart buys 100,000 iPods and has a contract that they have to pay for those that they sell on to end users, and can return the others at any time, then Apple can count those as sold that Walmart has sold on.
If Apple sells 100,000 iPods to a seller that signed a contract that forces them to pay, but that seller goes bankrupt and Apple doesn't get the money, and doesn't get the iPods back, then I believe they can be counted as sold, and Apple's loss from bad debt is counted somewhere else in the books. I haven't heard of any such case.
Why is everyone so surprised? (Score:3, Insightful)
My wife and I have 5 between us... (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.rangat.org/rthille | Last Journal: Thursday November 23 2006, @12:20AM)
iPod - 40GB (3/4th gen?)
iPod Mini (1st gen)
iPod Nano (2nd gen)
iPod Shuffle (1st gen)
iPod Shuffle (2nd gen)
I've been tempted to get the 5.5gen iPod, but I think I'll wait for widescreen.
Slashdot editors need to get over their iPod hate (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 04 2004, @09:18PM)
Given that 80 million iPods have been sold in the last two years - wait, Apple said they had sold 10m in early 2005 - so 90 million iPods in the last two years, I'd guess that the vast majority of them are in use (i.e., they work and aren't under the sofa missing) still (even if they were stolen!).
My iPod nano is 20 months old and I use it all the time still.
I bet that over time less than 10 million iPods sold were due to a previous iPod breaking and being out of warranty. Probably less than 5 million. Likely less than 2 million. Apple will sell than many in a couple of weeks, so it's a rather pointless argument anyway.
Anyway, why doesn't this thinking apply to other manufacturers? Sony - 120m or so PS2s for example. Sold == Sold in anybody's book.
Coincidence (Score:5, Funny)
That's a coincidence, I found mine on an Air France flight!
Price Point (Score:2, Informative)
i agree (Score:1)
I might have been #100mil (Score:2)
the most important point to me is..... (Score:1)
MP3 is a terrible format, yes I know a lot of people tell me,"it's alright, I use the highest rate available", but it still sounds like excrement, with nasty high frequency artifacts that make my teeth jangle and destroyed dynamics.
Seriously I was in a nightclub a few weeks ago and they had installed an MP3 based music system and apart from all the high frequency narkiness that was giving me a headache the lack of dynamics made the resultant mix of songs so BORING that even the dedicated clubbers were getting turned off.
Apple on the other hand worked a bit harder on their codec and came up with something that did not destroy the music as much.
As I once wrote before try this test (With thanks to Paul D. Lehrman, of Mix Magazine and a teacher of audio).
take a mono wave file, convert it to both MP3 (any rate you choose), and 'MP4a'(Apples format).
Now convert both of these back to
For a perfect conversion there should be total cancellation,that is, to give an example, if you add the inverted wave file to the original wav file there will be nothing left over.
My experience is that the apple codec will leave a few specks on the graph but nothing more than a few clicks and pops will be audible.
The Mp3 codec will leave you with enough of the song behind that you will be able to recognise the track and even sing along with it.
Paul Lehrman from mix magazine goes into this in more detail and someone else may be kind enough to provide a pointer to the exact article.
But in the meantime here are some references from music industry professionals (not RIAA but the real ones who do the work and love music) :
http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_consumer_conundrum
even students notice the difference :
http://mixonline.com/newmedia/internetaudio/audio
5 were purchased by my household (Score:3, Interesting)
Meh, nothing... (Score:1)
In a dump, who cares? (Score:1)
100 Million iPods (Score:1)
100 Million iPods..... (Score:2)
Stupid article (Score:1)
D'OH (Score:2)
(http://www.lkmc.ch/)
Personally, I've owned two different iPods. One of the original "mechanical wheel" iPods (which I sold - it still works), and an iPod nano (which obviously also still works, it's quite new).
Microsoft has sold over 47 Zunes! (Score:2)
(http://www.scarydevil.com/~peter/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:53PM)
Leave it alone (Score:2)
The accountants added up all the sales and came up with 100 million. What's so hard to believe about that?
You know, President Bush has an iPod, and they released his playlists except for the top-secret podcasts he gets from Jesus. Do you hate America?
Most iPods Are Still Young (Score:2)
the truth is (Score:1)
Re:But What About... (Score:4, Funny)
I have a dream that my iPods will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their case but by the content of their hard drive.
Let music ring.
Re:Note To Apple: Dump The Mac (Score:2)
Also, if Apple sold off the "good bits" of OS X, they would be re-incarnated into a less polished product[s] without the backwards compatibility, and then they would wither and die.
Why dump something growing 30% a year? (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://nekobox.org/)
Especially seeing how a little less than half of their profits each year stem from the Mac. Dumping the Mac would almost automatically require them to dump half their workforce, more or less.
Re:100 iPods sold or created? (Score:1)
If you paid money for all 5 then yes. Warranty replacements are not sales.
As an aside, I had one glitch with my 4G Nano once. Other than that, flawless.
Re:100 iPods sold or created? (Score:2)
My shuffle did die after I yanked it hot from a PC, though...
Re:Importance of the other questions. (Score:1, Insightful)
Only in bitter dreams is there even the slimmest of chances that 95 million iPods do not work. Let's be real here: Apple did a fine job of making an accessible, easy-to-use, attractive portable music player that does a very respectable job of providing the features most users wanted. Good on them.
No need to denigrate them or their players simply because you dislike their "cool" image. Not all hot cheerleaders are mean.
Re:iPod and Jelly (Score:1)
(http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
iPod and Dvorak go together like peanut butter and jelly.......
I'm listening to OTR on mine.
I finally broke down and purchased one when I had several hours of flight to suffer and found listening to radio episodes of Gunsmoke, Jack Benny, Fred Allen, etc. make the time go quite enjoyably. I only wish it had a sleep function so I could listen to music while I fall asleep and shut off after 15 minutes.
Re:Note To Apple: Dump The Mac (Score:1)
Somebody has to create media an Apple wants as much of that pie as they can get.
Hobbyists through to Mega Media Conglomerates Apple wants those dollars.
3% means they are probably doing pretty well at that goal.
Re:~~~100 million~~~ (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.dladventures.com/)
I have bought FOUR 30 gig video ipods in the pat 15 months. Two for Xmas 2006 (gifts); one for myself in the fall of 2006 and still one more for Xmas 2006 (gift).
Now, I'm just one guy. But that's a whole lot of buying from just one guy. And while I'm different - I'm not *that* different. The number of white ear buds on the TTC when I take the bus or subway says to me: 100 million world wide? Entirely possible.
Re:Importance of the other questions. (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do you Apple fanbois constantly make this incorrect assumption that anyone who is anti-Apple is automatically pro-Microsoft?
Personally, I wouldn't be seen dead owning an iPod or a Zune. I have a 2GB £20 (=$35) music player that:
1. Mounts as a USB drive I can read/write files to in both Linux and Windows.
2. Supports MP3 and Ogg - the only two music formats of any importance.
3. Nobody is going to mug me for it.
4. If I leave it on a plane or in a taxi, it's no great loss.
In my 45 years on this earth, I have never found a good reason to own an Apple product - and since I'm now far too old to worry about making fashion statements, I probably never will either...
Re:~~~100 million~~~ (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://appleasiseeit.com/)
Re:But What About... (Score:1, Funny)