Slashdot Log In
Repercussions of Reporting on Apple 'Sweatshops'
Posted by
Zonk
on Sat Aug 26, 2006 02:53 PM
from the hard-news dept.
from the hard-news dept.
PRC Banker writes "Following the media attention over Apple using 'sweatshop' tactics to manufacture iPods, facts were disseminated making things seem not as bad as first reported. However, recent developments suggest that 'Apple Computer's iPod supplier FoxConn has decided to sue the media for mis-reporting on working conditions in their factories. Rather than sue the British tabloids, FoxConn sues a Shanghai newspaper. The reporter has a translated version of his personal experience and thoughts.' Powerful Chinese company threatens local media. Worrying indeed, especially given this company's track record. The president of Foxconn is the richest man in Taiwan, and the company has attempted to use coercion in the past."
Related Stories
[+]
Apple Responds to Labor Accusations 58 comments
jlaxson writes "Back in June, a number of accusations were leveled at Apple regarding labor practices in its overseas manufacturing and assembly plants. At the time, Apple denied the allegations and said that it would launch an investigation. Today, the results of the investigation were released. From the report: 'We found the supplier to be in compliance in the majority of the areas audited. However, we did find violations to our Code of Conduct, as well as other areas for improvement that we are working with the supplier to address. What follows is a summary of what we've learned, what's already being done in response, and our commitment to future diligence and action.'"
[+]
Apple Admits to Occasional Excessive Work Hours 362 comments
rev_media writes "After Apple's release of a report on the labor conditions in their Chinese factories, many took issue with the deliberately vague wording used in the statement. The BBC is now reporting that Apple has admitted to 'excessive' working hours in some locations, and they would be ensuring that a 'normal' 60-hour work week will be adhered to from now on." From that article: "'We found no instances of forced overtime and employees confirmed in interviews that they could decline overtime requests without penalty,' said Apple in a statement. The firm said there were 'overtime limit exceptions in unusual circumstances' and that it supported a healthy work-life balance. But it did not specify what the triggers for 'unusual circumstances' were and what upper limit it set on working hours. Mr Kuczkiewicz said Apple had not asked workers what they preferred - a decent wage or minimum wage and overtime."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
No worries. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:No worries. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Transilvania is rumoured more appropriate for employee holidays, but it is in northern Romania (though Hungary claims Romania has annexed it unlawfully after WW-I).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
not richest (not even in the Eastern world) (Score:3, Informative)
http [forbes.com]
Damning Comments About Foxconn by "Businessweek" (Score:2)
Foxconn vs. Apple vs. Dell (Score:5, Informative)
Does this mean that corporate america is funding political terrorists?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sueing for libel doesnt exactly count. (valid claim or not)
Da Trut (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Try telling that to china!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This is a common trend in China (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Parent NOT a troll (Score:2)
ANY Google News search with terms like, say, "china company defamation" will turn up dozens of stories with this subtext.
China is writing its legal system e
Boo Hoo (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
When bad things happen to the press it's a step forward for everyone getting the full story on what's going on instead of just the bits that feed the reporter's biases (even if the reporter has to make them up). T
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think almost all newspapers will go out of business in the next 15 years either way.
Newspapers will be even less likely to report on anything that might piss anyone off.
Maybe they
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
And your evidence for this is
It doesn't really mat
Re: (Score:2)
Or... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Or possibly they were aware that the British gutter press have some seriously heavyweight libel lawyers on their side.
Except for the Private Eye, of course, which can't ever get hold o
Price, Profit, Stock (Score:3, Insightful)
So mostly we benefit from these sweat shops. The low income have an opportunity to buy products. Everyone who has investment feels rich because companies can keep costs low, so the stock market isup and investors will buy more expensive things, like houses. People with houses feels better off than they are because they can leverage paper gains into real cash. The economy appears to be doing better than it is because in addition to the fake house cash, we also get loans from Asia so that we can afford to pay them for manufacturing in their swear shops.
But at the end of the day, it is the average persons desire for cheap stuff that drives the cycle. I wonder if Apple produced the 68K Powerbooks in sweatshops? I wonder if Dell could survive without sweatshops. Would we tolerate, would the american economy survive, the lack of sweat shops?
I certainly would want Apple to have a bit more dignity than say, Nike, but I don't hold my breath. As everyone says, Apples are too expensive, and the cost must come down. But think of this. I saw a documentary last year in which a european cell phone manufacturer audited their asian manufacturing facility. Overall it was not terrible. Many safety issues, but not unlike what one would see in the US. Most girls, cramped housing, but again not unlike the way young people live in the US. These workers were there earning a living and saving money, which, if you believe that a hard days work imbues dignity, could be a good thing. One interesting thing was that since the employees were living in company dorm, the company was officially much more responsible for their workers, like being liable if a girl got pregnant.
Which is simply to say that the simplifications made by most are simply useless. I believe we are in much more trouble than most will admit, and the solutions will require much broader adjustments in behavior, which will either be done voluntarily or by necessity. While much of this simplification is done to make it accessible to the common person, and the bias may often be unintentional, the fact that so often the blame lies elsewhere than the writer seem disingenuous.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sounds like an oxymoron. Everybody benefits from the sweatshops except the sweatshop workers. Same apply to slavery.
"would the american economy survive, the lack of sweat shops?"
That's not the right question to
Re: (Score:2)
On a similar note, would the Chinese economy survive the lack of sweat shops?
Manufacturing costs versus retail prices (Score:3, Insightful)
As everyone says, Apples are too expensive, and the cost must come down.
Branded products do not cost a lot to buy, yet have to be made astonishlingly cheaply, because they are better. They cost a lot, and have to be made cheaply, because much more mone
Gosh Darn! Why can't we all be Middle Class? (Score:5, Insightful)
Before you mod me flamebait please realize that no one here has attempted to define what a "sweatshop" is,
or how these jobs compare to others in the Chinese economy.
I own a company that manufactures in China. We pay well above average, and there is always (and when I say always I mean 24/7)
a line of people at the gate looking for work.
None of this changes the fact that most people on this board would call the factory a sweatshop, because the hours are long,
the pay is low by US Standards and the working conditions are below ours in America.
But we're not talking about the US. We're talking about the entire rest of the world which is poorer than we are.
Yes, we have a moral obligation to provide clean, safe working conditions. But we do not have an obligation to elevate those
we employ abroad to US standards of living. And to wealthy Americans (if you're reading this you are comparitively wealthy)
those standards would seem terrifying.
Right now you are sitting in front of a computer surrounded by the products of cheap (and arguably exploitative) labor. Everything you own. Everything
you've eaten today. Everything you're wearing.
By what amazing gift of self-denial do people here condemn the system which makes them so wealthy?
The difference between American capitalists and those who would condemn them that the latter make weak protestations as they consume with the same gusto.
Flame away kids.
Re:Gosh Darn! Why can't we all be Middle Class? (Score:5, Insightful)
To me this proves that the excuse to exploit people is to make more money and is based on greed. THe middle class is suffering while the upper middle class is getting rich and the gap is widening. Gas prices and rent more than doubled in 3 or 4 years yet our salaries have not and more and more factories are closing and heading to China for cheap labor.
Money trickles back with demand side economics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Gosh Darn! Why can't we all be Middle Class? (Score:5, Insightful)
And yes, it is hard to introduce worker's rights into an anti-worker environment. However, you don't have to have your shop in China. You could set up shop somewhere else, where the laws allow you to respect the workers. Don't blame the consumer when you haven't even tried everything you can to solve the problem.
Now hold on there... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You are right on the money, pal. I would also elaborate more, but then the REAL flame will start.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Try pulling your head out of your ass long enough to read _The Jungle_ by Upton Sinclair. Then follow i
Just sell two versions of the ipod (Score:4, Funny)
Folks who don't want to support "sweatshops" can buy the "made in USA" version (for around $900 probably), and others can buy the $300 (sweatshop) version.
And they should make it visually easy to distinguish which version you have just by looking at it (just to keep us all honest).
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, you ment illegals, on yea, $900 for the illegals easy, but then the business owner will mark it up, so you're right back to $3,00
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
One of these days the practice of moving manufacturing to China and other countries will not depend on being big enough to do it efficiently. That is when all these artificial margins these companies (like Apple) are getting will instantly shrink a
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
A generally accurate summation, but I would suggest longer, say as much as ten years.
As I currentl
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Who have they tried to "destroy"?
How do they lie in there advertising?
In my experience, they have always had good cu
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty poor troll, although the lack of any real facts is good.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And we all know that Microsoft has never ever screwed people over.
Er, who mentioned Microsoft? I guess your point is that if one can find someone worse than Apple, then Apple must be all right.
But since you bring up Microsoft, at least MS doesn't sue
Re:Yet more evidence QWZX (Score:4, Insightful)
First, "updates" like Jaguar, Panther, and Tiger are not "minor". They are "major upgrades". They introduce new features. Jaguar introduced bayesian filtering, Quartz Extreme, system-wide accessible Address Book, Bonjour (né Rendezvous), iChat, Inkwell, CUPS, etc., etc. Panther introduced Exposé, Fast User Switching, FileVault, iChat video-conferencing, Font Book, system-wide faxing, etc., etc. Tiger introduced Jaguar, Spotlight, Automator, VoiceOver, RSS in Safari, etc., etc. Leopard is going to introduce Time Machine, Spaces, new versions of Front Row and Photo Booth, system-wide To Do service, etc., etc. Are you really calling these MINOR updates?
Let's see, in contrast, what are Microsoft's service packs? Pure bug fixes. No, the addition of a firewall and additional security aren't new features -- they're there because people were getting fed up with the viruses and worms that were (and still are) attacking Windows. That's bug fixing. Windows XP SP1 and SP2 are comparable to incremental updates like 10.4 --> 10.4.1, or 10.3.8 --> 10.3.9, not major updates like 10.3 --> 10.4 which Apple charges for.
Then you say that MS doesn't make bullshit claims in their advertising. That's a good one! Let's just take their latest "people_ready" advertising. If Windows were really "people_ready", then it wouldn't have all the viruses and trojans plaguing the platform.
Then you say, in an off-hand comment, that Apple gives discounts to schools to cynically "lock them in" as future customers. That's another good one! Microsoft doesn't offer any discounts to schools whatsoever? (Bullshit!) If you want to talk about cynical lock-ins, look at Microsoft's class-action settlements in California, where they attempted to foist Windows software on the claimants rather than giving them money. And that's not cynically locking people in? You've got a really short memory, it seems.
As for whether MS or Apple are great companies for which to work, I can't really comment on that because I've never worked for either. But I doubt you have either.
So let's tally up the points. 4 bullshit arguments. Oh.. *sniff* do you smell that? Oh, yes, I know that smell -- it's a Windows troll!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
See how that works? You sleep better by trusting people to live their own lives and make their own decisions
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But among the choices he does have, I trust him to make the best one. He'll do a better job than you or me at choosing, because he has more information than we do about his life.