Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

MacAddict Tracks Down eBay Scam Artist

Posted by pudge on Thu Dec 12, 2002 04:16 PM
from the ha-ha dept.
OS24Ever writes "A future high school history teacher, Jason Eric Smith, sold an 867MHz PowerBook G4 on eBay right before finals. He found out the hard way that people are out there to rip you off, and he went to great lengths to catch this guy with the help of Mac heads everywhere. A great read and agreat way for us little guys to get back at these scammers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • something's rotten by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:18PM
    • Re:something's rotten by Oliver Wendell Jones (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:33PM
      • Re:something's rotten (Score:5, Informative)

        by ShdwStkr (454413) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:41PM (#4875044)
        No.

        From FedEx's COD Policy (here [fedex.com])

        quote

        D. Checks (including cashier's, official, certified, business and personal checks) and money orders for the C.O.D. Amount will be collected at the shipper's sole risk, including, but not limited to, all risk of nonpayment, fraud and forgery. FedEx has no liability with respect to any such instrument.

        end quote.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:something's rotten by Oliver Wendell Jones (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:05PM
          • Re:something's rotten (Score:4, Informative)

            by derch (184205) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:55PM (#4875769)
            The article's slashdotted, so I'm replying under the assumption the fake certified funds looks legit on first glance.

            First, it's a question of reasonably expectations. If the Fedex guy accepted your "Sertifyed Chek," you'd probably have a case of incompetance against the delivery man.

            On the other hand, if it looks like certified check, what do you really expect Fedex to do? To verify that it was valid, you'd have to get the funds and then call the issuer before handing over the package. That's going to add several minutes per COD package. In the case of some businesses, Fedex would have to schedule 15 - 45 minutes for delivery.

            I worked for a company that was burned by a fake cashier's check once. The check looked real. Our bank accepted the check without problems. It wasn't till several days later that the bank found out it was a fake. In our case, the receiver had called his Fedex station and asked them to hold the package at the station, and he picked it up there. The address he had given us was actually a vacant lot.

            Essentially, the carrier acts as your agent when collecting the funds. It'd be the same as if someone walked up to the counter and passed you a bad cashier's check or counterfiet money.
            [ Parent ]
        • Re:something's rotten by Joe5678 (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:39PM
      • Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @01:16PM
    • by Ron Bennett (14590) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:35PM (#4875616) Homepage
      The check *appeared* to clear. Many people figure that once the deposited funds are made available in their account - typically one or two business days, that the money is theirs...

      The problem is that a deposited check, etc can be canceled or not honored for upwards of 10 business days. So for one to be virtually sure that a check, etc is "good", they need to wait at least 10 business days (2+ weeks)...most folks don't wait that long, but they should or they run the risk of being scammed.

      Also, even if the check itself is real (lets not even get into forged cashier checks, etc - even a well seasoned banker would have difficulty detecting some forgeries), the account it's associated with may not be and/or lacking any funds.

      Bottom line is that waiting for clearing is critical...below is my understanding/experience with these things...not the gospel...

      Common payment methods and clearing/dispute time frames:

      Wire: Same day and very safe...they're not without risk though, but problems are rare. Some places that accept wires for payment impose a two day waiting period.

      Check: 10 business days for personal/business checks. Cashier checks, etc have much shorter clearing times - BUT that assumes they're real...if unsure/concerned, then one should wait 10 business days as with personal checks.

      Money Order: At least 10 business days if forged. It's best to wait, then be sorry if unsure.

      Direct deposit (ACH): 2 business days. Can be reversed/disputed for upwards of 60 days.

      Credit Card: Varies on circumstances and issurer, but can be reversed for upwards of six months later.

      The law and procedures are very complicated and full of exceptions, etc...the bank, acting an agent, must make deposited funds available within a short period time as dictated by law/banking procedures...but the point is one should NOT assume just because their bank says funds are available that the funds are truly theirs...because they may not be :-(

      Ron Bennett
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:something's rotten by lemkebeth (Score:2) Saturday December 14 2002, @01:30AM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:20PM
  • My Favorite quote is..... (Score:5, Funny)

    by neurostar (578917) <neurostar AT privon DOT com> on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:22PM (#4874795) Homepage

    "That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails."

    neurostar
  • Scam this! by Dental Plan (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:23PM
  • Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:24PM
  • A smart mob / posse? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by certron (57841) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:25PM (#4874829)
    I think this is interesting for the sole fact that a whole lot of people who owe no direct kinship to each other elected to cooperate for a common cause.

    I was listening to a presentation about different pagan holidays, and one component of one of the rituals was to honor / remember your ancestors. What made me remember this was that the presenter said that the ancestors didn't have to be biological, instead could be cultural, intellectual, or spiritual ancestors.

    In this case, it seems that these 'artificial' families are willing to stick together and cooperate on a common goal, even if they themselves will not directly benefit. I suppose this is just a regular community, with enough people in it that a few would be motivated to assist. Then again, I could just be amazed by my own insight, marvelling at a fact that others have known for ages, and so think that I am smarter than I actually am. :-)

  • I sell things on Ebay as well (usually old games that I'm done with) - and I don't do COD. Paypal - sure. Checks and money orders, but I wait until they clear before they ship.

    I know we should be more trusting of people, but I've become convinced that 20% of the population is made of Assholes that can be trusted only as far as they can be shot.

    Still, I have to admire his spirit tracking the guy down - if nothing else, that's one less asshole to worry about. Only 1 billion to go!
  • Good read but by Mothra the III (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:25PM
  • The importance of a 'P' (Score:5, Funny)

    by Mr Guy (547690) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:25PM (#4874846) Journal
    If he was a spammer [slashdot.org] and not a scammer, he could have just posted it here and had the guy in hours.
  • You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by EllisDees (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:27PM
  • This is excellent news by TerryAtWork (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:28PM
  • Beatles tune... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Vaughn Anderson (581869) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:28PM (#4874877)
    new Beatles tune mp3... only available K**Za

    "I Catch Counterfeiters with a Little Help from my Friends" ...who just happen to be Addicts... go figure..

  • It was... (Score:5, Funny)

    by PDHoss (141657) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:28PM (#4874878)
    like, a really good 867MHz PowerBook G4. ... ... ... ... bummer.
    • More like... by gtaluvit (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:12PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • here goes (Score:5, Informative)

    by mao che minh (611166) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:28PM (#4874879) Journal

    Mac Addicts to the Rescue

    or

    How I Caught a Counterfeiter with a Little Help from my Friends

    a true story by Jason Eric Smith

    Check out the Forum

    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later. the names of the innocent have been changed, the names of the guilty though...

    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive. Since then, I've always had to keep up, first it was the SE, then the IIsi, the Powerbook 140, and from there on, more Macs than you can shake a stick at (I missed the Mac TV). I usually keep my Mac for about 6 months, and then resell it and move up. I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    Since I went back to being a student again, I've been selling Macs more regularly, picking up good deals on used Macs locally and then reselling on eBay. I've been doing this for about two years now, its relatively easy, takes about an extra hour of my day, and usually pays the rent. In November when the new Powerbooks came out I decided I was going to buy one for myself, to keep, an early Christmas present that would come in handy for taking notes in class and finishing up a presentation I needed to do on the New Orleans school system. The day they were announced I ordered a nice new Powerbook G4 867 and found it on my doorstep only a few days later.

    It was a beautiful machine, if you've never played with one in person, you won't believe it. I played with it for a couple of days, took it to school to take notes and do research on. The more I used it, the more I loved it. But, it was just too much to be carrying around, $2300 in my backpack had a tendency to make me a little nervous. I decided maybe I should turn it around and pick up an iBook. My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas. So on November 19th, up on eBay it went, along with an Airport Basestation and a bunch of other knickknacks. I set a buy-it-now price on a whim for $2950.

    The next morning I checked my auction, a couple of bids placed, and so the buy-it-now option was gone. Checking my email I got a couple of questions about the computer and much to my surprise, an offer to buy it for $2900 from Steve Matthews, a dad with a lucky son in college who was going to be getting a Powerbook for his birthday. Steve wanted to pay for it COD, no problem, its actually how I usually sell things. I called him on the phone number he gave me to ask a couple of questions and make sure everything was on the up and up.

    He reiterated that he was buying it as a last minute present for his son and since it was already setup as a package, he thought it was a good deal. Not to mention the Chicago Apple stores were still out of stock. I got home from school, packed up my Powerbook and accessories, and off they went Fedex overnight to Chicago, never to be seen again.

    At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?

    My girlfriend and I went away for Thanksgiving, and when we got back on Friday, I had a message from my bank. The branch manager had called to let me know she had a returned item for $3052.78 and that my account was now in the negative. Seriously in the negative. No problem I thought, I'll just call Steve and see what's up.

    So I dialed the number I had. In the back of my mind I expected a "this number has been disconnected message". Instead I got an answer, the voice sounded identical to Steve, so I asked if Steve was there.

    "Oh, Steve, yeah, that's my cousin, he's out of town for Thanksgiving you know. He'll be back Tuesday"

    "Can I leave a message for him?"

    So I left my information and asked that he give me a call. That little voice in the back of my mind let out a sigh and an uh-oh. The voices were the same right? Was I being scammed? Well, if I was, I certainly wasn't going to let the weekend go by without doing a little investigating.

    I started off with the information I had. His AOL email address, his phone number, and the address I shipped the computer to. The AOL address didn't yield anything. Doing a reverse lookup on the address (thanks to Whitepages.com) I got three names and phone numbers, none of which matched anything I had. The phone number didn't give me anything. I finally found a way to lookup the exchange on the number to see if it was a cell phone or a landline (Fone Finder). It came back as Nextel and I wanted to scream.

    There really isn't anything you can do with a cell phone number. There are no directory services. The cell phone companies won't give out any information. And that's that. I called Nextel and pleaded with them. The customer service rep I spoke with seemed more confused than anything. He kept asking me what my Nextel phone number was and why I suspected someone was fraudulently billing to my account. I calmly explained at least three times that I was not a Nextel customer, that I was just trying to get an address for another customer I suspect has defrauded me, etc, etc. I finally gave up on Chris from Nextel, I've had customer service reps who don't even speak English who were more helpful.

    I was at a dead end. I'd just sent my $2300 laptop, my Airport basestation, and a load of stuff to somebody I didn't know and all I had to show for it was a bill from Fedex for overnight shipping and a returned cashier's check. It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it.

    Sunday the first of December, I sprang into action full force. I called for help. I knew I wasn't going to get anywhere with this on my own, so I figured I might be able to get some help from some bulletin boards. I posted my tale of woe and call for assistance on every Mac bulletin board I could think of. I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little. I wanted this guy's address and I wanted it bad. I was already pricing flights to Chicago and putting my professors on notice that I might have to miss a little class. I may have made an error in trusting this person, but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me.

    I got more replies than I could keep up with. Everyone wanted to know what they could do to help or at least offer support. Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything. I think a 102:1 great person to asshole ratio is pretty good. Several people living in Chicago offered their assistance, be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary.

    The most important reply I got was a pointer to an online PI service that does reverse lookups on cell phones. I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me. Twelve hours and $85.00 later, I had a name, an address, and a landline phone number for this guy. The name and his AOL email were eerily close, actually with a last name like Christmas, it would be pretty weird if it didn't match up. I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me.

    I was now ready to call the police. I called the Chicago police department and filed a report. I gave the operator all of my information, including the real name and address I had managed to get. "A detective will contact you within one to two weeks, thank you." One to two weeks?!? I had this guy, I'd done all the work already, all you had to do was go pick him up. I'd even gone ahead and called Fedex and spoken to the Chicago station manager and was assured that the driver would cooperate in identifying the guy if necessary. All they had to do was pick him up. In one to two weeks he could be gone. And all the while my precious Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    I was furious. Chicago PD weren't going to do anything about this. If they were anything like the New Orleans PD, one to two weeks was likely to turn in to never. I figured I'd call Mr. Christmas myself. Let him know I was going to give him a chance to fix this, and I thought, maybe at least scare him. Let him know he was dealing with someone who would track him down no matter what, even if I had to make a deal with the Prince of Darkness to do it. Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I kept checking the message boards. Maybe someone would have a better idea. I called the local FBI field office. Agent Jones was very understanding, but let me know that even though this crossed state lines, the field office didn't take anything involving less than $5000. "Try the Chicago PD".

    I kept everyone on the Mac boards updated as best I could. On Tuesday I got a useful reply, try the Secret Service, counterfeiting is their jurisdiction. I made my way to the under-renovation Federal Building here in New Orleans. After walking many a dark, scary hallway, found myself at the door of Agent Keith Lopola. Keith came out and heard my case. I had brought copies of all the emails between myself and Steve Matthews/Paul Smith/Mr. Christmas, a copy of the check, and the call journal I had started keeping. Agent Lopola told me the same thing the FBI did, "It falls under our jurisdiction, but we can't take the case." He wanted to let me know that he really felt for me. Thanks. I left the office determined to call and bother him and the Chicago PD everyday for the rest of my life or at least until Mr. Christmas was behind bars.

    Finals were fast approaching. It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check. That and some grubby criminal has your Powerbook. It's enough to drive someone to the drink.

    Tuesday night I got an email from someone who had seen my story posted on O'Grady's Powerpage, a Powerbook enthusiast site. George Dunbar had seen the story and thought it sounded eerily similar to his. I called him, we compared notes, and turns out it was the same guy. George forwarded me all of his emails. Everything was the same, word for word, it was like Mr. Christmas just copied and pasted and magically made money. George was in it worse than I was though and had completely given up. He was out $6000 and two computers. He also let me know that there were more victims. He'd talked to at least three other people who had been taken by the same guy, all of whom had just given up. I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Wednesday morning I decided I was going to Chicago. I set up another eBay auction under my girlfriend's account, this time for same computer, different city. Three hours later, lo and behold I received an email from eBay user videopro55 (the same one) asking me if I'd like to sell the computer right now for $2500. Oh yes, I'd love to sell the computer, I'll even be there when it gets delivered to make sure it gets "setup properly".

    He emailed me a new address and phone number, the phone number again traced back to the same address for Mr. Christmas. I called the Secret Service and the Chicago PD, pleading, all they had to do was be there when Fedex dropped off the package. It was a guaranteed hit, he'd have another counterfeit cashier's check, all you'd have to do is arrest him. Like shooting fish in a barrel. "Sorry, Detective McDonaugh will be out until next Wednesday, can I take a message?" Fine, if the cops won't do it, I decided I'd just Priceline a ticket and be waiting next door when it got dropped off. So I'd know what kind of neighborhood I was looking at, I asked for help again in the Mac boards. Two Chicago residents replied, and the next morning, courtesy of Tim, I had 23 pictures of the house, the cars in the driveway (with license plate numbers) and the neighborhood. I'd like to see a Dell user do something like that at 4:30 in the morning for a complete stranger a thousand miles away. I started planning my trip. I decided I'd leave on Saturday, have the package delivered on Monday, and make it back just in time to screw up on all my finals.

    On Friday in preparation for flying up I mapped the new address from the one for Mr. Christmas to see how close it was. As I looked at the map, it hit me. The new address wasn't in Chicago. It was in a suburb, Markham. I googled for the Markham police and 5 minutes later was talking to a very enthusiastic Sargeant Knapp. I had hit the jackpot, the new drop was outside of Chicago jurisdiction and therefore outside of their inattentiveness as well. Sargeant Knapp informed me he loved this kind of thing, even had a UPS and Fedex uniform ready. He'd call Fedex and they would set it up for Tuesday. I was certain I was dreaming. After talking to two detectives in Chicago, an FBI field agent, an agent in the New Orleans field office of the Secret Service, an agent with the L.A. Secret Service and having a conference call with a large group of agents from the Chicago Secret Service, I finally was getting somewhere. And I didn't even have to stand on someone's doorstep with a baseball bat to do it.

    I spent the entire weekend on pins and needles. What if Mr. Christmas figured something out between now and Tuesday? All would be lost. I wouldn't even get the chance to confront him on my own. On Monday I spoke with Sgt. Knapp to make sure everything was ready to go. I had sent him a package with all of my documentation (he didn't have email), and I tried to explain what all the email stuff meant as best I could. He had worked everything out with Fedex and they were set for the delivery on Tuesday.

    I called my brother in Nashville and had him send the package. I had set everything up to be coming from there so that Mr. Christmas wouldn't get suspicious. I could barely sleep Monday night. All I could think about was something going wrong and my only chance at getting this guy being missed. I wanted to update everyone on the Mac boards, but I had to keep it quiet until I knew something was going to happen.

    Tuesday afternoon Sgt. Knapp called. They had tried the delivery but no one was home. I just wanted to scream. The board users kept posting how the suspense was driving them nuts. Well, it was going to give me an aneurism. A million possibilities went through my head. Maybe he had somebody working at Fedex who tipped him off, maybe I worded something in one of my email a little off. Sgt. Knapp called me back to let me know they would try the delivery again tomorrow. He also wanted to let me know that they had intercepted another package that was being sent to the same address. Looks like he'd already struck again, thankfully the lady from New York will get her computer back. He also told me that he was definitely going to keep pursuing this, and that oddly enough, the address I'd given him was also related to another fraud case, but this one much bigger (hundreds of thousands) involving a certain Chicago franchise I won't mention. So maybe I had led them to something bigger than just some asshole counterfeiting cashier's checks.

    Today I had finals all day. I'm a 4.0 honors student. I've had a 4.0 all semester. I'm not sure if I'll keep that after today. I just couldn't sleep last night. All I could think about was Mr. Christmas and the delivery. I couldn't study either. So I winged it, I'll get my grades tomorrow. I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.

    *I* got him.

    I'm right now waiting on Sgt. Knapp to fax me a copy of his mug shot for posterity. Then I'm going to go celebrate. Sgt. Knapp said the guy was cooperating and he was going to try to recover my laptop. I'm hopeful, but I don't expect it. I might not ever get my computer back, but at least there is one less asshole on the street. When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

    For everyone on all the boards who offered their help and encouragement, I thank you. This would have been a lot harder without you. If you're ever in New Orleans, look me up and I'll buy you a beer. I've still got to figure out how I'm paying to college next semester, but I'll keep some beer money set aside for ya'll.

    Oh yeah, and if there are any lawyers in the Chicago area who can file a civil suit against this guy for damages (yeah I know I'm not going to collect) please contact me, misterye a t yahoo d o t com

    The sites with great users that helped out (you can sign up for the forums and read all about this as it was going on): MacRumors.com MacNN ThinkSecret O'Grady's PowerPage

    Update 12/11/02 18:58 CST: Sgt. Knapp is sending me a copy of Mr. Christmas's mug shot. I'll post it as soon as I get it.

    Update 12/11/02 21:39 CST: For those interesting in getting in contact with me, my email address is misterye at yahoo dot com, if you think you were also a victim, please call me at 504-894-1243 and I'll put you in touch with the appropriate people.

    Update 12/11/02 23:36 CST: I've gone back through and added links where appropriate. I'll try to reformat this tomorrow.

    Update 12/12/02 10:36 CST: Ok, so how's this for small world: Apparently this thing is getting posted everywhere. I just got a call from Matt of the Real World Season 9 (the New Orleans Real World). So anyway, the cast of the New Orleans Real World used to all work at 735 Nightclub. I moved down here to actually take-over their marketing right after the show ended. So I never met Matt or any of them until speaking to him today. Small, weird world.

    Update 12/12/02 12:03 CST: I've added a forum where everyone can talk about this. Here it is.

    Update 12/12/02 13:30 CST: For those of you wanting to donate to my cause, I urge you to choose a local charity. There are a lot of needy people and organizations out there this season, if you can't think of anything local, I'm a big fan of Doctor's Without Borders and Lambda International. If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com. She's the one who's covering this check for me right now, so I guess she should get this. I'm still not entirely sure about this, but you've insisted. Thanks again.

    Last update Wednesday, December 12th 13:49 PM CST

    Copyright 2002 Jason Eric Smith

    • Re:here goes by Mr Guy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:31PM
      • Re:here goes by Nogami_Saeko (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @08:08PM
    • Re:here goes by ubrayj02 (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:22PM
      • Re:here goes by sweetooth (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:39PM
      • Re:here goes by missing_boy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:45PM
        • Re:here goes by ubrayj02 (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:02PM
      • You can get your money back... by raehl (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:55PM
      • Re:here goes by iocat (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:32PM
        • Bike stealers! GRRR! by Anitra (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:19PM
          • Re:Bike stealers! GRRR! (Score:4, Funny)

            by interociter (587446) on Friday December 13 2002, @12:21AM (#4878090) Homepage
            I must admit that I stole a few bikes when I was in college. Wait, don't damn me yet. Hear me out.

            Sometimes, when in the midst of a night at the bars, me and my freinds would steal bikes from the racks by various dorms. We'd pick bikes with shitty locks that were easily picked, and go off on a joy ride. We always treated the bikes well, and always returned them the same evening in the same condition as when we stole them. We never cut locks, bent rims, or anything. Although I know it was theft, you could make a case for "borrowing without permission". As far as I can tell, the owners never found out.

            Except once.

            On one occasion, "my" bike was really shitty. The tires were half-flat, the chain was rusty and skipped, and the handlebars were dangerously loose. I'm still not sure why I did this, but I bailed on my drinking buddies, took the bike home, and fixed it. My roommates were all hardcore road racers, and had all the right tools. I filled the tires, tightened the bars, tightened and oiled the chain, and took it back.

            In retrospect, I think there was a little "Charlie Brown Christmas" working. "It's not such a bad bike. All it needs is a little love." On the other hand, I got an evil thrill out of thinking that the owner wasn't going to know what to make of their bike healing itself. "Some asshole stole my bike! And...fixed...it. Guh?"
            [ Parent ]
      • Roman justice system by zabieru (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:42PM
      • Re:here goes by pootypeople (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:29PM
      • Re:here goes by The Tyro (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @02:47AM
      • yes this is how we do it in USA, pinko swine by mutzinator (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @05:45AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Morons are modding parent down (Score:5, Insightful)

      by doc_traig (453913) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:39PM (#4875651) Homepage Journal

      Cut it out. The guy's server is a smoking corpse right now. If it weren't for this guy, I wouldn't have been able to read the story.

      Please, go find something good and MOD IT UP for a change.

      - DDT

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:here goes (Score:5, Funny)

      by LegendOfLink (574790) on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:16PM (#4875968) Homepage
      When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

      Man, forget using police officers and government agents to keep order among society, just put Mac users on patrol.

      Remember boys and girls, Mac users are our FRIEND.

      Sarcasm aside, I'm glad Jason found this jerkass. However, I do think it'd be funny to see a group of angry Mac users chucking IMacs through the scammer's window.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:here goes by foo12 (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:22PM
        • Re:here goes by Simon Garlick (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:45PM
          • Re:here goes by Myco (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:18PM
            • Re:here goes by foo12 (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:31PM
              • Re:here goes by Myco (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:43PM
      • Uhm, but... by raehl (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @12:11AM
    • Re:here goes by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:28PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:here goes by gonaddespammed.com (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:43AM
    • Re:here goes by wallior (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @05:08AM
    • by misterye (260449) on Thursday December 12 2002, @07:48PM (#4876676) Homepage
      Yes, it did fail. The FBI and the Secret Service work out of field offices. If they had more tha $5k in my field area, they would have gone after it. The Secret Service in L.A. (where another one of the victims lives) said they'd take the case after I called them, but that since the perp lived in Chicago they had to get the Chicago SS involved. The Chicago SS had a long conference call w/ me in which they grilled me about the case and then concluded that they needed at least $50k in damages before they could take it. Welcome to the nightmare of interstate criminal investigation.

      It's like another poster said, the real lesson I learned was that as long as you keep it under $5k per victim, you can do this all your life and no one is ever going to come after you. Well, no one but geeks like me anyway.

      Thanks to everyone again, this has gotten *way* bigger than I could have imagined, the Chicago Tribune just called me. I don't know whether to be proud or find a corner to hide in.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Serves Him Right by Artifex (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @10:19PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • All would've been different... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Cowtard (573891) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:28PM (#4874886)
    ...if this guy had just waited to ship the item until the payment had cleared. If the buyer wasn't interested in that, then wait for another buyer who *is* willing.

    Would've saved him a lot more trouble and money in the long run.
  • "doing god knows what with it"? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:29PM
  • FedEX Responsibility (Score:4, Redundant)

    by rjstanford (69735) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:29PM (#4874898) Homepage Journal
    Doesn't FedEX have some responsibility in this case? After all, if you ship something COD and they accept a counterfit check, why is that completely your fault?

    I'm not saying that it isn't legally your problem, just that in an ideal world it shouldn't be. After all, presumably it would be FedEX's fault if they accepted something written in crayon on a brown paper sack ... where do you draw the line? Any ideas?
    • Re:FedEX Responsibility (Score:5, Funny)

      by Mandi Walls (6721) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:42PM (#4875047) Homepage Journal
      I dunno, man.

      Cashier's checks look different at every bank. You can't expect the FedEx guy to whip out his cel phone and call the bank right at the guy's doorstep to check out the legitimacy of the paperwork.

      He's just the messenger.

      's almost as bad as relying on the manager at McDonald's to catch counterfeit $20s.

      Mac users are a posse, man. They're like one big inbred family. They trust other Mac users 'cause they have some bizarre kinship for being on the short end of the tech stick.

      Like us here, only with the social stick...

      --mandi

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:FedEX Responsibility by jgg (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:43PM
    • Re:FedEX Responsibility by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:08PM
    • Re:FedEX Responsibility by tchristney (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:26PM
    • COD? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:52PM
    • Re:FedEX Responsibility by dcmeserve (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @10:29PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Find by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:31PM
  • Naughty by Superfreaker (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:32PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Note to self by eclectric (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:33PM
  • Every group has the zealots by clutch110 (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:33PM
  • Why go through all that trouble to figure out... by GoofyBoy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:33PM
  • Schizophrenic by Superfreaker (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:35PM
  • Go against ebay rules, get burned (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Nefrayu (601593) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:37PM (#4874985) Homepage
    Ok, so it sounds like from this article the guy listed his system on eBay, but then sold it to a guy who "saw his ad" on eBay, but didn't actually bid on the item. This is 1. Against eBay rules for selling, and 2. Stupid. There's no way to get any kind of verification on who it was he was talking with (as he found out), no way to check out the guy's prior habits (via feedback), and no way to get back at the guy without a lot of effort. Every sale on eBay is insured up to a certain amount, with fraud protection offered through PayPal and through credit cards, COD is also the worst way to go.
    I tell everyone who contacts me in this manner to bid on my auctions. Period. There's a reason eBay has these rules, and this is one of them.
    But, no one ever said Mac users were the shiniest apples in the barrel.
  • If I were ekrout... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:38PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The broken window theory (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Fished (574624) <[amphigory] [at] [gmail.com]> on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:39PM (#4875007)
    One of the things he mentions is tha tthe FBI and Secret Service were not interested in anything less than $5000. Chicago police just weren't interested... This brings up something called "the broken window theory." It goes like this: some socioligists whose names escape me observed that, as long as no window was broken in a building, they tended to stay unbroken. However, as soon as one was broken, if it was not repaired every window in the building would be broken in a couple of weeks.

    The idea here is that, by ignoring small crimes, the police miss chances to prevent big crimes. The funny thing is that the people wanted for "small" (I don't think of $3000 as small, but that's just me) crimes are often pulling the same scam again and again - but no one ever turns them in. These "small" scams can add up to really large amounts of money and become big ones.

    A few years ago, we had a homeless man who we gave a household job to steal a check out of my wife's checkbook. We only found out when we got a call from the grocery store, asking if we had actually written the check. Of course we hadn't -- the reason the grocery store had called us was that the guy had pulled the same stunt, at the same grocery store, seven times before. No one ever pressed charges. Well, we pressed charges, and it turned out the guy was also wanted for 10 counts of car theft, forging, fraud, etc. etc. ad nauseam. The really nauseating part? The police never followed through on our theft and forgery complaints, even though this guy had dozens of similar complaints against him.

    So, the bottom line in my not so humble opinion is that, if you want to prevent crime, you don't need to outlaw guns or anything: just start enforcing the laws you already have.

    • Re:The broken window theory (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:42PM (#4875049)
      you should have planted a joint on him before calling the cops, that would have got them interested.
      [ Parent ]
    • Hired to steal checks? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Osty (16825) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:46PM (#4875100) Homepage

      few years ago, we had a homeless man who we gave a household job to steal a check out of my wife's checkbook.

      You hired a homeless man to steal checks from your wife? No wonder you got screwed.


      (Hint: Next time, try using decent setence structure to not confuse your point.)

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:The broken window theory by ronfar (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:52PM
    • My kingdom for a comma by tswinzig (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:53PM
    • Re:The broken window theory (Score:5, Interesting)

      by psxndc (105904) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:54PM (#4875202) Journal
      This is also know as the tipping point. There is X point in a relationship where going just beyond that point causes a dramatic shift in that relationship. Example: Say crime in CityX is 5%. 6% is the tipping point such that if crime stays at 5% it will remain 5% indefinitely. By inching that percentage up 1% to 6% for some reason the reality is that crime will jump to say 12% the year after it hit 6%. It's just a weird phenomenom that has to do with people's perception of a reality becoming a self fulfilling prophecy. More info can be found here [fsbassociates.com]

      psxndc

      [ Parent ]
    • Reminds me of New York (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Dark Paladin (116525) <jhummelNO@SPAMjohnhummel.net> on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:57PM (#4875234) Homepage
      As I seem to recall (and people from New York feel free to correct me on this), one of the things that Rudy Guiliani [sic] did was have the police start ticketing people who jaywalked.

      The result? Overall reduction in crime - since if you were going to be caught for the little things, odds are you were going to be caught for doing a big thing (selling drugs, etc). And it made the police highly visible - and the one thing I remembered from my old criminal law classes (before I ditched law) - the likelyhood of getting caught for a crime is a far greater deterance than the punishment of a crime.

      I have to agree - if we have a system that busted people for crimes - regardless of the "level" (no, I'm not suggesting death penalties for jaywalking, calm down, or a police state - just if a crime is obviously committed, like a bike theft **cough**like I went through once**cough**), go after it. Odds are, it would do more good in the long run by nipping these "small time" crooks in the bud before they ever become "big time".
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Reminds me of New York (Score:5, Interesting)

        by lysurgon (126252) <joshk@NosPaM.outlandishjosh.com> on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:24PM (#4875515) Homepage Journal
        Actually the Guiliani directive to crack down on "quality of life" crime went way further back than jaywaliking. In fact the aggressive prosecution of jaywalkers (and the outlawying of dancing in unlicensed city bars and clubs) is really where he went over the line.

        The basis of the quality of life program was to try to move in and bust kids writing graffitti, homeless people loitering and especially low-level drug dealers. Beat cops had previously been instructed to avoid drug deals for fear of corruption.

        The numbers largely speak for themselves (though there's a strong case that improved economic conditions do as much to deter crime as incresed police presence), but because of endemic flaws in the police system (e.g. a certain amount of ingranced racism) the whole campaign caused a lot of acrimony.

        People (more often than not minorities) were being stopped and shaken down for guns and drugs illegally, but since these shakedowns seemed effective, the department allowed it to go on. The high-profile beatings and killings of minorities around the city was causing a lot of civil unrest. Thankfully, since 9-11 the relationship between the police and the people of the city seems to be back on track. Too bad it took such a tragedy to set things right.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Reminds me of New York (Score:4, Insightful)

          by neocon (580579) on Thursday December 12 2002, @07:31PM (#4876560) Homepage Journal

          I'm going to make a wild guess here -- you don't live in New York at all, right?

          If you do, you must not get off campus much, eh?

          You've just presented a remarkably inaccurate picture of the police program which turned New York around, and had already improved relations between police and communities (including minority communities) long before 9/11.

          See, `the minorities' aren't any different than the rest of us. Everyone wants to be safe in their home and neighborhood. By having the police fight crime in minority neighborhoods as well as rich neighborhoods, instead of just giving up on areas like East Harlem and Bed-Stuy, Giuliani did more for police-community relations than any of the hundreds of `outreach programs' ever had.

          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Reminds me of New York by I_redwolf (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:42AM
      • Re:Reminds me of New York by michaelggreer (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:37PM
      • Los Angeles, too by clem.dickey (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:13PM
      • Re:Reminds me of New York by wytcld (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:22PM
      • Re:Reminds me of New York by funkdoctorspock (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:37PM
      • Re:Reminds me of New York by dcmeserve (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @10:59PM
      • Re:Reminds me of New York by shepd (Score:1) Sunday December 15 2002, @03:53AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:The broken window theory by shepd (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:00PM
    • Re:The broken window theory by indiigo (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:25PM
    • Missing Clothing Theory (Score:4, Funny)

      by Gimpin (595657) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:26PM (#4875532)
      No, no, no...the broken window theory is untrue. I, with over 1100 hours of 'Cops' logged on my TiVo, am an expert of crimes of the felony rank. The only way for the police to lock up dirtbags is they must either reside in a trailer (aka dirtbag theory) or have a missing article of clothing (excluding shoes).
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:The broken window theory by Jack9 (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:18PM
    • You mean Malcolm Gladwell by JustAnotherLurker (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:03PM
    • Re:The broken window theory by The Mainframe (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:57PM
    • Re:The broken window theory by delstar dotstar (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:45PM
    • Re:The broken window theory by Lumpy (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @06:40AM
  • Please Help - Need Karma! by johnalex (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:41PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • COD=BAD by autojive (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:41PM
  • Awfully dangerous (Score:5, Insightful)

    by interstellar_donkey (200782) <pathighgate@@@hotmail...com> on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:42PM (#4875052) Homepage Journal
    This story should be fowarded to everyone at the Chicago police. It should be an embarassment for them.

    The ho hum attitude of law inforcement regarding things done on the Internet is sad, and scary. If the young man hadn't finally been able to contact an agency that actually wanted to do their job (stop crime), who knows where it would have gone.

    Being a vigilante is never a good idea, but when the police don't do anything, it leaves the average person little choice.

    I suspect we'll start seeing this more and more in the future, as long as law enforcement refuses to act on these things. Why should a person have to spend their own time and money in order to stop criminals? Are we going to reach a point where the only way someone can get an investigation is if they pay somebody to do it? I thought that's what our taxes which paid for police departments were supposed to do.

    Just wait.. Withen a few years somebodys going to get killed because the police sat on their hands and a frustrated victim did their footwork and blows the person who scammed them away.
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by mmmuttly (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:54PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by hampton (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:00PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by Jeffrey Baker (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:03PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by Dimensio (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:04PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by anonymous loser (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:05PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:07PM
      • Re:Awfully dangerous (Score:5, Insightful)

        by djrogers (153854) on Friday December 13 2002, @02:04AM (#4878487) Homepage
        But of course, being concerned about that is fashionable in law-enforcement circles these days.


        Umm, ok... I know it's really cool to use daddy's 1337 computer to make fun of cops, but how on earth can you bring yourself to question the motives of someone trying to save a child from rape, torture, murder, or worse?

        What gives you the balls to even _think_ that a man who has dedicated his life to protecting innocent children does it because it makes him look good?

        Tell you what, you sit in on an interview with a 9 year old girl after the fact, and then come back and tell me that cops just do what's 'fashionable'.

        shmuck...
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Awfully dangerous - Already happened by Havokmon (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:23PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by kiolbasa (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:29PM
      • Re:Awfully dangerous by interstellar_donkey (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:37PM
        • Re:Awfully dangerous (Score:4, Interesting)

          by stratjakt (596332) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:50PM (#4875737) Journal
          >> And in a perfect world, they would have people assigned to this sort of thing, and enough of them to do something about it in a timeful manner.

          In a perfect world, there would be no cranks or nutjobs who spend all day having the local cops run errands for them or otherwise bother them with trivial bullshit.

          I'm not saying this guy is one, but we have a bitchy old crank down the street who calls the cops every time a kid cuts across her lawn on the way home from school.

          I had the cops come to my door 5 nights a row at my old townhouse because the neighbour kept reporting my car as a 'suspicious vehicle parked out in front'. Luckily I work for a company that sells software to police, and my local county in particular, so the problem quickly went away.

          Then there's the drunks who go out and pick a fight, get their asses kicked, then show up at the station wanting to 'see the guy locked up'.

          And everyone who gets the short end of the stick on a business deal wants the cops to do something for them.

          My point is, forget the fact that there's an overwhelming amount of crime for a cop to be able to deal with each incident in a timely manner.. Theres so much bullshit and whining, they never get to the real incidents. And when they do, their hands are so tied with beurocracy and paperwork and bullshit procedures that you aren't going to see your 'eye for an eye' instant gratification.

          As I mentioned, I write and support software for the public safety industry. I can dial in to any one of hundreds of our CAD (Computer Automated Dispatching) systems and see the ratio of cranks/whines to actual incidents is literally 100:1.

          In a case like this, if you have the evidence of who ripped you off and how, it's much better to get a lawyer and drag it into a civil court.

          Disclaimer: Noone has more disrespect for cops than me, I work with 'em every day. There are many incompetent, arrogant, power-tripping douchebags with a gun and a badge out there. But they do have a pretty much impossible job to do. They write so many speeding/seatbelt tickets because thats all the system lets them do effectively.
          [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by geekoid (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:06PM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by bboypicknick (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:07PM
    • As much as hate the idea of the suburb... by SuperMario666 (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:22AM
    • Re:Awfully dangerous by MoneyT (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:07PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • I'm glad.... by griffeymac (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:42PM
  • Congratulations... by tuxracer (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:43PM
  • Fucking moron by Jennifer Ever (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:44PM
  • What a wimp by jsonmez (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:45PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • huh...what a moron by wolfgang_spangler (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:45PM
  • Uhh... I would have called the police... by billnapier (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:45PM
  • this article is insulting by heff (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:46PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Here it is by smcavoy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:46PM
  • Has anyone noticed how bad yahoo shopping is now? by pheph (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:47PM
  • PC? more like.. "AOL".. by miltimj (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:47PM
  • Punishment? by JThaddeus (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:47PM
  • Relevant with the times. by The Jonas (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:47PM
  • Pretty smart, but simple steps were missed by ManoMarks (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:48PM
  • Good luck collecting by billstewart (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:48PM
  • in case of /.ing... by countzer0interrupt (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:49PM
  • Funny (Score:3, Funny)

    by cheezedawg (413482) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:49PM (#4875151) Journal
    I think its funny that

    1) He no longer has his mac
    2) He is out $3000
    3) He failed his finals
    4) He spent a bunch of extra money tracking the guy down (plane ticket, PI, etc)
    5) He is still happy about it

    I'd guess he is a "Glass is half full" kind of guy.
    • Re:Funny by Trogre (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:32PM
      • Re:Funny by Trogre (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:37PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Funny by Dan D. (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:14PM
    • Re:Funny by ChaosDiscord (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:40PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Funny by tigga (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:51PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • If we could mod the stories.... by bryhhh (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:50PM
  • Newsflash! Interesting story posted on /.! by linux slacker (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:50PM
  • by The Fun Guy (21791) <niemira.gmail@com> on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:51PM (#4875167) Homepage Journal
    ... unless you try to screw a Mac addict. Then you'll be hunted down in meatspace like a, like a, like a something-or-other.

    Serves the thief right for messing with a Mac type. Everybody knows they're unstable to begin with, and all it takes is a just a little push for them to go postal.

    (So, +1 Funny for the first paragraph, -1 Flamebait for the second? Worth the risk.)
  • no police force by moosemoose (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:54PM
  • Great that he got his laptop back by fobbman (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:54PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Hello? by /dev/trash (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:55PM
    • Re:Hello? by geekoid (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:10PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Mirror (Score:5, Informative)

    by Selanit (192811) on Thursday December 12 2002, @04:55PM (#4875211)
    Here is a mirror of the article [atuan.com].

    I'll leave it up for a day or two. If it's Saturday 14 Dec 2002 and you're reading this, the mirror has probably gone poof.

    I sure hope my server can take it.

    Regarding the article -- it's kind of spooky how dedicated Mac fans get. I mean, at one point he talks about the horror of not knowing who was using his mac. Most people would have been more concerned about the thousands of dollars lost due to a counterfeit check. 0_o
  • COD!? by wumarkus420 (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:55PM
  • WOW by thinkliberty (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:01PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Escrow (Score:4, Informative)

    by Malc (1751) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:01PM (#4875269)
    If you can't afford to lose the money, use escrow. This is exactly why the service exists. If the other party doesn't want to use escrow, move on - there are plenty of other fish in the sea. Well, this applies for the buyer as the seller has the control. By going COD, the seller gives control and thus the chance to defraud to the buyer.

    I haven't bought anything online since last February, so I'm rather disappointed to see that Escrow.ca has closed shop... they were far cheaper than Escrow.com. The latter's fees almost make it unusable for items of just a couple of hundred dollars. The other good thing with escrow.ca was I could walk 5 mins down the road and deposit cash directly in to the TD bank account and get the item shipped quickly.

    What with stupid people commonly bidding stuff up to retail prices or above, plus extortionate shipping charges and escrow fees, eBay isn't very useful to me anymore.
    • Re:Escrow (Score:5, Informative)

      by tdrury (49462) on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:53PM (#4876239) Homepage

      Be careful about escrow scams. escrow.com is a valid site, but there are many, many scam sites. eBay user fenton.smith keeps a database of these and is very quick to spot and catalog them. See fenton's escrow scam page here: sos4auctions [sos4auctions.com]

      I maintain a list of scam auction red flags. See my page here [ebay.com].
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Escrow by emptybody (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @12:39AM
  • Page text by Mr. McGibby (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:02PM
  • Next stop /. by forau (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:03PM
  • yes! by painehope (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:09PM
    • Re:yes! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by misterye (260449) on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:48PM (#4875715) Homepage
      I am Jason Eric Smith, and I would probably die laughing if I did see a Ellen Feiss peeing on Intel sticker. You should pursue it, you'd sell millions.


      Actually, the anti-PC bit was writing to my audience. I never expected this to get outside the Mac bulletin boards. Honestly I don't care what kind of computer you use, they're just tools. Cheers all.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:yes! by painehope (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @10:32PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Moral by Eamon C (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:10PM
  • Why all the anti-PC in the article? by mochan_s (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:14PM
  • Apple: Take Note ... by WCityMike (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:14PM
  • Just wait till the money clears! by salimfadhley (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:15PM
  • Un-forgeable cheques by bigberk (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:16PM
  • Imagine the butthead sitting with his buddy drinkin beeeer outside on the porch (assuming its out in the middle of nowhere) watching black cars and vw minis go by with strange white folk staring out through tinted glasses with cameras in hand snapping pics like crazy :) ..

    Had to laugh..
  • Modern Art by phyzik (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:27PM
  • So what did the criminal do wrong? by airrage (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:30PM
  • The biggest scam yet... by polv0 (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:33PM
  • What if its still a scam? by JVert (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:33PM
  • This guy really has an IQ problem by eadint (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:38PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Who's the scammer here? by cybermace5 (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:47PM
  • I had a similar experience with a Sony Clie by ssstraub (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:49PM
  • This story seems fishy by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:55PM
  • Because it was a Mac? Uh, NO! by ssstraub (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:56PM
  • Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! (Score:5, Informative)

    by cardozo (64194) on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:02PM (#4875851)
    Ebay has fraud protection program [ebay.com]. Why didn't this guy go through them. Sure they're not going to go arrest the guy, but they'll certainly close him down on ebay. Even now he can get some of his money back from them... if it was an ebay transaction

    For that matter if Mr. Christmas had done this a lot, why didn't the seller look at the buyer's feedback? Certainly if Mr. Christmas has been ripping people off the sellers would leave negative feedback.

    Well, it turns out that videopro55 has no feedback [ebay.com]!

    Looking on ebay for the transaction turned up nothing either.

    From a more careful reading of the story, I infer that the seller took it off of ebay and sold it privately. This was a bad idea. Yeah, you have to pay ebay a commission, but that's their business, and you wouldn't have sold it without them. It's also against ebay's seller policies [ebay.com] to do this.

    So while I'm really very sympathetic about this guy getting ripped off, I think he could have been a little smarter about it.

    Lesson to all of us: Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards.

    • Re:Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by Mitreya (Score:3) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:14PM
    • ebay's safeguards MY ARSE.. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by matt_wilts (249194) <[moc.liamtoh] [ta] [stliw_ttam]> on Thursday December 12 2002, @07:37PM (#4876595)
      Here's the response I got from Ebay when I thought I detected shill bidding:


      To: Matt {matt_wilts}
      Subject: Re: Possible shill bidding on auction 1235911285 (KMM28339167C0KM)
      From: eBay UK Investigations {ukinvestigations@ebay.com}
      Reply-To: eBay UK Investigations {ukinvestigations@ebay.com}

      Hello Matt,

      Thank you for writing to us.

      I sincerely apologize for the delay of this e-mail and hope that it did not cause you any inconveniences!

      I have investigated your report regarding {{ insert user id }}, and can understand how this would be troublesome.

      Please be assured, if a violation of eBay policy has occurred, we will take the appropriate action in accordance with our site policies. Such action may include issuing a warning, temporary suspension, indefinite suspension or terminating the membership.

      Due to eBay's Privacy policy we are unable to provide information regarding the details of another user's account. We are equally
      concerned about violations on the site, and will thoroughly investigate each report we receive. However, the details of our actions cannot be
      disclosed with third party members. Please remember that this is for the protection of all eBay users.

      We appreciate your assistance in keeping eBay a fun and safe place to trade..

      I hope you have a wonderful week!
      Regards,
      Darcy
      eBay UK SafeHarbour
      Investigations Team


      Must be some new use of the word "safe" that I've not yet come across...

      Matt
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by sdo1 (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @01:06PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • My favourite line by Splezunk (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:15PM
  • Here is a link to his message to the board by Guiri (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:15PM
  • great story! here's a few more from our board by schatten (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:16PM
  • +1 for balls, -10 for no brains by freek_daddy (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:18PM
  • Eligible for reward? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Fencepost (107992) on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:22PM (#4876011) Journal
    Keep track of the case as much as possible - you may be eligible for a reward from an organization like CrimeStoppers (Canadian?) [crimestoppers.org] or (International "Parent") [c-s-i.org] or something similar. Unfortunately the sites don't seem to be particularly well set up for finding programs, but you've shown that you can be determined.

    The sergeant you worked with may be able to tell you if there's a CrimeStoppers or other program that might cover you - particularly if you're just hoping to cover what it cost you track everything down.

  • Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.com by mkweise (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:26PM
  • Future History?? (Score:5, Funny)

    by JebusIsLord (566856) on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:26PM (#4876046) Homepage
    Does a future history teacher teach the present?
  • Fedex cameras? by mbstone (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:32PM
  • I'd like to know the names and places by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:45PM
  • you got it all wrong, mac (Score:4, Funny)

    by Hubert_Shrump (256081) <`cobranet' `at' `gmail.com'> on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:46PM (#4876179) Homepage Journal
    I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Look, if you're going to have him retar up there, at least give him a hammer instead of the bat. He'll be up there all week! Jiminy!

  • Oh, the irony... by jim3e8 (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:51PM
  • Read the Drama by digitalgimpus (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:59PM
  • Why? by TheRain (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:16PM
  • The story on "Mac for free" by sugarmotor (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:34PM
  • Mark another one up by NeoSkandranon (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:47PM
  • In case anybody thought that Apple doesn't care... by geddes (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:57PM
  • Obvious by sparkleytone (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @08:25PM
  • Slightly misleading title... by unicorn (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @08:28PM
  • Tracking Projects? by phorm (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @08:48PM
  • Violated the Ebay Rules, eh? by The AtomicPunk (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @10:26PM
  • More impressive (Score:4, Informative)

    by harlequinSmurf (620030) on Thursday December 12 2002, @10:42PM (#4877663)
    I still think that the story of the guy who tracked down his sisters stolen iMac using timbuktu. here: Mac Thief Caught Thanks To Applescript & Timbuktu [slashdot] [slashdot.org] and here: Turning Macs on Thievery [wired.com] [wired.com]
  • That's fantastic that he got the guy and all... by neostorm (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:00AM
  • dude by W32.Klez.H (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:10AM
  • This is cool! by sickboy_macosX (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:38AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I can't believe no one has questioned this yet... by lostguy (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @01:29AM
  • Right... by KinkyClown (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @03:01AM
    • Re:Right... by Intrinsic (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @04:15AM
  • Fantastic work - but what about eBay feedback? by Zog The Undeniable (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @03:55AM
  • Stalkers R Us by Feniscowles (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @04:33AM
  • That's one reason I... by edgedmurasame (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @07:05AM
  • If you think that was a great story.... by eples (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @10:11AM
  • Is it just me or... by christopher240240 (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @10:50AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Mainstream press has the story by netringer (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @12:50PM
  • Move over, Rudolph! by sapporoitchy (Score:1) Friday December 13 2002, @02:17PM
  • Re:Who care's by loginx (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:27PM
    • Re:Who care's by loginx (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:42PM
      • Re:Who care's by MoneyT (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:48PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by SweetAndSourJesus (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:30PM
  • Re:In case of /.ing by PhoenixFlare (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:30PM
  • Re:[ Cached Version ] by Latent IT (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:33PM
  • Re:Next Time Use Escrow (NT) by Vladequacy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:44PM
  • Re:I HOPE I AM NOT TOO LATE FOR YOU ALL TO READ TH by RandyF (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @04:56PM
  • Re:Huh? Buying something makes you a "scam artist" by kliment (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:03PM
  • Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA (Score:3, Funny)

    by JVert (578547) <corganbilly@ho[ ]il.com ['tma' in gap]> on Thursday December 12 2002, @05:09PM (#4875360) Journal
    ./ Enhancement request:
    Anything with certain kewords (ex: "in soviet russia") gets automatic -1 karma.
    Yes I realize that includes this post right here.
    And I'm willing to take the bullet for my country!
    In slashdot we flame our own posts!!!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Entrapment? by freek_daddy (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:28PM
  • It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by Graspee_Leemoor (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @05:37PM
  • Re:Entrapment? (Score:5, Informative)

    by asmussen (2306) <asmussen@cox.n3.1415926et minus pi> on Thursday December 12 2002, @06:03PM (#4875860)
    This wouldn't have been entrapment [lectlaw.com] even had the police been the ones offering the item for sale on Ebay to begin with. All that happened was that an opportunity was created for him to use one of his counterfeit checks. Nobody even had to suggest to him that he illegally pay for the item with a counterfeit check, and even if somebody were to suggest it to him, including the police, it would not neccessarily be entrapment. (See the above link) He wasn't even approached asking to legally buy the item. He initiated the transaction himself in response to a publicly posted auction, which although admittedly posted as bait, was nothing even remotely resembling entrapment.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Why didn't he HAVE the address already? by Qender (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @06:42PM
  • Re:Ebay Rating System Didn't Work? by ManoMarks (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @07:17PM
  • Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by mstyne (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @08:15PM
  • Re:Ebay Rating System Didn't Work? by MoneyT (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:20PM
  • Re:If you're going to be dishonest anyway... by callipygian-showsyst (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @09:36PM
  • Re:I HOPE I AM NOT TOO LATE FOR YOU ALL TO READ TH by TheBillGates (Score:1) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:08PM
  • Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by GMontag (Score:2) Thursday December 12 2002, @11:32PM
  • Re:What an egotistical asshole by sapporoitchy (Score:2) Friday December 13 2002, @02:56PM
  • 48 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2