Slashdot Log In
Final Version of OpenOffice.org for Mac OS X Released
Posted by
pudge
on Mon Jun 23, 2003 07:15 PM
from the bye-bye-microsoft dept.
from the bye-bye-microsoft dept.
Ant writes "After two years of work, OpenOffice.org for Mac OS X (X11) is golden master and ready for immediate download by all Mac OS X users. This release marks a major milestone. It uses the Unix standard X Window and takes advantage of the immense wealth of open source material. To name but one feature, fonts are anti-aliased, making
documents look smooth and clean and wholly professional. If you use Mac OS X there is no reason to wait. This will address your needs. And, as with all in the OpenOffice.org 1.0 family, this free
release reads and writes Microsoft Office documents and works freely in heterogeneous environments where one might find Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X machines working side by side. The next step is to finish the Aqua version."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Final Version of OpenOffice.org for Mac OS X Released
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 57 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
This will address your needs. (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Thursday April 21 2005, @12:15PM)
woohoo (Score:1)
(http://www.e-trolley.de/)
I'm using my Mac only for web compatibility tests, but it's good to see that M$ gets more and more under pressure
Selling points? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Selling points? (Score:4, Informative)
However, I wasn't able to use the last beta for my work, simply because it didn't support the number of features that I required for working e.g. version tracking, embedded tables, full bullet point customisation, spacing between bullets etc. It has some of these, but doesn't pplay the same way as office, and in this company I can get away with using a Mac, but for presentation purposes, I need to play the same unfortunately.
If there was one thing I didn't like which I couldn't forgive it for was that you had to set all documents the same size - at least - I couldn't find a way to set them differently.
Still. having said that I have downloaded this latest version, and will again see how well it works. The IT guys want to get rid of Office (purely for the licensing), and are waiting for OO to be possible as a replacement..
What about native aqua? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://unixbeard.blogspot.com/)
Re:What about native aqua? (Score:5, Interesting)
Unfortunately... (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:Unfortunately... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://theravensnest.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 27, @07:07AM)
-
The first is to get the whole thing to compile and work under X11 on OS X as it would on any other *NIX. This is the one that was released today.
- The next stage is to replace the X11 code with native Quartz code. It will still feel the same, probably look the same (although they may introduce some more Aqua-like graphics at this point) but it will be a native OS X / Quartz app, with no need for X11.
- The final stage (and I'm really hoping that Apple will get involved at this stage and bundle the resulting office suite with the OS as iOffice, or something) is to redo all of the menus, dialogs etc. so that they look just like a real OS X app. Once this is done (The roadmap [openoffice.org] says Q2 2004) then it should be a competitive office suite on the Mac.
Hopefully now that the OOo OS X team has a working release build they will be able to keep it synchronised with the main trunk.Someone with the dev release of Panther respond! (Score:3, Interesting)
The key here is that with the (development) release of Panther [apple.com], with integrated X11 [apple.com] client released (currently, X11 is Beta 3), will Open Office also enjoy an integrated clipboard, new Font Book [apple.com], and other (as yet to be named by this author) features that limit the adoption of said orphan (huh?) office suite?
If someone attending WWDC who was given the developer release of panther (and high quality, brushed metal, $129 retail value kaleidoscope [apple.com]) would let us know ASAP, "that would be great".
Office Space, the poor man's lite beer
Well good (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Sunday January 11 2004, @03:55AM)
The Day of the Apple? (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~jfzc100/)
Whoa! In the last 24 hours:
Damn cool. This is one of those days when I feel especially proud to be a Mac user.
which is better (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday April 09 2003, @05:06PM)
Unfortunately... (Score:1, Insightful)
I need to print (Score:3, Insightful)
However, I'm not sure that I can consider the MacOSX port of OpenOffice as "usable" until it has the capacity to -print- the documents I create in it.
An Aqua/Cocoa port would be great, but right now, I just want full functionality.
I use it full time with Windows (Score:1)
I decided to use OpenOffice and its gotten better and better with each version. It is now up to 1.1 beta 2 on the Windows side, so the Mac version has a little catching up to do. It is excellent, although it has so many features that it is a bit of overkill for my purposes (read: bloat). It is a very powerful, full-featured office suite.
My only real complaint is the aesthetics, but then that applies to a lot of Windows software. The first thing I do when I do a fresh install of a new version is delete a number of the toolbar buttons and alter the color scheme. I am certain that they will address the appearance on the Mac side. Oh, and OpenOffice doesn't have the most elegant user-interface around. Hopefully they will work on that for the Mac version as well.
I will be buying one of the new G5 Macs in August (woohoo!) and look forward to loading up OpenOffice and following its Aquafication.
Getzen
after years (Score:3, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday May 16 2007, @12:43PM)
OO 103 (Score:2)
Re:Why not just pirate MS Office? (Score:2)
(http://www.seinman.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 04 2003, @04:08PM)
Re:screenshots (Score:1)
(http://www.theapt.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday August 19 2003, @11:58AM)