Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Wal-Mart Leaks Zune Price

Posted by kdawson on Thu Sep 21, 2006 09:13 AM
from the making-microsoft-scramble dept.
nieske writes, "Engadget reports that Wal-Mart accidentally published online the intended price of the Microsoft Zune; the iPod rival would apparently retail for $284. The price was quickly pulled from the Wal-Mart site. Reports say that Microsoft was flustered when Apple dropped the price for the iPod 30 GB, previously $299, to $249. BetaNews states that 'undercutting the iPod is a major goal of Microsoft's upcoming effort.' Will Microsoft respond to Apple with another price drop?"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] News: Microsoft Launches the Zune 472 comments
Doug-W writes to mention an Engadget post about Microsoft's launch of the Zune. From the article: "Not a lot of surprises in the specs department, but they've confirmed the basics we've known for a while, like WiFi, 30GB of HDD, built-in FM, a 3-inch screen and the basic music, pictures and video playback. They also finally let slip the screen res -- an unsurprising QVGA -- and some better news on the codec front: the Zune supports h.264, MP3, AAC and WMA. As for ballyhoo, wireless Zune-to-Zune sharing is where the real action is at, and it works pretty much like we've been hearing: you can share a full-length track with a friend, and they've got three times to listen to it over a three day period, after which they can flag the song for purchase on the Zune Marketplace -- unless they're an unlimited 'Zune Pass' subscriber, of course."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by RootWind (993172) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:16AM (#16152803)
    • by rbarreira (836272) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:19AM (#16152824) Homepage
      That would be great, but I wouldn't trust a sentence starting with "One of our moles on the inside told us...".
    • by tb3 (313150) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:57AM (#16153063) Homepage
      Is this dumping?

      I'm serious. With their huge cash reserves, Microsoft could enter the market in toilet seats tomorrow, price them at 99 cents, drive everyone else out of business, and drive up the price to $10,000 a seat.

      We've already seen them put Netscape out of business by giving away the browser, so can Apple (or any other manufacturer) cry 'foul' and accuse Microsoft of dumping? What are the laws in this situation?
      • by rbarreira (836272) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:59AM (#16153076) Homepage
        Are freeware writers also dumpers? Do they start being dumpers if they later start charging for their software? Mmmmm...
      • by rackhamh (217889) on Thursday September 21 2006, @11:16AM (#16153728)
        Is this dumping?

        I'm serious. With their huge cash reserves, Microsoft could enter the market in toilet seats tomorrow, price them at 99 cents, drive everyone else out of business, and drive up the price to $10,000 a seat.

        We've already seen them put Netscape out of business by giving away the browser, so can Apple (or any other manufacturer) cry 'foul' and accuse Microsoft of dumping? What are the laws in this situation?


        Yes, and we all know how Microsoft ran up the price of Internet Explorer once Netscape was out of the picture...
        • by ookaze (227977) <ookazeNO@SPAMmail.ookaze.fr> on Thursday September 21 2006, @11:45AM (#16153994) Homepage
          Yes, and we all know how Microsoft ran up the price of Internet Explorer once Netscape was out of the picture...

          Yes we know, and for those skeptical people out there, here it is : they ran up the price by not paying anymore people on improving Internet Explorer. Which means that before, the price of Windows included the cost of the dev team on IE. After Netscape was out of the picture, the price of Windows didn't include that cost anymore, but was still the same.
      • by Garabito (720521) on Thursday September 21 2006, @12:05PM (#16154163)
        I'm serious. With their huge cash reserves, Microsoft could enter the market in toilet seats tomorrow, price them at 99 cents, drive everyone else out of business, and drive up the price to $10,000 a seat.

        It would give a new meaning to "per-seat license"

  • Not true (Score:5, Informative)

    by rbarreira (836272) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:17AM (#16152806) Homepage
    David Caulton, who works on the Zune at Microsoft, has already said [zunester.com] (more than once) in his blog:

    A commenter mentioned that they'd "read" that Zune would cost more than the 30GB iPod. I can only say: Don't believe everything you read. I can't specifically talk about price, but I can say that Zune won't be undercut on price by iPod.

    And:

    I can't say more than what I've said, but the statements "The iPod 30GB costs $249" and "Zune won't be undercut on price" are pretty clear on that point ;)
    • Re:Not true (Score:5, Informative)

      by truthsearch (249536) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:54AM (#16153035) Homepage Journal
      The problem for MS is they can't stand to lose too much on the sale of each Zune. While sellling the xbox at a loss they recover (somewhat) in the sale of games. They don't have a profitable music service which will compensate for losses on the Zune. Again they'll take a huge loss to get into a new market. But with the Zune they have no way to recover costs later unless they eventually raise the price.
            • Re:Not true (Score:5, Insightful)

              by tb3 (313150) on Thursday September 21 2006, @10:24AM (#16153262) Homepage
              No, because Apple didn't have any online music sales before they launched the iPod. Then they did iTMS, and it worked.

              Microsoft, on the other hand, has tried numerous times to sell music online, and failed each time. That's their track record. What part of that is so hard to grasp?
  • by Secrity (742221) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:18AM (#16152819)
    It seems that the Zune has a use after all, as a method to get Apple to reduce it's prices on the iPod.
      • by eclectic4 (665330) on Thursday September 21 2006, @10:21AM (#16153237)
        "We know the stories about Apple (ab)using cheap labour to maintain the iPod's profitability at the moment"

        Trolly troll. *sigh* I'll feed you...

        Microsoft will also be (ab)using cheap labour to maintain profitability, it's how business is done. The shirt you are wearing, the computer you are typing on, etc... were all made using cheap foriegn labour. Apple voluntarily investigated the accusations, hired a third party to oversee, and has since been shown to be largely false. If Apple "abuses" anything, it's cornering the market on components

        "Microsoft may be using their position to deliberately push Apple into a crisis."

        Actually, it seems Apple dropping their prices has actually pushed Microsoft into a "crisis". Apple holds 75% of the digital music playing market, and it accounts for about 40% of their profits (all other coming from Mac and software sales). I'm not sure you know what you are talking about.
  • It's doomed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by clickclickdrone (964164) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:21AM (#16152838) Homepage
    Let's be honest here.
    Ipod is synonamous with MP3 player now. Even grannies going to the shops for their grandchildren will ask for an iPod by name. We say podcast, podcasting. I can't see people Zunecasting. Unless the Zune offers something substantially better or a great and highly compelling new feature (Actually, I've just thought of one, maybe I should copyright it right now..) no-one else has thought of then it's just not going to sell. The only hope MS have is to back it up with an extremely cheap song purchase system but I can't see them doing that without oodles of DRM involved.
    • Re:It's doomed (Score:5, Insightful)

      by _xeno_ (155264) on Thursday September 21 2006, @10:04AM (#16153111) Homepage Journal

      One major killer feature of the iPod are iPod accessories. If Microsoft wants to compete with the iPod, they'll need to be completely compatible with it.

      I have an iPod adapter for my car radio. I hook my iPod up to it and can play directly through the radio. This isn't one of those little "FM radio car adapters" either. It puts the iPod into "control mode" or whatever they call it, and can change playlists and move through the playlist directly though the radio.

      This is good, because the radio is designed to be easy to control from the driver's seat without looking at it. The most used buttons (skip song, volume) are shaped to be easy to tell by touch and are positioned to be within easy reach.

      As far as I know, there is no adapter kit for my radio for any other MP3 player on the market. Only one for the iPod.

      If Microsoft wants to compete with the iPod, the Zune needs to be able to support the accessory market. The iPod may not be the greatest MP3 player ever created, but it has the accessory market, and that provides a lot of value that Microsoft will be missing.

  • Sexy sells (Score:5, Funny)

    by Rik Sweeney (471717) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:28AM (#16152875) Homepage
    Once again on the price, you need to make a product sexy to sell it. The dancing silhouette with the white headphones sold the iPod because it looked good.

    So Microsoft, I propose you do this:

    A dancing Ballmer silhouette.

    My pulse is rising already just thinking about it.
    • by Lumpy (12016) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:36AM (#16152929) Homepage
      And can you imagine the DRM nightmare that is going to be on that MSFT device? I have clients all the time needing help moving music they ripped on mediaplayer to a new machine. they will not play because they did not set the "dont encumber my music with drm dammit" flag in the advanced settings hidden in mediaplayer. so I haveto explain to them what DRM is and they still do not understand.

      The other biggest failure of the Microsoft device will be that I dont care what service they couple with, iTunes has way more music selection on it that anything Microsoft can come up with.

      I dont love the iPod, I'm a non drm kind of guy with my iRivers... but microsoft is not known for open and easy to use.
    • by Speare (84249) on Thursday September 21 2006, @09:44AM (#16152984) Homepage
      iPod is "the" MP3 player to the masses and the only thing that will convince them otherwise is price.
      Yeah, because that really makes the Keds Title Bout(tm) sneakers a household name and is a license to print money, while the Nike Air Jordan(tm) line languishes in obscurity and financial ruin.
    • by MightyYar (622222) on Thursday September 21 2006, @10:00AM (#16153086)

      They have to be careful. If it is cheaper than the iPod, that could add to it's image of being a knockoff. It's like wine. People look at all of the bottles on the shelf and don't have any idea what the difference is, but their pretty sure that the $40 bottle is better than the $6 bottle, even though that isn't really true at all. Put yourself at best buy. The 30GB iPod (which you've heard of and seen before) is $249 and this Zune thing is $229. You quickly scan the specs, see that they are about the same, and figure that this Zune thing must just be a cheap knockoff. On the other hand, if it were $259, you might ask a salesperson what the difference is.

      All of this is moot anyway - they went after the wrong market, IMO. The most popular iPod is the tiny little Nano. Unless they were trying to create a niche product, I'm not sure why they didn't go after the biggest market.

      Who runs MS, anyway? Who thought it was a great idea to compete with their licensees? And then against Apple's iPod, where all others have failed? If I was a shareholder I'd be furious. If I were a licensee I'd be furious. If iPod sales ever go flat (don't they have to at some point?), Apple might get a nice reception to an offer to license FairPlay now... a real "plays for sure".

    • by snowwrestler (896305) on Thursday September 21 2006, @10:29AM (#16153297)
      The product it is leading is Vista.

      In the 1990's Microsoft spent thousands of man-hours creating a pen operating system that died on the vine. It was a pure cost to the company, no profit. But the key point is that it died AFTER the GO Penpoint operating system died. Martin Eller, one of the Microsoft staff involved, even has a quote in his book [amazon.com]:

      "This wasn't a thing about making money. This was all about 'block that kick.""

      Apple makes money selling iPods, but the big play for them is the iPod halo effect to sell more Macs. Macs (and Mac software) are much more profitable than an iPod. The release of Vista, with all its associated angst, represents a big opportunity for Apple. Microsoft will fight that halo effect with everything they've got, even if they have to lost money on every single Zune. They make their money from Windows, and this is all about protecting the Microsoft market (and mind) share.